Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Spin correlations in dark photon searches

Jonathan L. Feng*, Miša Toman†, and Eli Welch‡

  • *Contact author: jlf@uci.edu
  • †Contact author: mtoman@uci.edu
  • ‡Contact author: welchem@uci.edu

Phys. Rev. D 114, 016029 – Published 27 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fvfp-ct3r

Abstract

We investigate the spin correlations between production and decay in the process where dark photons A′ are produced in pseudoscalar meson decays, for example, π0,η→γA′, and then decay to fermion pairs, A′→ff¯. This process is the focus of many experimental searches, but spin correlations are typically ignored. We derive analytic results that allow us to quickly scan parameter space and quantify the error made in neglecting spin correlations. In particular, we define a discrepancy parameter and find that this parameter is always less than 163≈9.6%, which provides a rough measure of the size of spin correlation effects. However, these effects may be enhanced or suppressed by cuts in realistic experimental analyses, and so we also consider two representative examples, including current FASER analyses and possible future searches at SHiP. We find that the effects of spin correlations are negligible for existing FASER analyses, but can significantly reduce event rates at upcoming SHiP searches.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (30)

  1. B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon charge shifts, Phys. Lett. 166B, 196 (1986).
  2. C. Boehm and P. Fayet, Scalar dark matter candidates, Nucl. Phys. B683, 219 (2004).
  3. M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, Secluded WIMP dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 662, 53 (2008).
  4. J. L. Feng and J. Kumar, The WIMPless miracle: Dark-matter particles without weak-scale masses or weak interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 231301 (2008).
  5. D. Banerjee et al. (NA64 Collaboration), Improved limits on a hypothetical X(16.7) boson and a dark photon decaying into e+e− pairs, Phys. Rev. D 101, 071101 (2020).
  6. P. H. Adrian et al., Searching for prompt and long-lived dark photons in electroproduced e+e− pairs with the heavy photon search experiment at JLab, Phys. Rev. D 108, 012015 (2023).
  7. H. Abreu et al. (FASER Collaboration), Search for dark photons with the FASER detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 848, 138378 (2024).
  8. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), Search for leptonic decays of dark photons at NA62, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 111802 (2024).
  9. F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, Forward experiment sensitivity estimator for the LHC and future hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 104, 035012 (2021).
  10. Y. Kahn, G. Krnjaic, J. Thaler, and M. Toups, DAEδALUS and dark matter detection, Phys. Rev. D 91, 055006 (2015).
  11. T. Han, I. Lewis, R. Ruiz, and Z.-g. Si, Lepton number violation and W′ chiral couplings at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 87, 035011 (2013); 87, 039906(E) (2013).
  12. H. Abreu et al. (FASER Collaboration), The FASER detector, J. Instrum. 19, P05066 (2024).
  13. R. Albanese et al. (SHiP Collaboration), BDF/SHiP at the ECN3 high-intensity beam facility, Technical Report, CERN, Geneva, 2023, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2878604.
  14. D. Feldman, Z. Liu, and P. Nath, The Stueckelberg Z′ extension with kinetic mixing and Milli-Charged dark matter from the hidden sector, Phys. Rev. D 75, 115001 (2007).
  15. H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, “Dark” Z implications for parity violation, rare meson decays, and Higgs physics, Phys. Rev. D 85, 115019 (2012).
  16. J. L. Feng, J. Smolinsky, and P. Tanedo, Detecting dark matter through dark photons from the Sun: Charged particle signatures, Phys. Rev. D 93, 115036 (2016); 96, 099903(E) (2017).
  17. S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 2: Modern Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2013).
  18. B. Batell, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Exploring portals to a hidden sector through fixed targets, Phys. Rev. D 80, 095024 (2009).
  19. D. Berdine, N. Kauer, and D. Rainwater, Breakdown of the narrow width approximation for new physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 111601 (2007).
  20. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995).
  21. J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling, and S. Trojanowski, ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 97, 035001 (2018).
  22. A. Ariga et al. (FASER Collaboration), Technical proposal for FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC, arXiv:1812.09139.
  23. J. Boyd and J. L. Feng, Request to run FASER in Run 4, Technical Report, CERN, Geneva, 2023, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2882503.
  24. F. Kling, E. Welch, J. L. Feng et al. (FASER Collaboration), Dark photon signal validation and systematic uncertainties for LHC Run 3 in 2022, CERN-FASER-NOTE-2022-011, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2845232/files/Internal.
  25. T. Pierog, I. Karpenko, J. M. Katzy, E. Yatsenko, and K. Werner, EPOS LHC: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C 92, 034906 (2015).
  26. R. Mammen Abraham et al. (FASER Collaboration), Neutrino rate predictions for FASER, Phys. Rev. D 110, 012009 (2024).
  27. R. Mammen Abraham et al. (FASER Collaboration), Shining light on the dark sector: Search for axion-like particles and other new physics in photonic final states with FASER, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 199.
  28. J. L. Feng et al., The forward physics facility at the high-luminosity LHC, J. Phys. G 50, 030501 (2023).
  29. C. Ahdida et al. (SHiP Collaboration), Sensitivity of the SHiP experiment to light dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 199.
  30. SHiP Collaboration, Fairship, https://github.com/ShipSoft/FairShip.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation