Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Nature of the Pc states from compositeness criteria

Yu-Fei Wang1, Chao-Wei Shen2, Deborah Rönchen3, Ulf-G. Meißner4,3,5, Bing-Song Zou6,7, and Fei Huang1,*

  • *Contact author: huangfei@ucas.ac.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 074010 – Published 10 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fvjn-8bl9

Abstract

Based on a coupled-channel approach, we investigate the structures of four Pc states through compositeness criteria. Toward a more precise description of the states, we have obtained refined fit results of the LHCb data on the J/ψp invariant mass distribution of the Λb0→J/ψpK− decay. Allowing for the fact that each of the four Pc states couples strongly to a nearby S-wave channel, three criteria on the compositeness/elementariness are adopted in this study: the pole-counting rule, the spectral density function, and the Gamow wave function. Compositeness information is extracted from the scattering amplitudes and the pole parameters (pole positions and residues), without any preconceived assumptions on the nature of the Pc states and without any dependence on the model parametrization. Consistently within the framework of all the three methods, it has been found that the Pc(4312)1/2− is mainly composed by D¯Σc, Pc(4380)3/2− by D¯Σc*, while the Pc(4440)1/2− and Pc(4457)3/2− states both turn out as composite states of D¯*Σc. The upper limits of the values of their elementariness are estimated to be rather small. This paper provides an additional confirmation of the molecular interpretation for the Pc states in the literature.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (92)

  1. S.-K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003).
  2. F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018); 94, 029901(E) (2022).
  3. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015).
  4. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222001 (2019).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 062001 (2022).
  6. D. Johnson, I. Polyakov, T. Skwarnicki, and M. Wang, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 74, 583 (2024).
  7. J.-J. Wu, R. Molina, E. Oset, and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 232001 (2010).
  8. J.-J. Wu, R. Molina, E. Oset, and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. C 84, 015202 (2011).
  9. W. L. Wang, F. Huang, Z. Y. Zhang, and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. C 84, 015203 (2011).
  10. J.-J. Wu, T. S. H. Lee, and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. C 85, 044002 (2012).
  11. T. J. Burns, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 152 (2015).
  12. R. Chen, X. Liu, X.-Q. Li, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 132002 (2015).
  13. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 172001 (2015).
  14. J. He, Phys. Lett. B 753, 547 (2016).
  15. U.-G. Meißner and J. A. Oller, Phys. Lett. B 751, 59 (2015).
  16. R. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Nucl. Phys. A954, 406 (2016).
  17. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 639, 1 (2016).
  18. Q.-F. Lü and Y.-B. Dong, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074020 (2016).
  19. P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, Phys. Lett. B 764, 207 (2017).
  20. L. Roca and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 591 (2016).
  21. C.-W. Shen, F.-K. Guo, J.-J. Xie, and B.-S. Zou, Nucl. Phys. A954, 393 (2016).
  22. Y.-H. Lin, C.-W. Shen, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114017 (2017).
  23. M.-L. Du, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, J. A. Oller, and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 072001 (2020).
  24. Z.-H. Guo and J. A. Oller, Phys. Lett. B 793, 144 (2019).
  25. M.-Z. Liu, Ya-Wen Pan, F.-Z. Peng, M. S. Sánchez, L.-S. Geng, A. Hosaka, and M. P. Valderrama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 242001 (2019).
  26. M.-Z. Liu, T.-W. Wu, M. S. Sánchez, M. P. Valderrama, L.-S. Geng, and J.-J. Xie, Phys. Rev. D 103, 054004 (2021).
  27. L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014031 (2019).
  28. C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014021 (2019).
  29. C. W. Xiao, J. X. Lu, J. J. Wu, and L. S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 102, 056018 (2020).
  30. D.-L. Yao, L.-Y. Dai, H.-Q. Zheng, and Z.-Y. Zhou, Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 076201 (2021).
  31. M.-L. Du, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, J. A. Oller, and Q. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 157.
  32. X.-W. Wang, Z.-G. Wang, G.-L. Yu, and Q. Xin, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 291011 (2022).
  33. Q. Li et al., arXiv:2503.08440.
  34. S.-Q. Kuang, L.-Y. Dai, X.-W. Kang, and D.-L. Yao, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 433 (2020).
  35. S. X. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D 103, L111503 (2021).
  36. T. J. Burns and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054029 (2022).
  37. A. Ali and A. Y. Parkhomenko, Phys. Lett. B 793, 365 (2019).
  38. M. I. Eides, V. Y. Petrov, and M. V. Polyakov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35, 2050151 (2020).
  39. A. Pimikov, H.-J. Lee, and P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014002 (2020).
  40. Z.-G. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2050003 (2020).
  41. X.-Z. Weng, X.-L. Chen, W.-Z. Deng, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 100, 016014 (2019).
  42. R. Zhu, X. Liu, H. Huang, and C.-F. Qiao, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134869 (2019).
  43. J. F. Giron and R. F. Lebed, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114028 (2021).
  44. W. Ruangyoo, K. Phumphan, C.-C. Chen, A. Limphirat, and Y. Yan, J. Phys. G 49, 075001 (2022).
  45. L. M. Santos, V. A. A. Chavez, and D. L. B. Sombillo, J. Phys. G 52, 015104 (2025).
  46. Y.-F. Wang, U.-G. Meißner, D. Rönchen, and C.-W. Shen, Phys. Rev. C 109, 015202 (2024).
  47. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 137, B672 (1965).
  48. U. van Kolck, Symmetry 14, 1884 (2022).
  49. D. Morgan, Nucl. Phys. A543, 632 (1992).
  50. O. Zhang, C. Meng, and H. Q. Zheng, Phys. Lett. B 680, 453 (2009).
  51. L. Y. Dai, M. Shi, G.-Y. Tang, and H. Q. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D 92, 014020 (2015).
  52. C. Meng, J. J. Sanz-Cillero, M. Shi, D.-L. Yao, and H.-Q. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034020 (2015).
  53. Q.-R. Gong, Z.-H. Guo, C. Meng, G.-Y. Tang, Y.-F. Wang, and H.-Q. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D 94, 114019 (2016).
  54. Q.-F. Cao, H.-R. Qi, Y.-F. Wang, and H.-Q. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D 100, 054040 (2019).
  55. Q.-F. Cao, H. Chen, H.-R. Qi, and H.-Q. Zheng, Chin. Phys. C 45, 103102 (2021).
  56. H. Chen, H.-R. Qi, and H.-Q. Zheng, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 812 (2021).
  57. V. Baru, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, Y. Kalashnikova, and A. E. Kudryavtsev, Phys. Lett. B 586, 53 (2004).
  58. Y. S. Kalashnikova, Phys. Rev. D 72, 034010 (2005).
  59. Y. S. Kalashnikova and A. V. Nefediev, Phys. Rev. D 80, 074004 (2009).
  60. V. Baru, C. Hanhart, Y. S. Kalashnikova, A. E. Kudryavtsev, and A. V. Nefediev, Eur. Phys. J. A 44, 93 (2010).
  61. C. Hanhart, Y. S. Kalashnikova, and A. V. Nefediev, Phys. Rev. D 81, 094028 (2010).
  62. C. Hanhart, Y. S. Kalashnikova, and A. V. Nefediev, Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 101 (2011).
  63. G. Gamow, Z. Phys. 51, 204 (1928).
  64. O. Civitarese and M. Gadella, Phys. Rep. 396, 41 (2004).
  65. W. J. Romo, Nucl. Phys. A116, 617 (1968).
  66. Z. Xiao and Z.-Y. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 94, 076006 (2016).
  67. Z. Xiao and Z.-Y. Zhou, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 58, 062110 (2017).
  68. Z. Xiao and Z.-Y. Zhou, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 58, 072102 (2017).
  69. T. Sekihara, Phys. Rev. C 95, 025206 (2017).
  70. F. Aceti and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 86, 014012 (2012).
  71. T. Hyodo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 132002 (2013).
  72. Z.-H. Guo and J. A. Oller, Phys. Rev. D 93, 096001 (2016).
  73. T. Sekihara, T. Arai, J. Yamagata-Sekihara, and S. Yasui, Phys. Rev. C 93, 035204 (2016).
  74. J. A. Oller, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 396, 429 (2018).
  75. T. Sekihara, Phys. Rev. C 104, 035202 (2021).
  76. I. Matuschek, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, and C. Hanhart, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 101 (2021).
  77. T. Kinugawa and T. Hyodo, Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 154 (2025).
  78. J.-X. Lin, J. Song, M. Albaladejo, A. Feijoo, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014044 (2025).
  79. C.-W. Shen, D. Rönchen, U.-G. Meißner, B.-S. Zou, and Y.-F. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 764 (2024).
  80. M. Döring, J. Haidenbauer, M. Mai, and T. Sato, arXiv:2505.02745.
  81. D. Rönchen, M. Döring, U.-G. Meißner, and C.-W. Shen, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 229 (2022).
  82. Y.-F. Wang, D. Rönchen, U.-G. Meißner, Y. Lu, C.-W. Shen, and J.-J. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 106, 094031 (2022).
  83. M. Mai, J. Hergenrather, M. Döring, T. Mart, U.-G. Meißner, D. Rönchen, and R. Workman (Jülich—Bonn—Washington), Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 286 (2023).
  84. Y.-F. Wang, M. Döring, J. Hergenrather, M. Mai, T. Mart, U.-G. Meißner, D. Rönchen, and R. Workman (Jülich—Bonn—Washington), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 101901 (2024).
  85. Z.-L. Wang, C.-W. Shen, D. Rönchen, U.-G. Meißner, and B.-S. Zou, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 497 (2022).
  86. L. Castillejo, R. H. Dalitz, and F. J. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 101, 453 (1956).
  87. S. S. Schweber, An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory, Etc (John Weatherhill, New York, Tokyo, 1964).
  88. M. Döring, C. Hanhart, F. Huang, S. Krewald, and U.-G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. A829, 170 (2009).
  89. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  90. X. Zhang, arXiv:2410.10154.
  91. P. Thörnig, J. Large-Scale Res. Facil. 7, A182 (2021).
  92. J. R. Taylor, Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1972).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation