Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Axionlike particles and sterile neutrinos solve the B→Kνν¯ and B→πK puzzles

Bhubanjyoti Bhattacharya1,*, Alakabha Datta2,†, Girish Kumar3,‡, and Danny Marfatia4,§

  • *Contact author: bbhattach@ltu.edu
  • †Contact author: datta@phy.olemiss.edu
  • ‡Contact author: girish89@sc.edu
  • §Contact author: dmarf8@hawaii.edu

Phys. Rev. D 114, 035046 – Published 31 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/gd5l-gjrz

Abstract

The recent measurement of the branching ratio of B+→K++inv (where “inv” denotes invisible states) by the Belle II Collaboration is enhanced relative to the standard model expectation by 2.7σ. An older puzzle persists in measurements of the branching ratios and CP asymmetries of B→πK decays. We address these two anomalies in flavor-changing neutral current B decays, with a short-lived axionlike particle (ALP) with mass close to that of the π0. In the model with the minimum number of new couplings, the ALP has couplings to the photon, top quark and a heavy sterile neutrino. The ALP contributes to the B→π0K decays by mixing with the π0. It contributes to B+→K++inv by its off-shell coupling to sterile neutrino pairs. The model can explain the excess in the total rate, but not the observed distribution of signal events. We make predictions for all B→K(*)+inv modes and for the rare kaon decays, K+→π++inv and KL→π0+inv. We find an appreciable contribution to the magnetic moment of the muon, and negligible contributions to the magnetic moment of the electron and b→se+e−.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (50)

  1. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Evidence for B+→K+νν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112006 (2024).
  2. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  3. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of CP violation in two-body B(s)0-meson decays to charged pions and kaons, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 075.
  4. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Measurement of branching fractions and direct CP asymmetries for B→Kπ and B→ππ decays at Belle II, Phys. Rev. D 109, 012001 (2024).
  5. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Measurement of CP violation in B0→KS0π0 decays at Belle II, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 111803 (2023).
  6. B. Bhattacharya, A. Datta, D. Marfatia, S. Nandi, and J. Waite, Axionlike particles resolve the B→πK and g−2 anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 104, L051701 (2021).
  7. W. Altmannshofer and S. Roy, Joint explanation of the B→πK puzzle and the B→Kνν¯ excess, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075029 (2025).
  8. W. G. Parrott, C. Bouchard, and C. T. H. Davies (HPQCD Collaboration), Standard model predictions for B→Kℓ+ℓ−, B→Kℓ1+ℓ2− and B→Kνν¯ using form factors from Nf=2+1+1 lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014511 (2023); (HPQCD Collaboration)Phys. Rev. D107, 119903(E) (2023).
  9. G. Finauri and P. Gambino, The q2 moments in inclusive semileptonic B decays, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 206.
  10. M. Fael, M. Prim, and K. K. Vos, Inclusive B→Xcℓν¯ℓ and B→Xuℓν¯ℓ decays: Current status and future prospects, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 233, 325 (2024).
  11. S. Banerjee et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV) Collaboration), Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2023, Phys. Rev. D 113, 012008 (2026).
  12. L. Vittorio, The precision era of flavour physics: From hadronic form factors to dark matter, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 140, 590 (2025).
  13. S. Alibocus et al. (NA62 Collaboration), Measurement of the branching ratio of the K+→π+νν¯ decay, arXiv:2607.16413.
  14. A. J. Buras and E. Venturini, The exclusive vision of rare K and B decays and of the quark mixing in the standard model, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 615 (2022).
  15. G. D’Ambrosio, A. M. Iyer, F. Mahmoudi, and S. Neshatpour, Anatomy of kaon decays and prospects for lepton flavour universality violation, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 148.
  16. A. Datta, D. Marfatia, and L. Mukherjee, B→Kνν¯, MiniBooNE and muon g−2 anomalies from a dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 109, L031701 (2024).
  17. W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia, and J. Martin Camalich, Light new physics in B→K(*)νν¯?, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075008 (2024).
  18. J. Alda, M. Fuentes Zamoro, L. Merlo, X. Ponce Díaz, and S. Rigolin, Comprehensive ALP searches in meson decays, arXiv:2507.19578.
  19. S. Baek, P. Hamel, D. London, A. Datta, and D. A. Suprun, The B→πK puzzle and new physics, Phys. Rev. D 71, 057502 (2005).
  20. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
  21. B. Bhattacharya, M. Bouchard, A. Jean, D. London, and I. Ray, Isospin-based EWP-tree relations, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2026) 195.
  22. M. Gronau, A precise sum rule among four B→K pi CP asymmetries, Phys. Lett. B 627, 82 (2005).
  23. M. Bauer, M. Neubert, and A. Thamm, Collider probes of axion-like particles, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2017) 044.
  24. N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Dispersive analysis of B→K(*) and Bs→ϕ form factors, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 153.
  25. M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel, and A. Thamm, The low-energy effective theory of axions and ALPs, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 063.
  26. A. Bharucha, D. M. Straub, and R. Zwicky, B→Vℓ+ℓ− in the standard model from light-cone sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2015) 098.
  27. G. Alonso-Álvarez and M. Escudero Abenza, The first limit on invisible decays of Bs mesons comes from LEP, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 553 (2024).
  28. R. Barate et al. (ALEPH Collaboration), Measurements of BR(b→τ−ν¯τX) and BR(b→τ−ν¯τD*±X) and upper limits on BR(B−→τ−ν¯τ) and BR(b→sνν¯), Eur. Phys. J. C 19, 213 (2001).
  29. B. Bhattacharya, C. M. Grant, and A. A. Petrov, Invisible widths of heavy mesons, Phys. Rev. D 99, 093010 (2019).
  30. J. Redeker (KOTO Collaboration), The search for KL→π0νν¯ in the KOTO experiment, Proc. Sci. ICHEP2024 (2025) 467.
  31. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), Measurement of the very rare K+→π+νν¯ decay, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 093.
  32. J. K. Ahn et al. (KOTO Collaboration), Search for the KL→π0νν¯ decay at the J-PARC KOTO experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 081802 (2025).
  33. V. Bernard, M. Oertel, E. Passemar, and J. Stern, Dispersive representation and shape of the Kl3 form factors: Robustness, Phys. Rev. D 80, 034034 (2009).
  34. M. Antonelli et al. (FlaviaNet Working Group on Kaon Decays), An evaluation of |Vus| and precise tests of the standard model from world data on leptonic and semileptonic kaon decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 69, 399 (2010).
  35. Z. Bai et al. (RBC and UKQCD Collaborations), Standard model prediction for direct CP violation in K→ππ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 212001 (2015).
  36. R. Abbott et al. (RBC and UKQCD Collaborations), Direct CP violation and the ΔI=1/2 rule in K→ππ decay from the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054509 (2020).
  37. M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel, and A. Thamm, Axionlike particles, lepton-flavor violation, and a new explanation of aμ and ae, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 211803 (2020).
  38. M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel, and A. Thamm, Flavor probes of axion-like particles, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 056.
  39. H. Dembinski, P. Ongmongkolkul et al., scikit-hep/iminuit, 10.5281/zenodo.3949207 (2020).
  40. F. James and M. Roos, minuit: A system for function minimization and analysis of the parameter errors and correlations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 10, 343 (1975).
  41. M. Beneke, T. Huber, and X.-Q. Li, NNLO vertex corrections to non-leptonic B decays: Tree amplitudes, Nucl. Phys. B832, 109 (2010).
  42. D. M. Straub, flavio: A python package for flavour and precision phenomenology in the Standard Model and beyond, arXiv:1810.08132.
  43. P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, Impact of new invisible particles on B→K(*)Emiss observables, Phys. Rev. D 112, 035010 (2025).
  44. C. Praz, Search for B→Kvv decays with a machine learning method at the Belle II experiment, Ph.D. thesis, University of Hamburg (main), Department of Mathematics, Hamburg, 2022.
  45. J. Grygier et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for B→hνν¯ decays with semileptonic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 96, 091101 (2017); (Belle Collaboration)Phys. Rev. D97, 099902(A) (2018).
  46. O. Lutz et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for B→h(*)νν¯ with the full Belle ϒ(4S) data sample, Phys. Rev. D 87, 111103 (2013).
  47. X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra, and G. Gabrielse, Measurement of the electron magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 071801 (2023).
  48. R. Aliberti et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model: An update, Phys. Rep. 1143, 1 (2025).
  49. L. Morel, Z. Yao, P. Cladé, and S. Guellati-Khélifa, Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion, Nature (London) 588, 61 (2020).
  50. R. H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey, and H. Müller, Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the standard model, Science 360, 191 (2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation