Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Unraveling new physics effects in b→sℓ1ℓ2 transitions with a model-independent perspective

Aishwarya Bhatta1,*, Dhiren Panda2,†, and Rukmani Mohanta2,‡

  • *Contact author: aishwaryabhatta@niser.ac.in
  • †Contact author: pandadhiren530@gmail.com
  • ‡Contact author: rmsp@uohyd.ac.in

Phys. Rev. D 112, 075006 – Published 3 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/g2ck-lkmx

Abstract

Motivated by recent anomalies in observables associated with flavor-changing neutral current transitions, specifically b→sℓ+ℓ− processes, we present a comprehensive analysis of lepton flavor-violating (LFV) decay modes mediated by b→sℓ1ℓ2 transitions with ℓ1≠ℓ2. While such LFV processes are forbidden within the standard model, they naturally arise in several of its extensions, including models featuring additional vectorlike fermions and extra Z′ bosons. Employing the most general effective Hamiltonian for b→sℓ1ℓ2 transitions, we derive the angular distributions of the relevant decay modes. Adopting a model-independent framework, we systematically study the LFV decays B→K*ℓ1ℓ2, Bs→ϕℓ1ℓ2, B→K2*ℓ1ℓ2, and Λb→Λℓ1ℓ2. Although LFV mesonic decays have been widely explored, the corresponding baryonic decays remain comparatively underinvestigated. We provide bounds on the branching ratio (B), forward-backward asymmetry (AFB), and longitudinal lepton polarization fraction (FL). Furthermore, considering the projected sensitivities of the LHCb upgrade and Belle II experiments, we estimate upper limits for these observables, offering promising avenues for probing new physics in these LFV channels.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (102)

  1. R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays, Nat. Phys. 18, 277 (2022).
  2. R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton universality with B0→K*0ℓ+ℓ− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 055.
  3. R. Aaij et al., Measurement of CP-averaged observables in the B0→K*0μ+μ− decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 011802 (2020).
  4. R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton universality in b→sℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 051803 (2023).
  5. R. Aaij et al., Measurement of lepton universality parameters in B+→K+ℓ+ℓ− and B0→K*0ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. D 108, 032002 (2023).
  6. R. Aaij et al., Measurement of form-factor-independent observables in the decay B0→K*0μ+μ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 191801 (2013).
  7. R. Aaij et al., Angular analysis of the B0→K*0μ+μ− decay using 3  fb−1 of integrated luminosity, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 104.
  8. M. Aaboud et al., Angular analysis of Bd0→K*μ+μ− decays in pp collisions at s=8  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 047.
  9. A. M. Sirunyan et al., Measurement of angular parameters from the decay B0→K*0μ+μ− in proton-proton collisions at s=8  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 781, 517 (2018).
  10. A. Abdesselam et al., Angular analysis of B0→K*(892)0ℓ+ℓ−, in LHC Ski 2016: A First Discussion of 13 TeV Results, arXiv:1607.01212.
  11. R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays, Nat. Phys. 18 277 (2022).
  12. R. Aaij et al., Angular analysis of the B+→K*+μ+μ− decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 161802 (2021).
  13. R. Aaij et al., Measurement of CP-averaged observables in the B0→K*0μ+μ− decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 011802 (2020).
  14. R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton universality using B+→K+ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151601 (2014).
  15. R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton universality with B0→K*0ℓ+ℓ− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 055.
  16. R. Aaij et al., Search for lepton-universality violation in B+→K+ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 191801 (2019).
  17. R. Aaij et al., Angular analysis of the B0→K*0μ+μ− decay using 3  fb−1 of integrated luminosity, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 104.
  18. J. P. Lees et al., Evidence for an excess of B¯→D(*)τ−ν¯τ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 101802 (2012).
  19. J. P. Lees et al., Measurement of an excess of B¯→D(*)τ−ν¯τ decays and implications for charged Higgs bosons, Phys. Rev. D 88, 072012 (2013).
  20. R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions B(B¯0→D*+τ−ν¯τ)/B(B¯0→D*+μ−ν¯μ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 111803 (2015); 115, 159901(E) (2015).
  21. S. Hirose et al., Measurement of the τ lepton polarization and R(D*) in the decay B¯→D*τ−ν¯τ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 211801 (2017).
  22. S. Hirose et al., Measurement of the τ lepton polarization and R(D*) in the decay B¯→D*τ−ν¯τ with one-prong hadronic τ decays at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 97, 012004 (2018).
  23. R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the ratio of the B0→D*−τ+ντ and B0→D*−μ+νμ branching fractions using three-prong τ-lepton decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 171802 (2018).
  24. R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton flavor universality by the measurement of the B0→D*−τ+ντ branching fraction using three-prong τ decays, Phys. Rev. D 97, 072013 (2018).
  25. G. Caria et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of ℛ(D) and ℛ(D*) with a semileptonic tagging method, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 161803 (2020).
  26. C.-J. Lee and J. Tandean, Minimal lepton flavor violation implications of the b→s anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2015) 123.
  27. W. Altmannshofer and I. Yavin, Predictions for lepton flavor universality violation in rare B decays in models with gauged Lμ−Lτ, Phys. Rev. D 92, 075022 (2015).
  28. A. Crivellin, G. D’Ambrosio, and J. Heeck, Explaining h→μ±τ∓, B→K*μ+μ− and B→Kμ+μ−/B→Ke+e− in a two-Higgs-doublet model with gauged Lμ−Lτ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 151801 (2015).
  29. R. Alonso, B. Grinstein, and J. Martin Camalich, Lepton universality violation and lepton flavor conservation in B-meson decays, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2015) 184.
  30. D. Guadagnoli, D. Melikhov, and M. Reboud, More lepton flavor violating observables for LHCb’s Run 2, Phys. Lett. B 760, 442 (2016).
  31. R. Aaij et al., Search for the lepton-flavour-violating decays Bs0→τ±μ∓ and B0→τ±μ∓, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 211801 (2019).
  32. R. Aaij et al., Search for lepton-flavor violating decays B+→K+μ±e∓, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 241802 (2019).
  33. S. Watanuki et al., Search for the lepton flavor violating decays B+→K+τ±ℓ∓ (ℓ=e,μ) at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 261802 (2023).
  34. R. Aaij et al., Search for the lepton-flavour violating decays B0→K*0τ±μ∓, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 143.
  35. L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin, and T. Li, Model of vector leptoquarks in view of the B-physics anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 98, 115002 (2018).
  36. R. Barbieri and A. Tesi, B-decay anomalies in Pati-Salam SU(4), Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 193 (2018).
  37. M. Blanke and A. Crivellin, B meson anomalies in a Pati-Salam model within the Randall-Sundrum background, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 011801 (2018).
  38. L. Di Luzio, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Greljo, M. Nardecchia, and S. Renner, Maximal flavour violation: A Cabibbo mechanism for leptoquarks, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 081.
  39. T. Faber, M. Hudec, M. Malinský, P. Meinzinger, W. Porod, and F. Staub, A unified leptoquark model confronted with lepton non-universality in B-meson decays, Phys. Lett. B 787, 159 (2018).
  40. J. Heeck and D. Teresi, Pati-Salam explanations of the B-meson anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2018) 103.
  41. A. Angelescu, D. Bečirević, D. A. Faroughy, and O. Sumensari, Closing the window on single leptoquark solutions to the B-physics anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 183.
  42. M. Schmaltz and Y.-M. Zhong, The leptoquark Hunter’s guide: Large coupling, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 132.
  43. A. Greljo, J. Martin Camalich, and J. D. Ruiz-Álvarez, Mono-τ signatures at the LHC constrain explanations of B-decay anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 131803 (2019).
  44. B. Fornal, S. A. Gadam, and B. Grinstein, Left-right SU(4) vector leptoquark model for flavor anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 99, 055025 (2019).
  45. M. J. Baker, J. Fuentes-Martín, G. Isidori, and M. König, High-pT signatures in vector–leptoquark models, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 334 (2019).
  46. C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martin, and G. Isidori, Revisiting the vector leptoquark explanation of the B-physics anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2019) 168.
  47. L. Da Rold and F. Lamagna, A vector leptoquark for the B-physics anomalies from a composite GUT, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 112.
  48. M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martin, and G. Isidori, A three-site gauge model for flavor hierarchies and flavor anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 779, 317 (2018).
  49. M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martín, and G. Isidori, Low-energy signatures of the PS3 model: From B-physics anomalies to LFV, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 148.
  50. M. Bordone, O. Catà, and T. Feldmann, Effective theory approach to new physics with flavour: General framework and a leptoquark example, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 067.
  51. D. Marzocca, Addressing the B-physics anomalies in a fundamental Composite Higgs Model, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 121.
  52. D. Bečirević, I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, N. Košnik, D. A. Faroughy, and O. Sumensari, Scalar leptoquarks from grand unified theories to accommodate the B-physics anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 98, 055003 (2018).
  53. I. Bigaran, J. Gargalionis, and R. R. Volkas, A near-minimal leptoquark model for reconciling flavour anomalies and generating radiative neutrino masses, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 106.
  54. A. Crivellin, D. Müller, and F. Saturnino, Flavor phenomenology of the leptoquark singlet-triplet model, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 020.
  55. S. Saad, Combined explanations of (g−2)μ, RD(*), RK(*) anomalies in a two-loop radiative neutrino mass model, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015019 (2020).
  56. V. Gherardi, D. Marzocca, and E. Venturini, Low-energy phenomenology of scalar leptoquarks at one-loop accuracy, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 138.
  57. K. S. Babu, P. S. B. Dev, S. Jana, and A. Thapa, Unified framework for B-anomalies, muon g−2 and neutrino masses, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 179.
  58. A. Crivellin, D. Müller, and T. Ota, Simultaneous explanation of R(D(*)) and b→sμ+μ−: The last scalar leptoquarks standing, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2017) 040.
  59. D. Buttazzo, A. Greljo, G. Isidori, and D. Marzocca, B-physics anomalies: A guide to combined explanations, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 044.
  60. M. Bordone, O. Catà, T. Feldmann, and R. Mandal, Constraining flavour patterns of scalar leptoquarks in the effective field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 122.
  61. C. Cornella, D. A. Faroughy, J. Fuentes-Martin, G. Isidori, and M. Neubert, Reading the footprints of the B-meson flavor anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 050.
  62. D. Marzocca and S. Trifinopoulos, Minimal explanation of flavor anomalies: B-meson decays, muon magnetic moment, and the Cabibbo angle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 061803 (2021).
  63. A. Greljo, P. Stangl, and A. E. Thomsen, A model of muon anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136554 (2021).
  64. J. Davighi, Anomalous Z’ bosons for anomalous B decays, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 101.
  65. J. S. Alvarado, S. F. Mantilla, R. Martinez, F. Ochoa, and C. Sierra, Gauged nonuniversal U(1)X model to study muon g-2 and B meson anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095040 (2023).
  66. T. Blake, S. Meinel, and D. van Dyk, Bayesian analysis of b→sμ+μ− Wilson coefficients using the full angular distribution of Λb→Λ(→pπ−)μ+μ− decays, Phys. Rev. D 101, 035023 (2020).
  67. R. Aaij et al., Physics case for an LHCb upgrade II—Opportunities in flavour physics, and beyond, in the HL-LHC era, Report No. LHCB-PUB-2018-009, CERN-LHCC-2018-027 (2018), arXiv:1808.08865.
  68. M. Algueró, B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, and M. Novoa-Brunet, b→sℓℓ global fits after Moriond 2021 results, in 55th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories (2021).
  69. W. Altmannshofer and P. Stangl, New physics in rare B decays after Moriond 2021, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 952 (2021).
  70. T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi, D. M. Santos, and S. Neshatpour, More indications for lepton nonuniversality in b→sℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Lett. B 824, 136838 (2022).
  71. M. Ciuchini, A. M. Coutinho, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, New physics in b→sℓ+ℓ− confronts new data on lepton universality, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 719 (2019).
  72. R. Mohanta, Effect of FCNC mediated Z boson on lepton flavor violating decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1625 (2011).
  73. P. Nayek, S. Biswas, P. Maji, S. Sahoo, and S. Sahoo, Implication of Z-mediated FCNC on semileptonic decays Bs→ϕℓ+ℓ− and B+→K+ℓ+ℓ−, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 59, 1418 (2020).
  74. A. Crivellin, L. Hofer, J. Matias, U. Nierste, S. Pokorski, and J. Rosiek, Lepton-flavour violating B decays in generic Z′ models, Phys. Rev. D 92, 054013 (2015).
  75. Y. Farzan and I. M. Shoemaker, Lepton flavor violating non-standard interactions via light mediators, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2016) 033.
  76. D. Das, Lepton flavor violating Λb→Λℓ1ℓ2 decay, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 1005 (2019).
  77. A. Crivellin, Z. Fabisiewicz, W. Materkowska, U. Nierste, S. Pokorski, and J. Rosiek, Lepton flavour violation in the MSSM: Exact diagonalization vs mass expansion, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 003.
  78. A. Dedes, J. Rosiek, and P. Tanedo, Complete one-loop MSSM predictions for B0→ℓ+ℓ′ at the Tevatron and LHC, Phys. Rev. D 79, 055006 (2009).
  79. B. M. Dassinger, T. Feldmann, T. Mannel, and S. Turczyk, Model-independent analysis of lepton flavour violating tau decays, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2007) 039.
  80. S. L. Glashow, D. Guadagnoli, and K. Lane, Lepton flavor violation in B decays?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 091801 (2015).
  81. D. Bečirević, O. Sumensari, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Lepton flavor violation in exclusive b→s decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 134 (2016).
  82. D. Guadagnoli and K. Lane, Charged-lepton mixing and lepton flavor violation, Phys. Lett. B 751, 54 (2015).
  83. D. Bečirević, N. Košnik, O. Sumensari, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Palatable leptoquark scenarios for lepton flavor violation in exclusive b→sℓ1ℓ2 modes, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 035.
  84. J. Gratrex, M. Hopfer, and R. Zwicky, Generalised helicity formalism, higher moments and the B→KJK(→Kπ)ℓ¯1ℓ2 angular distributions, Phys. Rev. D 93, 054008 (2016).
  85. P. Zyla et al., Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  86. http://www.utfit.org/UTfit/WebHome
  87. R. Balasubramamian and B. Blossier, Decay constant of Bs and Bs* mesons from Nf=2 lattice QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 412 (2020).
  88. C. Bouchard, G. P. Lepage, C. Monahan, H. Na, and J. Shigemitsu, Rare decay B→Kℓ+ℓ− form factors from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 88, 054509 (2013); 88, 079901(E) (2013).
  89. N. Gubernari, A. Kokulu, and D. van Dyk, B→P and B→V form factors from B-meson light-cone sum rules beyond leading twist, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 150.
  90. R. Aaij et al., Search for the lepton flavour violating decay B+→K+μ−τ+ using Bs2*0 decays, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 129.
  91. J. P. Lees et al., A search for the decay modes B+−→h+−τ+−l, Phys. Rev. D 86, 012004 (2012).
  92. R. Aaij et al., Search for the lepton-flavour-violating decays Bs0→τ±μ∓ and B0→τ±μ∓, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 211801 (2019).
  93. D. Lancierini, G. Isidori, P. Owen, and N. Serra, On the significance of new physics in b→sℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Lett. B 822, 136644 (2021).
  94. W. Altmannshofer, P. Ball, A. Bharucha, A. J. Buras, D. M. Straub, and M. Wick, Symmetries and asymmetries of B→K*μ+μ− decays in the standard model and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 019.
  95. A. Bharucha, D. M. Straub, and R. Zwicky, B→Vℓ+ℓ− in the standard model from light-cone sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 098.
  96. P. Ball and R. Zwicky, Bd,s→ρ,ω,K*,ϕ decay form-factors from light-cone sum rules revisited, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014029 (2005).
  97. W. Wang, B to tensor meson form factors in the perturbative QCD approach, Phys. Rev. D 83, 014008 (2011).
  98. T. M. Aliev, H. Dag, A. Kokulu, and A. Ozpineci, B→T transition form factors in light-cone sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 100, 094005 (2019).
  99. Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the B→K2*(1430),a2(1320),f2(1270) form-factors with light-cone QCD sum rules, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26, 2761 (2011).
  100. D. Das, Model independent new physics analysis in Λb→Λμ+μ− decay, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 230 (2018).
  101. D. Das, On the angular distribution of Λb→Λ(→Nπ)τ+τ− decay, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 063.
  102. E. R. Berger, A. Donnachie, H. G. Dosch, and O. Nachtmann, Observing the odderon: Tensor meson photoproduction, Eur. Phys. J. C 14, 673 (2000).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation