Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Neutrinos as background and signal in searches using the Migdal effect

Tarak Nath Maity*

  • School of Physics, The University of Sydney, ARC Centre of Excellence for Dark Matter Particle Physics, New South Wales 2006, Australia

  • *Contact author: tarak.maity.physics@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 111, 123020 – Published 10 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/h3th-6wsr

Abstract

Ionization or excitation resulting from the noninstantaneous response of the electron cloud to nuclear recoil is known as the Migdal effect. Dark matter searches utilizing this process set the most stringent bounds on the spin-independent dark matter–nucleon scattering cross section over a large region of the sub-GeV dark matter parameter space, underscoring its significance in dark matter detection. In this paper, we quantify the regions of dark matter parameter space that are challenging to probe via the Migdal effect due to the presence of dominant solar neutrino backgrounds for both liquid noble and semiconductor targets. Our findings reveal that there is no hard floor in the dark matter parameter space. Instead, we map the so-called neutrino fog. In mapping the neutrino fog, we identify the importance of incorporating the Migdal effect induced by neutrinos, as well as neutrino-electron scattering and dominant coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering, particularly for semiconductor targets. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a large portion of the relic density allowed parameter space lies within the neutrino fog. Finally, we estimate the exposure required to detect neutrino-induced Migdal events in direct detection experiments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (118)

  1. M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, arXiv:2406.01705.
  2. T. Lin, Proc. Sci., 333 (2019) 009 [arXiv:1904.07915].
  3. J. Cooley, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 55, 1 (2022).
  4. T. R. Slatyer, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 53, 1 (2022).
  5. O. Buchmueller, C. Doglioni, and L. T. Wang, Nat. Phys. 13, 217 (2017).
  6. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041003 (2023).
  7. Z. Bo et al. (PandaX Collaboration), arXiv:2408.00664.
  8. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), arXiv:2410.17036.
  9. H. An, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 141801 (2018); 121, 259903(E) (2018).
  10. T. Bringmann and M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 171801 (2019).
  11. Y. Ema, F. Sala, and R. Sato, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 181802 (2019).
  12. A. Das and M. Sen, Phys. Rev. D 104, 075029 (2021).
  13. D. K. Ghosh, T. Gupta, M. Heikinheimo, K. Huitu, and S. Jeesun, arXiv:2411.11973.
  14. A. Migdal et al., J. Phys. USSR 4, 449 (1941).
  15. J. D. Vergados and H. Ejiri, Phys. Lett. B 606, 313 (2005).
  16. M. Ibe, W. Nakano, Y. Shoji, and K. Suzuki, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 194.
  17. M. J. Dolan, F. Kahlhoefer, and C. McCabe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 101801 (2018).
  18. N. F. Bell, J. B. Dent, J. L. Newstead, S. Sabharwal, and T. J. Weiler, Phys. Rev. D 101, 015012 (2020).
  19. R. Essig, J. Pradler, M. Sholapurkar, and T.-T. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 021801 (2020).
  20. S. Kang, S. Scopel, and G. Tomar, arXiv:2407.16187.
  21. N. F. Bell, P. Cox, M. J. Dolan, J. L. Newstead, and A. C. Ritter, Phys. Rev. D 109, L091902 (2024).
  22. R. Essig, J. Mardon, and T. Volansky, Phys. Rev. D 85, 076007 (2012).
  23. Y. Kahn and T. Lin, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 066901 (2022).
  24. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 241803 (2019).
  25. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 101001 (2023).
  26. D. Huang et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 191002 (2023).
  27. P. Adari et al. (SENSEI Collaboration), arXiv:2312.13342.
  28. M. S. Rapaport, F. Asaro, and I. Perlman, Phys. Rev. C 11, 1746 (1975).
  29. M. S. Rapaport, F. Asaro, and I. Perlman, Phys. Rev. C 11, 1740 (1975).
  30. H. J. Fischbeck and M. S. Freedman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 173 (1975).
  31. H. J. Fischbeck and M. S. Freedman, Phys. Rev. A 15, 162 (1977).
  32. F. Boehm and C. S. Wu, Phys. Rev. 93, 518 (1954).
  33. C. Couratin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 243201 (2012).
  34. J. Xu et al., Phys. Rev. D 109, L051101 (2024).
  35. H. M. Araújo et al. (MIGDAL Collaboration), Astropart. Phys. 151, 102853 (2023).
  36. G. Grilli di Cortona, A. Messina, and S. Piacentini, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 034.
  37. U. K. Dey, T. N. Maity, and T. S. Ray, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135900 (2020).
  38. K. D. Nakamura et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 013C01 (2021).
  39. N. F. Bell et al., Phys. Rev. D 104, 076013 (2021).
  40. J. Liao, H. Liu, and D. Marfatia, Phys. Rev. D 104, 015005 (2021).
  41. N. F. Bell, J. B. Dent, R. F. Lang, J. L. Newstead, and A. C. Ritter, Phys. Rev. D 105, 096015 (2022).
  42. Z.-L. Liang, C. Mo, F. Zheng, and P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043004 (2022); 106, 109901(E) (2022).
  43. C. Blanco, I. Harris, Y. Kahn, B. Lillard, and J. Pérez-Ríos, Phys. Rev. D 106, 115015 (2022).
  44. G. Tomar, S. Kang, and S. Scopel, Astropart. Phys. 150, 102851 (2023).
  45. S. Chatterjee and R. Laha, Phys. Rev. D 107, 083036 (2023).
  46. D. Adams, D. Baxter, H. Day, R. Essig, and Y. Kahn, Phys. Rev. D 107, L041303 (2023).
  47. J. Li, L. Su, L. Wu, and B. Zhu, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2023) 020.
  48. M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, and C. Giunti, Phys. Lett. B 852, 138627 (2024).
  49. Y. Gu, J. Tang, L. Wu, and B. Zhu, Chin. Phys. C 47, 125105 (2023).
  50. Y.-F. Li and S.-y. Xia, Nucl. Phys. B1006, 116632 (2024).
  51. Y. Kahn and J. Pérez-Ríos, Phys. Rev. D 110, 092012 (2024).
  52. Z. Bo et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 191001 (2024).
  53. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 191002 (2024).
  54. G. Herrera, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 288.
  55. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (DAMIC Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 062003 (2022).
  56. L. Barak et al. (SENSEI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 014022 (2022).
  57. P. Du, D. Egaña Ugrinovic, R. Essig, and M. Sholapurkar, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 164.
  58. P. Du, D. Egana-Ugrinovic, R. Essig, and M. Sholapurkar, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011009 (2022).
  59. D. Z. Freedman, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1389 (1974).
  60. W. J. Marciano and Z. Parsa, J. Phys. G 29, 2629 (2003).
  61. E. Aprile et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 081302 (2006).
  62. K. J. McGuire et al., Phys. Rev. D 110, 043008 (2024).
  63. C. A. J. O’Hare, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 251802 (2021).
  64. P. Cox, M. J. Dolan, C. McCabe, and H. M. Quiney, Phys. Rev. D 107, 035032 (2023).
  65. Z.-L. Liang, L. Zhang, F. Zheng, and P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 102, 043007 (2020).
  66. C. P. Liu, C.-P. Wu, H.-C. Chi, and J.-W. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 102, 121303 (2020).
  67. S. Knapen, J. Kozaczuk, and T. Lin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 081805 (2021).
  68. Z.-L. Liang, C. Mo, F. Zheng, and P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 104, 056009 (2021).
  69. K. V. Berghaus, A. Esposito, R. Essig, and M. Sholapurkar, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 023.
  70. S. Knapen, J. Kozaczuk, and T. Lin, Phys. Rev. D 105, 015014 (2022).
  71. N. W. Evans, C. A. J. O’Hare, and C. McCabe, Phys. Rev. D 99, 023012 (2019).
  72. T. N. Maity and R. Laha, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 200.
  73. T. N. Maity, T. S. Ray, and S. Sarkar, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1005 (2021).
  74. J. Lindhard, V. Nielsen, M. Scharff, and P. Thomsen, Mat. Fys. Medd. K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk 33, 1 (1963).
  75. R. Essig, M. Sholapurkar, and T.-T. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 97, 095029 (2018).
  76. D. Baxter, Y. Kahn, and G. Krnjaic, Phys. Rev. D 101, 076014 (2020).
  77. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 104, 082005 (2021).
  78. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide-50 Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 322 (2023).
  79. R. Essig et al., J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 046.
  80. C. A. J. O’Hare, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063024 (2020).
  81. J. Erler and R. Ferro-Hernández, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 196.
  82. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  83. P. J. Brown, A. G. Fox, E. N. Maslen, M. A. O’Keefe, and B. T. M. Willis, International Tables for Crystallography, 554 (2006).
  84. T. N. Maity and C. Boehm, arXiv:2409.04385.
  85. J. Monroe and P. Fisher, Phys. Rev. D 76, 033007 (2007).
  86. L. E. Strigari, New J. Phys. 11, 105011 (2009).
  87. A. Gutlein et al., Astropart. Phys. 34, 90 (2010).
  88. J. Billard, L. Strigari, and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, Phys. Rev. D 89, 023524 (2014).
  89. A. Gütlein et al., Astropart. Phys. 69, 44 (2015).
  90. C. A. J. O’Hare, Phys. Rev. D 94, 063527 (2016).
  91. J. Wyenberg and I. M. Shoemaker, Phys. Rev. D 97, 115026 (2018).
  92. B. Carew, A. R. Caddell, T. N. Maity, and C. A. J. O’Hare, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083016 (2024).
  93. Z. Z. Liu et al. (CDEX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 052005 (2022).
  94. E. Armengaud et al., Phys. Rev. D 106, 062004 (2022).
  95. A. H. Abdelhameed et al. (CRESST Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 102002 (2019).
  96. D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 131301 (2019).
  97. R. Agnese et al. (SuperCDMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 071301 (2016).
  98. Q. Arnaud et al. (NEWS-G Collaboration), Astropart. Phys. 97, 54 (2018).
  99. J. I. Collar, Phys. Rev. D 98, 023005 (2018).
  100. T. N. Maity and R. Laha, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 117 (2024).
  101. K. Abe et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 031802 (2023); 131, 159903(E) (2023).
  102. M. S. Mahdawi and G. R. Farrar, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2018) 007.
  103. M. A. Buen-Abad, R. Essig, D. McKeen, and Y.-M. Zhong, Phys. Rep. 961, 1 (2022).
  104. K. K. Rogers, C. Dvorkin, and H. V. Peiris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 171301 (2022).
  105. A. Das, N. Kurinsky, and R. K. Leane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 121801 (2024).
  106. A. Das, N. Kurinsky, and R. K. Leane, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 233.
  107. G. Adhikari et al. (COSINE-100 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, 042006 (2022).
  108. J. L. Feng and J. Smolinsky, Phys. Rev. D 96, 095022 (2017).
  109. C. Boehm and P. Fayet, Nucl. Phys. B683, 219 (2004).
  110. E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 251301 (2015).
  111. R. Essig et al., Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: The landscape of low-threshold dark matter direct detection in the next decade, in Snowmass 2021 (2022); arXiv:2203.08297.
  112. T. Binder, S. Chakraborti, S. Matsumoto, and Y. Watanabe, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 106.
  113. S. Balan et al., arXiv:2405.17548.
  114. F. Acerbi et al. (DarkSide-20k Collaboration), Commun. Phys. 7, 422 (2024).
  115. J. Aalbers et al. (XLZD Collaboration), arXiv:2410.17137.
  116. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (Oscura Collaboration), arXiv:2202.10518.
  117. S. E. Vahsen et al., arXiv:2008.12587.
  118. A. Abdukerim et al. (PANDA-X, PandaX Collaborations), Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 221011 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation