Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Understanding the low-lying Ωc structures from a coupled-channel perspective

Ying Zhang1,2,3, Qing-Fu Song4, Qi-Fang Lü1,2,3,*, Hideko Nagahiro5,6,†, and Atsushi Hosaka6,7,8,‡

  • *Contact author: lvqifang@hunnu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: nagahiro@rcnp.osaka-u.ac.jp
  • ‡Contact author: hosaka@rcnp.osaka-u.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 112, 034035 – Published 27 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/grxl-nwwy

Abstract

We perform a systematic analysis of the low-lying Ωc structures in a coupled-channel approach. The couplings between meson-baryon channels, ΞcK¯, Ξc′K¯, Ξc*K¯, Ωcη, and Ωc*η, and three-quark bare states Ωc(1Pλ) are considered. We predict a bound state Ωc(2954) below the ΞcK¯ threshold with (JP,j)=(1/2−,0), which can be studied in the final states of Ωc(*)π and Ωc(*)γ. Also, the resonances Ωc(3000) and Ωc(3050) can be classified as the lower (JP,j)=(1/2−,1) and (JP,j)=(3/2−,1) states, respectively. Our present assignments based on this coupled-channel perspective are significantly different from those of the traditional three-quark picture and of the molecular scenario. The future BelleII and LHCb experiments can search for the bound state Ωc(2954) and measure the spin-parities of particles Ωc(3000) and Ωc(3050) to test our predictions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (100)

  1. H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, A review of the open charm and open bottom systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076201 (2017).
  2. H. Y. Cheng, Charmed baryon physics circa 2021, Chin. J. Phys. (Taipei) 78, 324 (2022).
  3. H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023).
  4. J. Nieves, A. Feijoo, M. Albaladejo, and M. L. Du, Lowest-lying 12− and 32−  ΛQ resonances: From the strange to the bottom sectors, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 137, 104118 (2024).
  5. V. Crede and J. Yelton, 70 years of hyperon spectroscopy: A review of strange Ξ, Ω baryons, and the spectrum of charmed and bottom baryons, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 106301 (2024).
  6. N. A. Tornqvist and P. Zenczykowski, Ground-state baryon mass splittings from unitarity, Phys. Rev. D 29, 2139 (1984).
  7. B. Silvestre- Brac and C. Gignoux, Unitary effects in spin orbit splitting of P wave baryons, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3699 (1991).
  8. D. S. Hwang and D. W. Kim, Mass of DsJ*(2317) and coupled-channel effect, Phys. Lett. B 601, 137 (2004).
  9. M. R. Pennington and D. J. Wilson, Decay channels and charmonium mass shifts, Phys. Rev. D 76, 077502 (2007).
  10. T. Barnes and E. S. Swanson, Hadron loops: General theorems and application to charmonium, Phys. Rev. C 77, 055206 (2008).
  11. B. Q. Li, C. Meng, and K. T. Chao, Coupled-channel and screening effects in charmonium spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 80, 014012 (2009).
  12. Z. Y. Zhou and Z. Xiao, Hadron loops effect on mass shifts of the charmed and charmed-strange spectra, Phys. Rev. D 84, 034023 (2011).
  13. J. F. Liu and G. J. Ding, Bottomonium spectrum with coupled-channel effects, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1981 (2012).
  14. H. Nagahiro, K. Nawa, S. Ozaki, D. Jido, and A. Hosaka, Composite and elementary natures of a1(1260) meson, Phys. Rev. D 83, 111504 (2011).
  15. H. Nagahiro and A. Hosaka, Composite and elementary nature of a resonance in the σ model, Phys. Rev. C 88, 055203 (2013).
  16. H. Nagahiro and A. Hosaka, Elementarity of composite systems, Phys. Rev. C 90, 065201 (2014).
  17. Q. F. Lü, H. Nagahiro, and A. Hosaka, Understanding the nature of Ω(2012) in a coupled-channel approach, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014025 (2023).
  18. J. Ferretti, G. Galatà, and E. Santopinto, Quark structure of the X(3872) and χb(3P) resonances, Phys. Rev. D 90, 054010 (2014).
  19. Z. W. Liu, J. M. M. Hall, D. B. Leinweber, A. W. Thomas, and J. J. Wu, Structure of the Λ(1405) from Hamiltonian effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 95, 014506 (2017).
  20. Y. Lu, M. N. Anwar, and B. S. Zou, How large is the contribution of excited mesons in coupled-channel effects?, Phys. Rev. D 95, 034018 (2017).
  21. S. Q. Luo, B. Chen, Z. W. Liu, and X. Liu, Resolving the low mass puzzle of Λc(2940)+, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 301 (2020).
  22. S. Q. Luo, B. Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Predicting a new resonance as charmed-strange baryonic analog of Ds0*(2317), Phys. Rev. D 103, 074027 (2021).
  23. J. M. Xie, M. Z. Liu, and L. S. Geng, Ds0(2590) as a dominant cs¯ state with a small D*K component, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094051 (2021).
  24. R. H. Ni, Q. Li, and X. H. Zhong, Mass spectra and strong decays of charmed and charmed-strange mesons, Phys. Rev. D 105, 056006 (2022).
  25. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Coupled channel approach to the structure of the X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 81, 054023 (2010).
  26. Z. Yang, G. J. Wang, J. J. Wu, M. Oka, and S. L. Zhu, Novel coupled channel framework connecting the quark model and lattice QCD for the near-threshold Ds States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 11 (2022).
  27. Z. L. Zhang, Z. W. Liu, S. Q. Luo, F. L. Wang, B. Wang, and H. Xu, Λc(2910) and Λc(2940) as conventional baryons dressed with the D*N channel, Phys. Rev. D 107, 034036 (2023).
  28. Y. Yamaguchi, A. Hosaka, S. Takeuchi, and M. Takizawa, Heavy hadronic molecules with pion exchange and quark core couplings: A guide for practitioners, J. Phys. G 47, 053001 (2020).
  29. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of five new narrow Ωc0 states decaying to Ξc+K−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 182001 (2017).
  30. J. Yelton et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of excited Ωc charmed baryons in e+e− collisions, Phys. Rev. D 97, 051102 (2018).
  31. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of excited Ωc0 baryons in Ωb−→Ξc+K−π− decays, Phys. Rev. D 104, L091102 (2021).
  32. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of new Ωc0 states decaying to the Ξc+K− final state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 131902 (2023).
  33. H. X. Chen, Q. Mao, W. Chen, A. Hosaka, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Decay properties of P-wave charmed baryons from light-cone QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 95, 094008 (2017).
  34. M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Very narrow excited Ωc baryons, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114012 (2017).
  35. K. L. Wang, L. Y. Xiao, X. H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Understanding the newly observed Ωc states through their decays, Phys. Rev. D 95, 116010 (2017).
  36. W. Wang and R. L. Zhu, Interpretation of the newly observed Ωc0 resonances, Phys. Rev. D 96, 014024 (2017).
  37. M. Padmanath and N. Mathur, Quantum numbers of recently discovered Ωc0 baryons from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 042001 (2017).
  38. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, Quantum numbers of Ωc states and other charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 95, 094018 (2017).
  39. Z. G. Wang, Analysis of Ωc(3000), Ωc(3050), Ωc(3066), Ωc(3090) and Ωc(3119) with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 325 (2017).
  40. Z. Zhao, D. D. Ye, and A. Zhang, Hadronic decay properties of newly observed Ωc baryons, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114024 (2017).
  41. B. Chen and X. Liu, New Ωc0 baryons discovered by LHCb as the members of 1P and 2S states, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094015 (2017).
  42. G. L. Yu, Z. Y. Li, Z. G. Wang, J. Lu, and M. Yan, Systematic analysis of single heavy baryons ΛQ, ΣQ and ΩQ, Nucl. Phys. B990, 116183 (2023).
  43. S. Q. Luo and X. Liu, Newly observed Ωc(3327): A good candidate for a D−wave charmed baryon, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074041 (2023).
  44. Y. X. Peng, S. Q. Luo, and X. Liu, Refining radiative decay studies in singly heavy baryons, Phys. Rev. D 110, 074034 (2024).
  45. S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, and H. Sundu, Interpretation of the new Ωc0 states via their mass and width, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 395 (2017).
  46. K. L. Wang, Y. X. Yao, X. H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Strong and radiative decays of the low-lying S- and P-wave singly heavy baryons, Phys. Rev. D 96, 116016 (2017).
  47. K. Chen, Y. Dong, X. Liu, Q. F. Lü, and T. Matsuki, Regge-like relation and a universal description of heavy–light systems, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 20 (2018).
  48. E. Santopinto, A. Giachino, J. Ferretti, H. García-Tecocoatzi, M. A. Bedolla, R. Bijker, and E. Ortiz-Pacheco, The Ωc-puzzle solved by means of quark model predictions, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 1012 (2019).
  49. K. Gandhi and A. K. Rai, Spectrum of strange singly charmed baryons in the constituent quark model, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 213 (2020).
  50. H. Garcilazo, J. Vijande, and A. Valcarce, Faddeev study of heavy baryon spectroscopy, J. Phys. G 34, 961 (2007).
  51. D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Spectroscopy and Regge trajectories of heavy baryons in the relativistic quark-diquark picture, Phys. Rev. D 84, 014025 (2011).
  52. R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Heavy baryon spectroscopy in the relativistic quark model, Particles 3, 234 (2020).
  53. H. Bahtiyar, K. U. Can, G. Erkol, P. Gubler, M. Oka, and T. T. Takahashi, Charmed baryon spectrum from lattice QCD near the physical point, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054513 (2020).
  54. D. J. Jia, J. H. Pan, and C. Q. Pang, A mixing coupling scheme for spectra of singly heavy baryons with spin-1 diquarks in P-waves, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 434 (2021).
  55. B. Chen, S. Q. Luo, and X. Liu, Universal behavior of mass gaps existing in the single heavy baryon family, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 474 (2021).
  56. M. V. Polyakov and M. Praszalowicz, Landscape of heavy baryons from the perspective of the chiral quark-soliton model, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094004 (2022).
  57. H. Garcia-Tecocoatzi, A. Giachino, J. Li, A. Ramirez-Morales, and E. Santopinto, Strong decay widths and mass spectra of charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 107, 034031 (2023).
  58. G. L. Yu, Y. Meng, Z. Y. Li, Z. G. Wang, and L. Jie, Strong decay properties of single heavy baryons ΛQ, ΣQ and ΩQ, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38, 2350082 (2023).
  59. Z. G. Wang, F. Lu, and Y. Liu, Analysis of the D−wave Σ-type charmed baryon states with the QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 689 (2023).
  60. J. Oudichhya and A. K. Rai, Spin-parity identification of newly observed singly charmed baryons in Regge phenomenology, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 123 (2023).
  61. E. Ortiz-Pacheco and R. Bijker, Masses and radiative decay widths of S- and P-wave singly, doubly, and triply heavy charm and bottom baryons, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054014 (2023).
  62. J. H. Pan and J. Pan, Investigation of the mass spectra of singly heavy baryons ΣQ, ΞQ′, and ΩQ(Q=c,b) in the Regge trajectory model, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076010 (2024).
  63. Z. Y. Li, G. L. Yu, Z. G. Wang, and J. Z. Gu, Heavy-quark dominance and fine structure of excited heavy baryons ΣQ, ΞQ′ and ΩQ, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1310 (2024).
  64. X. Z. Weng, W. Z. Deng, and S. L. Zhu, Heavy baryons in the relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056052 (2024).
  65. E. Ortiz-Pacheco and R. Bijker, Strong decay widths of S- and P-wave singly-, doubly- and triply-heavy charm and bottom baryons, arXiv:2410.09622.
  66. H. H. Zhong, M. S. Liu, L. Y. Xiao, K. L. Wang, Qi-Li, and X. H. Zhong, Ωc baryon spectrum and strong decays in a constituent quark model, arXiv:2502.13741.
  67. G. Yang and J. Ping, Dynamical study of Ωc0 in the chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034023 (2018).
  68. H. Huang, J. Ping, and F. Wang, Investigating the excited Ωc0 states through ΞcK and Ξc′K decay channels, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034027 (2018).
  69. H. C. Kim, M. V. Polyakov, and M. Praszałowicz, Possibility of the existence of charmed exotica, Phys. Rev. D 96, 014009 (2017).
  70. Y. Liu and I. Zahed, Heavy and strange holographic baryons, Phys. Rev. D 96, 056027 (2017).
  71. C. S. An and H. Chen, Observed Ωc0 resonances as pentaquark states, Phys. Rev. D 96, 034012 (2017).
  72. H. C. Kim, M. V. Polyakov, M. Praszalowicz, and G. S. Yang, Strong decays of exotic and nonexotic heavy baryons in the chiral quark-soliton model, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094021 (2017); 97, 039901(E) (2018).
  73. G. Montaña, A. Feijoo, and À. Ramos, A meson-baryon molecular interpretation for some Ωc excited states, Eur. Phys. J. A 54, 64 (2018).
  74. V. R. Debastiani, J. M. Dias, W. H. Liang, and E. Oset, Molecular Ωc states generated from coupled meson-baryon channels, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094035 (2018).
  75. C. Wang, L. L. Liu, X. W. Kang, X. H. Guo, and R. W. Wang, Possible open-charmed pentaquark molecule Ωc(3188)—the DΞ bound state—in the Bethe-Salpeter formalism, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 407 (2018).
  76. R. Chen, A. Hosaka, and X. Liu, Searching for possible Ωc-like molecular states from meson-baryon interaction, Phys. Rev. D 97, 036016 (2018).
  77. J. Nieves, R. Pavao, and L. Tolos, Ωc excited states within a SU(6)lsf×HQSS model, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 114 (2018).
  78. Y. Huang, C. J. Xiao, Q. F. Lü, R. Wang, J. He, and L. S. Geng, Strong and radiative decays of DΞ molecular state and newly observed Ωc states, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094013 (2018).
  79. V. R. Debastiani, J. M. Dias, W. H. Liang, and E. Oset, Ωb−→(Ξc+K−)π− and the Ωc states, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094022 (2018).
  80. Z. G. Wang and J. X. Zhang, Possible pentaquark candidates: New excited Ωc states, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 503 (2018).
  81. H. G. Xu, G. Chen, Y. L. Yan, D. M. Zhou, L. Zheng, Y. L. Xie, Z. L. She, and B. H. Sa, Study on the Ωc0 states decaying to Ξc+K− in pp collisions at s=7, 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 102, 054319 (2020).
  82. J. T. Zhu, S. Y. Kong, L. Q. Song, and J. He, Systematical study of Ωc−like molecular states from interactions Ξc(′,*)K¯(*) and Ξ(*)D(*), Phys. Rev. D 105, 094036 (2022).
  83. Q. Xin, X. S. Yang, and Z. G. Wang, The singly charmed pentaquark molecular states via the QCD sum rules, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38, 2350123 (2023).
  84. Y. Yan, X. Hu, H. Huang, and J. Ping, Investigating excited Ωc states from pentaquark perspective, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094045 (2023).
  85. U. Özdem, Magnetic dipole moments of theΩc(3185)0 and Ωc(3327)0 states from molecular perspective, Phys. Lett. B 849, 138432 (2024).
  86. B. Wang, K. Chen, L. Meng, and S. L. Zhu, Spectrum of the molecular pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 109, 074035 (2024).
  87. N. Ikeno, W. H. Liang, and E. Oset, Molecular nature of the Ωc(3120) and its analogy with the Ω(2012), Phys. Rev. D 109, 054023 (2024).
  88. W. Roberts and M. Pervin, Heavy baryons in a quark model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23, 2817 (2008).
  89. T. Yoshida, E. Hiyama, A. Hosaka, M. Oka, and K. Sadato, Spectrum of heavy baryons in the quark model, Phys. Rev. D 92, 114029 (2015).
  90. Q. F. Song, Q. F. Lü, and A. Hosaka, Bottom-charmed baryons in a nonrelativistic quark model, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 89 (2024).
  91. M. S. Liu, K. L. Wang, Q. F. Lü, and X. H. Zhong, Ω baryon spectrum and their decays in a constituent quark model, Phys. Rev. D 101, 016002 (2020).
  92. A. J. Arifi, D. Suenaga, A. Hosaka, and Y. Oh, Strong decays of multistrangeness baryon resonances in the quark model, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094006 (2022).
  93. A. J. Arifi, H. Nagahiro, and A. Hosaka, Three-body decay of Λc*(2595) and Λc*(2625) with consideration of Σc(2455)π and Σc*(2520)π in intermediate states, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114018 (2017).
  94. H. Nagahiro, S. Yasui, A. Hosaka, M. Oka, and H. Noumi, Structure of charmed baryons studied by pionic decays, Phys. Rev. D 95, 014023 (2017).
  95. Y. L. Shu, Q. F. Song, and Q. F. Lü, Strong decays of P−wave doubly charmed and bottom baryons, arXiv:2408.11578.
  96. S. Weinberg, Algebraic realizations of chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. 177, 2604 (1969).
  97. X. H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, Charmed baryon strong decays in a chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. D 77, 074008 (2008).
  98. W. Liang, Q. F. Lü, and X. H. Zhong, Canonical interpretation of the newly observed Λb(6146)0 and Λb(6152)0 via strong decay behaviors, Phys. Rev. D 100, 054013 (2019).
  99. W. Liang and Q. F. Lü, Strong decays of the newly observed narrow Ωb structures, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 198 (2020).
  100. Y. Zhang, Q.-F. Song, Q.-F. Lü, H. Nagahiro, and A. Hosaka, Pole positions as functions of the cutoff parameter and three-quark bare masses, 10.5281/zenodo.16812983 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation