- Open Access
Test of lepton flavor universality with measurements of and using semileptonic tagging at the Belle II experiment
Phys. Rev. D 112, 032010 – Published 26 August, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fmn3-h8fy
Abstract
We report measurements of the ratios of branching fractions , where denotes either an electron or a muon. These ratios test the universality of the charged-current weak interaction. The results are based on a data sample collected with the Belle II detector at the SuperKEKB collider, which operates at a center-of-mass energy corresponding to the resonance, just above the threshold for production. Signal candidates are reconstructed by selecting events in which the companion meson from the decay is identified in semileptonic modes. The lepton is reconstructed via its leptonic decays. We obtain and , which are consistent with world average values. Accounting for the correlation between them, these values differ from the Standard Model expectation by a collective significance of 1.7 standard deviations.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (57)
- F. U. Bernlochner, M. F. Sevilla, D. J. Robinson, and G. Wormser, Semitauonic -hadron decays: A lepton flavor universality laboratory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 015003 (2022).
- D. Bigi and P. Gambino, Revisiting , Phys. Rev. D 94, 094008 (2016).
- P. Gambino, M. Jung, and S. Schacht, The puzzle: An update, Phys. Lett. B 795, 386 (2019).
- M. Bordone, M. Jung, and D. van Dyk, Theory determination of form factors at ,Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 74 (2020).
- G. Martinelli, S. Simula, and L. Vittorio, | and using lattice QCD and unitarity, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034503 (2022).
- F. U. Bernlochner, Z. Ligeti, M. Papucci, M. T. Prim, D. J. Robinson, and C. Xiong, Constrained second-order power corrections in HQET: , and new physics, Phys. Rev. D 106, 096015 (2022).
- I. Ray and S. Nandi, Test of new physics effects in decays with heavy and light leptons, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 022.
- Y. Aoki, T. Blum, G. Colangelo et al., FLAG review 2021, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 869 (2022).
- J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Extraction of form factors from a four-dimensional angular analysis of , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 091801 (2019).
- G. Martinelli, S. Simula, and L. Vittorio, Updates on the determination of , and , Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 400 (2024).
- J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Evidence for an excess of decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 101802 (2012).
- J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Measurement of an excess of decays and implications for charged Higgs bosons, Phys. Rev. D 88, 072012 (2013).
- M. Huschle et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the branching ratio of relative to decays with hadronic tagging at Belle,Phys. Rev. D 92, 072014 (2015).
- Y. Sato et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the branching ratio of relative to decays with a semileptonic tagging method, Phys. Rev. D 94, 072007 (2016).
- S. Hirose et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the lepton polarization and in the decay , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 211801 (2017).
- S. Hirose et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the lepton polarization and in the decay with one-prong hadronic decays at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 97, 012004 (2018).
- G. Caria et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of and ) with a semileptonic tagging method, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 161803 (2020).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 121801 (2018).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of the decay , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 191803 (2022).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the ratios of branching fractions and , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 111802 (2023).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton flavor universality using decays with hadronic channels, Phys. Rev. D 108, 012018 (2023).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Evidence for decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 021802 (2025).
- I. Adachi et al. (Belle II Collaboration), Test of lepton flavor universality with a measurement of using hadronic tagging at the Belle II experiment, Phys. Rev. D 110, 072020 (2024).
- I. Adachi et al. (Belle II Collaboration), First measurement of as an inclusive test of the anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 211804 (2024).
- S. Banerjee et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV) Collaboration), Averages of -hadron, -hadron, and -lepton properties as of 2023, arXiv:2411.18639.
- T. Keck et al., The full event interpretation, Comput. Software Big Sci. 3, 6 (2019).
- K. Akai, K. Furukawa, and H. Koiso (SuperKEKB Collaboration), SuperKEKB collider, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 907, 188 (2018).
- T. Abe et al. (Belle II Collaboration), Belle II Technical Design Report, arXiv:1011.0352.
- A. Abashian et al., The Belle detector, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 479, 117 (2002), also see detector section in J Brodzicka et al., Physics achievements from the Belle experiment, arXiv:1212.5342.
- D. J. Lange, The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 462, 152 (2001).
- S. Jadach, B. F. L. Ward, and Z. Was, The precision Monte Carlo event generator KK for two-fermion final states in collisions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 130, 260 (2000).
- T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
- E. Barberio, B. van Eijk, and Z. Wąs, Photos — a universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections in decays, Comput. Phys. Commun. 66, 115 (1991).
- S. Agostinelli et al. (GEANT4 Collaboration), Geant4—a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
- R. Glattauer et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the decay ℓ in fully reconstructed events and determination of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element , Phys. Rev. D 93, 032006 (2016).
- E. Waheed et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the CKM matrix element from at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 100, 052007 (2019); 103, 079901(E) (2021).
- F. U. Bernlochner, S. Duell, Z. Ligeti, M. Papucci, and D. J. Robinson, Das ist der HAMMER: Consistent new physics interpretations of semileptonic decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 883 (2020).
- Y. S. Amhis et al. (HFLAV Collaboration), Averages of -hadron, -hadron, and -lepton properties as of 2021, Phys. Rev. D 107, 052008 (2023).
- F. U. Bernlochner and Z. Ligeti, Semileptonic decays to excited charmed mesons with and searching for new physics with , Phys. Rev. D 95, 014022 (2017).
- F. U. Bernlochner, Z. Ligeti, and D. J. Robinson, Model-independent analysis of semileptonic decays to for arbitrary new physics, Phys. Rev. D 97, 075011 (2018).
- S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
- T. Kuhr, C. Pulvermacher, M. Ritter, T. Hauth, and N. Braun (Belle II Framework Software Group), The Belle II core software, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 3, 1 (2019).
- T. Keck, Machine learning algorithms for the Belle II experiment and their validation on Belle data, Ph.D. thesis, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), 2017, https://publish.etp.kit.edu/record/21404.
- G. C. Fox and S. Wolfram, Observables for the analysis of event shapes in annihilation and other processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1581 (1978).
- P. Cheema, Suppressing beam background and fake photons at Belle II using machine learning, EPJ Web Conf. 295, 09035 (2024).
- T. Keck, FastBDT: A speed-optimized multivariate classification algorithm for the Belle II experiment, Comput. Software Big Sci. 1, 2 (2017).
- F. Pedregosa et al., Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825 (2011), http://jmlr.org/papers/v12/pedregosa11a.html.
- L. Heinrich, M. Feickert, G. Stark, and K. Cranmer, pyhf: Pure-Python implementation of HistFactory statistical models, J. Open Source Softwaare 6, 2823 (2021).
- K. Cranmer, G. Lewis, L. Moneta, A. Shibata, and W. Verkerke (ROOT Collaboration), HistFactory: A tool for creating statistical models for use with RooFit and RooStats, CERN Open Technical Report No. CERN-OPEN-2012-016, 2012, 10.17181/CERN-OPEN-2012-016.
- H. Dembinski et al., scikit-hep/iminuit, Zenodo (2020), 10.5281/zenodo.3949207; F. James and M. Roos, Minuit - a system for function minimization and analysis of the parameter errors and correlations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 10, 343 (1975).
- R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
- C. G. Boyd, B. Grinstein, and R. F. Lebed, Model-independent determinations of form factors, Nucl. Phys. B461, 493 (1996).
- C. G. Boyd, B. Grinstein, and R. F. Lebed, Precision corrections to dispersive bounds on form factors, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6895 (1997).
- I. Caprini, L. Lellouch, and M. Neubert, Dispersive bounds on the shape of form factors, Nucl. Phys. B530, 153 (1998).
- S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and I. Nisandzic, sensitivity to new physics, Phys. Rev. D 85, 094025 (2012).
- M. Tanaka and R. Watanabe, Tau longitudinal polarization in and its role in the search for the charged Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034027 (2010).
- S. Baker and R. D. Cousins, Clarification of the use of CHI-square and likelihood functions in fits to histograms, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 221, 437 (1984).