- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Closing in on singly charged scalars

Snehadri Das1, Will Howe1, Brian Shuve2, David Tucker-Smith1, and Ruby Yager1

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 112, 055003 – Published 2 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/g885-wpr6

Abstract

We investigate current experimental constraints and future search prospects for a hypothetical SU(2)w and SU(3)c singlet spin-zero particle that carries unit electric charge: a singly charged scalar (SCS). In addition to providing useful benchmarks for collider searches, SCS particles are also well-motivated ingredients in relatively minimal dark sectors. We focus on scenarios in which the SCS decays promptly at colliders to a lepton plus either a neutrino or an invisible dark-sector particle of negligible mass. A promptly decaying SCS can easily have appreciable branching ratios to more than one lepton flavor while remaining consistent with constraints on lepton flavor violation. This broadens the allowed range of SCS masses to extend well beyond those for right-handed selectrons, smuons, or staus. For particular benchmark SCS branching ratios, we find that SCS masses above ∼185  GeV and in a lower-mass window ∼80–125  GeV are still allowed at 95% confidence level. We carry out Monte Carlo simulations to explore the potential of a boosted-decision-tree-based analysis to probe the surviving SCS parameter space in future searches at the (HL-)LHC, finding a significant increase in sensitivity relative to cut-based analyses both in the lower-mass window and at higher SCS masses.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (79)

  1. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 143.
  2. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 244.
  3. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 104, 112010 (2021).
  4. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 842, 137460 (2023).
  5. Q.-H. Cao, G. Li, K.-P. Xie, and J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 97, 115036 (2018).
  6. K. S. Babu, P. S. B. Dev, S. Jana, and A. Thapa, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 006.
  7. A. Crivellin, F. Kirk, C. A. Manzari, and L. Panizzi, Phys. Rev. D 103, 073002 (2021).
  8. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 150.
  9. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 012011 (2023).
  10. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 123 (2020).
  11. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 123.
  12. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 790, 140 (2019).
  13. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2014) 071.
  14. LEP2 SUSY Working Group, https://lepsusy.web.cern.ch/lepsusy/.
  15. J. McDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 091304 (2002).
  16. L. J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell, and S. M. West, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 080.
  17. N. Bernal, M. Heikinheimo, T. Tenkanen, K. Tuominen, and V. Vaskonen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, 1730023 (2017).
  18. J. Berman, B. Shuve, and D. Tucker-Smith, Phys. Rev. D 105, 095027 (2022).
  19. P. Asadi, A. Radick, and T.-T. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 110, 035022 (2024).
  20. K. Perez, K. C. Y. Ng, J. F. Beacom, C. Hersh, S. Horiuchi, and R. Krivonos, Phys. Rev. D 95, 123002 (2017).
  21. A. Neronov, D. Malyshev, and D. Eckert, Phys. Rev. D 94, 123504 (2016).
  22. K. C. Y. Ng, B. M. Roach, K. Perez, J. F. Beacom, S. Horiuchi, R. Krivonos, and D. R. Wik, Phys. Rev. D 99, 083005 (2019).
  23. F. Calore, A. Dekker, P. D. Serpico, and T. Siegert, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 520, 4167 (2023).
  24. A. R. Pullen, R.-R. Chary, and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. D 76, 063006 (2007); 83, 029904(E) (2011).
  25. R. Essig, E. Kuflik, S. D. McDermott, T. Volansky, and K. M. Zurek, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 193.
  26. A. Albert, G. A. Gomez-Vargas, M. Grefe, C. Munoz, C. Weniger, E. D. Bloom, E. Charles, M. N. Mazziotta, and A. Morselli (Fermi-LAT Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2014) 023.
  27. W. L. Xu, J. B. Muñoz, and C. Dvorkin, Phys. Rev. D 105, 095029 (2022).
  28. P. Agrawal, S. Blanchet, Z. Chacko, and C. Kilic, Phys. Rev. D 86, 055002 (2012).
  29. B. Batell, T. Lin, and L.-T. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 075.
  30. Y. Bai and J. Berger, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2014) 153.
  31. S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson, and M. Luty, Phys. Rev. D 90, 015011 (2014).
  32. P. Agrawal, B. Batell, D. Hooper, and T. Lin, Phys. Rev. D 90, 063512 (2014).
  33. P. Agrawal, M. Blanke, and K. Gemmler, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 072.
  34. P. Agrawal, Z. Chacko, C. Kilic, and C. B. Verhaaren, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2015) 072.
  35. P. Agrawal, Z. Chacko, E. C. F. S. Fortes, and C. Kilic, Phys. Rev. D 93, 103510 (2016).
  36. P. Agrawal, C. Kilic, S. Swaminathan, and C. Trendafilova, Phys. Rev. D 95, 015031 (2017).
  37. N. Desai, C. Kilic, Y.-P. Yang, and T. Youn, Phys. Rev. D 101, 075043 (2020).
  38. H. Acaroğlu, P. Agrawal, and M. Blanke, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 106.
  39. ATLAS Collaboration, HEPData record 89413, 10.17182/hepdata.89413.v4.
  40. K. Cranmer, G. Lewis, L. Moneta, A. Shibata, and W. Verkerke (ROOT Collaboration), Report No. CERN-OPEN-2012-016, 2012, 10.17181/CERN-OPEN-2012-016.
  41. C. G. Lester and D. J. Summers, Phys. Lett. B 463, 99 (1999).
  42. A. Barr, C. Lester, and P. Stephens, J. Phys. G 29, 2343 (2003).
  43. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  44. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  45. C. Bierlich et al., 10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.8 (2022).
  46. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (delphes 3 Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  47. E. Conte, B. Fuks, and G. Serret, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 222 (2013).
  48. J. Y. Araz and B. Fuks, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 36, 2141005 (2021).
  49. LHC SUSY Cross Section Working Group, https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LHCPhysics/SUSYCrossSections13TeVslepslep.
  50. G. Bozzi, B. Fuks, and M. Klasen, Nucl. Phys. B777, 157 (2007).
  51. B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2480 (2013).
  52. B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 168.
  53. J. Fiaschi and M. Klasen, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 094.
  54. W. Beenakker, M. Klasen, M. Kramer, T. Plehn, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3780 (1999); 100, 029901(E) (2008).
  55. L. Heinrich, M. Feickert, G. Stark, and K. Cranmer, J. Open Source Software 6, 2823 (2021).
  56. A. L. Read, J. Phys. G 28, 2693 (2002).
  57. CMS Collaboration, Report No. CMS-PAS-SUS-23-002.
  58. ATLAS Collaboration, HEPData record 63216, 10.17182/hepdata.63216.
  59. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 995 (2018).
  60. ATLAS Collaboration, HEPData record 81996, 10.17182/hepdata.81996.v1.
  61. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 031.
  62. ATLAS Collaboration, HEPData record 134068, 10.17182/hepdata.134068.
  63. R. Barbier et al., Phys. Rep. 420, 1 (2005).
  64. A. M. Baldini et al. (MEG Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 434 (2016).
  65. W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O. M. Ogreid, and P. Osland, Nucl. Phys. B801, 81 (2008).
  66. A. Hoecker et al., arXiv:physics/0703039.
  67. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), arXiv:2503.17186.
  68. M. L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, and M. Treccani, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2007) 013.
  69. ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS-CONF-2018-038.
  70. M. Cacciari, M. Czakon, M. Mangano, A. Mitov, and P. Nason, Phys. Lett. B 710, 612 (2012).
  71. P. Bärnreuther, M. Czakon, and A. Mitov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 132001 (2012).
  72. M. Czakon and A. Mitov, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2012) 054.
  73. M. Czakon and A. Mitov, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 080.
  74. M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252004 (2013).
  75. S. Catani, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli, and H. Sargsyan, Phys. Rev. D 99, 051501 (2019).
  76. M. Czakon and A. Mitov, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2930 (2014).
  77. T. Gehrmann, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, P. Maierhöfer, A. von Manteuffel, S. Pozzorini, D. Rathlev, and L. Tancredi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 212001 (2014).
  78. M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, D. Rathlev, and M. Wiesemann, Phys. Lett. B 761, 179 (2016).
  79. F. Cascioli, T. Gehrmann, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, P. Maierhöfer, A. von Manteuffel, S. Pozzorini, D. Rathlev, L. Tancredi, and E. Weihs, Phys. Lett. B 735, 311 (2014).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 112, 055003– Published 2 September, 2025
  • Received 17 June 2025
  • Accepted 8 August 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation