Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Spectral signatures of heavy quarkonia in a rotating and anisotropic quark-gluon plasma: A holographic study

Xiang-Wei Shi1 and Sheng-Qin Feng1,2,3,*

  • *Contact author: fengsq@ctgu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 113, 096006 – Published 8 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/g3bt-51ll

Abstract

We investigate the in-medium spectral functions and effective masses of heavy quarkonia charmonium (J/Ψ) and bottomonium [ϒ(1S)] in a quark-gluon plasma (QGP) possessing both global rotation and spatial anisotropy. Using a gauge/gravity holographic model incorporating finite temperature, chemical potential, and warp factor, we compute the spectral signatures nonperturbatively. Our results show that both rotation and anisotropy enhance quarkonium dissociation, manifesting as peak suppression and width broadening in the spectral functions. Crucially, their effects are directional: anisotropy primarily dissociates longitudinally polarized states, while rotation more strongly disrupts transversely polarized ones. A competitive interplay exists: for small anisotropy, rotational effects dominate at high angular velocity, whereas for large anisotropy, anisotropy governs the dissociation regardless of rotation strength. Furthermore, rotation induces a nonmonotonic temperature dependence in the transverse effective mass of J/Ψ, while strong anisotropy causes similar nonmonotonicity in the longitudinal effective mass of J/Ψ. These findings reveal how the distinct symmetry breaking patterns induced by QGP rotation and anisotropy reshape the heavy quarkonium spectrum, providing new insights into polarization-dependent suppression in noncentral heavy-ion collisions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (70)

  1. K. Adcox et al. (PHENIX Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A757, 184 (2005).
  2. J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A757, 102 (2005).
  3. I. Arsene et al. (BRAHMS Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A757, 1 (2005).
  4. J. Deng and S.-Q. Feng, Phys. Rev. D 105, 026015 (2022).
  5. X. Chen, S.-Q. Feng, Y.-F. Shi, and Y. Zhong, Phys. Rev. D 97, 066015 (2018).
  6. X. Chen, L. Zhang, D. Li, D. Hou, and M. Huang, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 132.
  7. Z.-R. Zhu, S.-Q. Feng, Y.-F. Shi, and Y. Zhong, Phys. Rev. D 99, 126001 (2019).
  8. Y.-Q. Zhao and D. Hou, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1102 (2022).
  9. M. Fujita, T. Kikuchi, K. Fukushima, T. Misumi, and M. Murata, Phys. Rev. D 81, 065024 (2010).
  10. Y. Kim, J.-P. Lee, and S. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 75, 114008 (2007).
  11. N. R. F. Braga, L. F. Ferreira, and A. Vega, Phys. Lett. B 774, 476 (2017).
  12. S. S. Gubser, S. S. Pufu, and A. Yarom, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2008) 108.
  13. S. I. Finazzo and J. Noronha, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2015) 051.
  14. K. Hashimoto and D. E. Kharzeev, Phys. Rev. D 90, 125012 (2014).
  15. B.-H. Lee, S. Mamedov, S. Nam, and C. Park, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2013) 045.
  16. K. B. Fadafan and S. K. Tabatabaei, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2842 (2014).
  17. K. Bitaghsir Fadafan and S. K. Tabatabaei, Phys. Rev. D 94, 026007 (2016).
  18. K. Bitaghsir Fadafan and S. K. Tabatabaei, J. Phys. G 43, 095001 (2016).
  19. N. R. F. Braga and R. da Mata, Phys. Rev. D 101, 105016 (2020).
  20. I. Iatrakis and D. E. Kharzeev, Phys. Rev. D 93, 086009 (2016).
  21. N. R. F. Braga and L. F. Ferreira, Phys. Rev. D 94, 094019 (2016).
  22. L. Bellantuono, P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, F. Giannuzzi, and S. Nicotri, Phys. Rev. D 96, 034031 (2017).
  23. S.-Q. Feng, Y.-Q. Zhao, and X. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 101, 026023 (2020).
  24. R. Zöllner and B. Kämpfer, Particles 4, 159 (2021).
  25. Y. Guo, S. Shi, S. Feng, and J. Liao, Phys. Lett. B 798, 134929 (2019).
  26. D. She, S.-Q. Feng, Y. Zhong, and Z.-B. Yin, Eur. Phys. J. A 54, 48 (2018).
  27. Y. Zhong, C.-B. Yang, X. Cai, and S.-Q. Feng, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2014, 193039 (2014).
  28. A. Bzdak and V. Skokov, Phys. Lett. B 710, 171 (2012).
  29. W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. C 85, 044907 (2012).
  30. Z.-T. Liang and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 102301 (2005); 96, 039901(E) (2006).
  31. X.-G. Huang, P. Huovinen, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 84, 054910 (2011).
  32. F. Becattini, F. Piccinini, and J. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. C 77, 024906 (2008).
  33. Y. Jiang and J. Liao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 192302 (2016).
  34. L.-G. Pang, H. Petersen, Q. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 192301 (2016).
  35. L. P. Csernai, V. K. Magas, and D. J. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 87, 034906 (2013).
  36. W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. C 93, 064907 (2016).
  37. Y.-Q. Zhao and D. Hou, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1076 (2023).
  38. X.-L. Wang and S.-Q. Feng, Phys. Rev. D 110, 086018 (2024).
  39. J.-H. Wang and S.-Q. Feng, Phys. Rev. D 109, 066019 (2024).
  40. F. Sun and A. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 106, 076007 (2022).
  41. Y.-W. Qiu and S.-Q. Feng, Phys. Rev. D 107, 076004 (2023).
  42. Y.-W. Qiu, S.-Q. Feng, and X.-Q. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 108, 116022 (2023).
  43. Y.-R. Bao and S.-Q. Feng, Phys. Rev. D 109, 096033 (2024).
  44. X. Zhu and S.-Q. Feng, Phys. Rev. D 107, 016018 (2023).
  45. R. A. Janik and P. Witaszczyk, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2008) 026.
  46. D. Mateos and D. Trancanelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 101601 (2011).
  47. D. Mateos and D. Trancanelli, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2011) 054.
  48. A. Rebhan and D. Steineder, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2012) 020.
  49. I. Y. Aref’eva and A. A. Golubtsova, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 011.
  50. U. Gürsoy, M. Järvinen, G. Nijs, and J. F. Pedraza, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 071; 09 (2020) 059(E).
  51. M. Strickland, Pramana 84, 671 (2015).
  52. J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 222302 (2016).
  53. D. Giataganas, Proc. Sci. Corfu2012 (2013) 122.
  54. W.-B. Chang and D.-f. Hou, Phys. Rev. D 109, 086010 (2024).
  55. I. Aref’eva and K. Rannu, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 206.
  56. L. Alvarez-Gaume, C. Gomez, A. Sabio Vera, A. Tavanfar, and M. A. Vazquez-Mozo, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2009) 009.
  57. S. Lin and E. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. D 79, 124015 (2009).
  58. J. L. Albacete, Y. V. Kovchegov, and A. Taliotis, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2009) 060.
  59. I. Y. Aref’eva, A. A. Bagrov, and E. A. Guseva, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2009) 009.
  60. I. Y. Aref’eva, A. A. Bagrov, and L. V. Joukovskaya, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 002.
  61. Y. V. Kovchegov and S. Lin, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 057.
  62. Y. V. Kovchegov, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 187, 96 (2011).
  63. E. Kiritsis and A. Taliotis, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2012) 065.
  64. I. Y. Aref’eva, E. O. Pozdeeva, and T. O. Pozdeeva, Theor. Math. Phys. 176, 861 (2013).
  65. J. Zhou, X. Chen, Y.-Q. Zhao, and J. Ping, Phys. Rev. D 102, 126029 (2021).
  66. N. R. F. Braga and L. F. Ferreira, Phys. Lett. B 783, 186 (2018).
  67. H. Nadi, B. Mirza, Z. Sherkatghanad, and Z. Mirzaiyan, Nucl. Phys. B949, 114822 (2019).
  68. L. A. H. Mamani, D. Hou, and N. R. F. Braga, Phys. Rev. D 105, 126020 (2022).
  69. N. Iqbal and H. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 79, 025023 (2009).
  70. N. R. F. Braga and L. F. Ferreira, Phys. Lett. B 773, 313 (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation