Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Energy-momentum tensor form factors and spin density distribution in the nucleon calculated in a quantized Skyrme model with vector mesons

Kenji Fukushima* and Tomoya Uji†

  • *Contact author: fuku@nt.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
  • †Contact author: uji@nt.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 113, 114049 – Published 29 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fgxk-81p3

Abstract

We investigate energy-momentum tensor (EMT) form factors and the spatial spin density distribution in the nucleon within a framework of the quantized Skyrme model with vector mesons. We construct both the canonical and Belinfante improved EMTs and analyze how pseudogauge uncertainty influences local spin and momentum densities while leaving the global nucleon properties unchanged. Using the inversion formulas from nucleon matrix elements in the forward limit, we extract the form factors, A(t), D(t), and J(t), in both pseudogauges and the additional antisymmetric form factor, G(t), associated with the canonical EMT. We find that the pseudogauge choice leads to sizable differences in the local spin and momentum densities. In particular, the canonical EMT naturally encodes spin density through the antisymmetric tensor structure, while the Belinfante EMT is sensitive to the total angular momentum only. Our results illustrate explicitly how different pseudogauges correspond to different spatial interpretations of nucleon spin structure within the same underlying dynamics. These findings provide a concrete model realization of the pseudogauge ambiguity in QCD-inspired nucleon structure and offer useful intuition for interpreting spatial distributions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (98)

  1. A. Accardi et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 268 (2016).
  2. R. Abdul Khalek et al., Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022).
  3. X.-D. Ji, Phys. Rev. D 55, 7114 (1997).
  4. D. Müller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, F. M. Dittes, and J. Hořejši, Fortschr. Phys. 42, 101 (1994).
  5. A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. B 385, 333 (1996).
  6. A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Rev. D 56, 5524 (1997).
  7. M. Diehl, Eur. Phys. J. C 25, 223 (2002); 31, 277(E) (2003).
  8. M. Burkardt, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 173 (2003).
  9. M. Burkardt, Phys. Rev. D 72, 094020 (2005).
  10. K. Goeke, M. V. Polyakov, and M. Vanderhaeghen, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 47, 401 (2001).
  11. M. Diehl, Phys. Rep. 388, 41 (2003).
  12. A. V. Belitsky and A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Rep. 418, 1 (2005).
  13. M. V. Polyakov and P. Schweitzer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1830025 (2018).
  14. X.-D. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 610 (1997).
  15. M. V. Polyakov and C. Weiss, Phys. Rev. D 60, 114017 (1999).
  16. M. V. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 555, 57 (2003).
  17. C. Lorcé, H. Moutarde, and A. P. Trawiński, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 89 (2019).
  18. X.-D. Ji, W. Melnitchouk, and X. Song, Phys. Rev. D 56, 5511 (1997).
  19. P. Schweitzer, S. Boffi, and M. Radici, Phys. Rev. D 66, 114004 (2002).
  20. C. Cebulla, K. Goeke, J. Ossmann, and P. Schweitzer, Nucl. Phys. A794, 87 (2007).
  21. K. Goeke, J. Grabis, J. Ossmann, M. V. Polyakov, P. Schweitzer, A. Silva, and D. Urbano, Phys. Rev. D 75, 094021 (2007).
  22. K. Goeke, J. Grabis, J. Ossmann, P. Schweitzer, A. Silva, and D. Urbano, Phys. Rev. C 75, 055207 (2007).
  23. M. Wakamatsu, Phys. Lett. B 648, 181 (2007).
  24. H.-C. Kim, P. Schweitzer, and U. Yakhshiev, Phys. Lett. B 718, 625 (2012).
  25. J.-H. Jung, U. Yakhshiev, and H.-C. Kim, J. Phys. G 41, 055107 (2014).
  26. J. Hudson and P. Schweitzer, Phys. Rev. D 97, 056003 (2018).
  27. M. J. Neubelt, A. Sampino, J. Hudson, K. Tezgin, and P. Schweitzer, Phys. Rev. D 101, 034013 (2020).
  28. D. Chakrabarti, C. Mondal, A. Mukherjee, S. Nair, and X. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 102, 113011 (2020).
  29. M. Fujita, Y. Hatta, S. Sugimoto, and T. Ueda, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 093B06 (2022).
  30. A. Garcia Martin-Caro, M. Huidobro, and Y. Hatta, Phys. Rev. D 108, 034014 (2023).
  31. A. García Martín-Caro, M. Huidobro, and Y. Hatta, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034002 (2024).
  32. M. Goharipour, H. Hashamipour, H. Fatehi, F. Irani, K. Azizi, and S. V. Goloskokov (MMGPDs Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 014016 (2025).
  33. S. Sugimoto and T. Tsukamoto, arXiv:2503.19492.
  34. M. Tanaka, D. Fujii, and M. Kawaguchi, Phys. Rev. D 112, 054048 (2025).
  35. R. Stegeman and R. Zwicky, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2026) 184.
  36. R. Stegeman and R. Zwicky, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2026) 159.
  37. J. Deng and D. Hou, arXiv:2512.17554.
  38. J. Deng and D. Hou, arXiv:2603.04794.
  39. W. Broniowski and E. Ruiz Arriola, Phys. Rev. D 112, 054028 (2025).
  40. P. E. Shanahan and W. Detmold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 072003 (2019).
  41. D. C. Hackett, D. A. Pefkou, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 251904 (2024).
  42. V. D. Burkert, L. Elouadrhiri, and F. X. Girod, Nature (London) 557, 396 (2018).
  43. A. Freese and G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014024 (2021).
  44. V. D. Burkert, L. Elouadrhiri, F. X. Girod, C. Lorcé, P. Schweitzer, and P. E. Shanahan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 041002 (2023).
  45. X.-Y. Wang, F. Zeng, and J. Zhang, Chin. Phys. C 48, 054102 (2024).
  46. X.-H. Cao, F.-K. Guo, Q.-Z. Li, and D.-L. Yao, Nat. Commun. 16, 6979 (2025).
  47. H. Alharazin and J. Y. Panteleeva, Phys. Rev. D 113, 116007 (2026).
  48. C. Lorcé, L. Mantovani, and B. Pasquini, Phys. Lett. B 776, 38 (2018).
  49. P. Schweitzer and K. Tezgin, Phys. Lett. B 796, 47 (2019).
  50. Y. Liu, S. Xu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, and J. P. Vary (BLFQ), Phys. Rev. D 105, 094018 (2022).
  51. C. Lorcé, A. Mukherjee, R. Singh, and H.-Y. Won, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139792 (2025).
  52. R. L. Jaffe and A. Manohar, Nucl. Phys. B337, 509 (1990).
  53. X.-S. Chen, X.-F. Lu, W.-M. Sun, F. Wang, and T. Goldman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 232002 (2008).
  54. M. Wakamatsu, Phys. Rev. D 83, 014012 (2011).
  55. Y. Hatta, Phys. Rev. D 84, 041701 (2011).
  56. Y. Hatta, Phys. Lett. B 708, 186 (2012).
  57. E. Leader and C. Lorcé, Phys. Rep. 541, 163 (2014).
  58. C. Lorcé, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2015) 045.
  59. S. Meissner, A. Metz, and M. Schlegel, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2009) 056.
  60. C. Lorce and B. Pasquini, Phys. Rev. D 84, 014015 (2011).
  61. Y. Hatta and S. Yoshida, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2012) 080.
  62. R. Boussarie, Y. Hatta, and F. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134817 (2019).
  63. Y. V. Kovchegov, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 174.
  64. M. Engelhardt, J. R. Green, N. Hasan, S. Krieg, S. Meinel, J. Negele, A. Pochinsky, and S. Syritsyn, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074505 (2020).
  65. S. Bhattacharya, R. Boussarie, and Y. Hatta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 182002 (2022).
  66. E. Speranza and N. Weickgenannt, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 155 (2021).
  67. F. Becattini and L. Tinti, Phys. Rev. D 84, 025013 (2011).
  68. W. Florkowski, A. Kumar, and R. Ryblewski, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 108, 103709 (2019).
  69. K. Fukushima and S. Pu, Phys. Lett. B 817, 136346 (2021).
  70. S. Li, M. A. Stephanov, and H.-U. Yee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 082302 (2021).
  71. M. Buzzegoli and A. Palermo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 262301 (2024).
  72. Z. Drogosz, W. Florkowski, M. Hontarenko, and R. Ryblewski, Phys. Lett. B 861, 139244 (2025).
  73. S. Fang, K. Fukushima, S. Pu, and D.-L. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 182301 (2026).
  74. F. Becattini and C. Hoyos, arXiv:2507.09249.
  75. K. Fukushima and T. Uji, Phys. Rev. D 113, 016025 (2026).
  76. G. S. Adkins and C. R. Nappi, Phys. Lett. B137, 251 (1984).
  77. U. G. Meissner, N. Kaiser, and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A466, 685 (1987).
  78. H.-Y. Won and C. Lorcé, Phys. Rev. D 111, 094021 (2025).
  79. C. Lorcé, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 232002 (2020).
  80. R. L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. D 103, 016017 (2021).
  81. J. Y. Panteleeva and M. V. Polyakov, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014008 (2021).
  82. E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, N. Lange, U. G. Meißner, and M. V. Polyakov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 012001 (2022).
  83. M. V. Polyakov and H.-D. Son, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 156.
  84. H.-Y. Won, H.-C. Kim, and J.-Y. Kim, Phys. Lett. B 850, 138489 (2024).
  85. A. Freese, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034047 (2025).
  86. X. Ji and C. Yang, Research 9, 1155 (2026).
  87. X. Ji and C. Yang, Nucl. Phys. B1024, 117342 (2026).
  88. J.-Y. Kim and H.-C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 112, 074014 (2025).
  89. E. Leader, Phys. Rev. D 85, 051501 (2012).
  90. X. Ji, X. Xiong, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 152005 (2012).
  91. X. Ji, X. Xiong, and F. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B 717, 214 (2012).
  92. E. Leader, Phys. Lett. B 720, 120 (2013); 726, 927(E) (2013).
  93. A. Harindranath, R. Kundu, A. Mukherjee, and R. Ratabole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 039102 (2013).
  94. X. Ji, X. Xiong, and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 039103 (2013).
  95. A. Harindranath, R. Kundu, and A. Mukherjee, Phys. Lett. B 728, 63 (2014).
  96. X. Ji and F. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B 810, 135786 (2020).
  97. Y. Guo, X. Ji, and K. Shiells, Nucl. Phys. B969, 115440 (2021).
  98. Xiangdong Ji (private communications).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation