Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Excitation function for global Λ polarization in relativistic heavy-ion collisions with the core-corona model

Alejandro Ayala1, José Jorge Medina-Serna1,*, Isabel Domínguez2, and María Elena Tejeda-Yeomans3

  • 1Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-543, CdMx 04510, Mexico
  • 2Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Avenida de las Américas y Boulevard Universitarios, Ciudad Universitaria, Culiacán, 80000, Mexico
  • 3Facultad de Ciencias-CUICBAS, Universidad de Colima, Bernal Díaz del Castillo No. 340, Colonia Villas San Sebastián, Colima, 28045, Mexico

  • *Contact author: jose.medina@correo.nucleares.unam.mx

Phys. Rev. D 114, 016034 – Published 31 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fbt2-9gn1

Abstract

We compute the excitation function of the global Λ polarization in semicentral heavy-ion collisions within a core-corona framework, where the interaction region is described as a dense core and a dilute corona separated by a critical value of the participant density. An important ingredient in the model is the intrinsic polarization functions in each of the two regions. These are computed from a field-theoretical approach where the vortical motion of the medium is included in an effective fermion propagator, which we derive explicitly. The interactions in the core and the corona are transmitted by suitable mediators at finite temperature and baryon chemical potential; gluons for the former and σ-mesons for the latter. The temperatures and baryon chemical potentials are related to the collision energies along the chemical freezeout curve. By allowing the cross section for Λ production in the nuclear environment to take on values below the nucleon–nucleon threshold cross section, the calculation describes the lowest energy polarization data point. For the centralities corresponding to the experimental data, we find that the contribution from the corona is the dominant one and that a lifetime, and correspondingly a volume of this region which becomes larger for the smaller energies due to stopping, is an essential ingredient in the calculation. Overall, the model provides a good description of the excitation function across the full experimental range and predicts a robust maximum near sNN∼3  GeV that remains stable under reasonable variations of the freezeout curve and the proton–proton Λ production threshold to account for subthreshold production in a nuclear environment.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (77)

  1. X. Gou (STAR Collaboration), EPJ Web Conf. 296, 04009 (2024).
  2. R. Abou Yassine et al. (HADES Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 835, 137506 (2022).
  3. M. S. Abdallah et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 104, L061901 (2021).
  4. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 101, 044611 (2020); 105, 029902(E) (2022).
  5. J. Adam et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 98, 014910 (2018).
  6. B. Aboona et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 870, 139891 (2025).
  7. V. Abgaryan et al. (MPD Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 140 (2022).
  8. R. Abdulin et al. (MPD Collaboration), Rev. Mex. Fis. 71, 041201 (2025).
  9. J. G. Messchendorp et al., arXiv:2512.15986.
  10. N. S. Tsegelnik, V. Voronyuk, and E. E. Kolomeitsev, Particles 7, 984 (2024).
  11. V. Troshin, Phys. Part. Nucl. 55, 1161 (2024).
  12. E. Nazarova, V. Kolesnikov, P. Parfenov, A. Taranenko, O. Teryaev, V. Troshin, V. Voronyuk, and A. Zinchenko, Eur. Phys. J. A 60, 85 (2024).
  13. E. Nazarova, R. Akhat, M. Baznat, O. Teryaev, and A. Zinchenko, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 18, 429 (2021).
  14. A. Ayala, E. Cuautle, I. Domínguez, M. Rodríguez-Cahuantzi, I. Maldonado, and M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans, Phys. Part. Nucl. 52, 730 (2021).
  15. F. Becattini, F. Piccinini, and J. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. C 77, 024906 (2008).
  16. F. Becattini, G. Inghirami, V. Rolando, A. Beraudo, L. Del Zanna, A. De Pace, M. Nardi, G. Pagliara, and V. Chandra, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 406 (2015); 78, 354(E) (2018).
  17. F. Becattini, L. Bucciantini, E. Grossi, and L. Tinti, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 191 (2015).
  18. F. Becattini, I. Karpenko, M. Lisa, I. Upsal, and S. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C 95, 054902 (2017).
  19. X.-G. Huang, Nucl. Phys. A1005, 121752 (2021).
  20. N. Sass, M. Müller, O. Garcia-Montero, and H. Elfner (SMASH Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 108, 044903 (2023).
  21. I. Karpenko, arXiv:2101.04963.
  22. S. J. Barnett, Phys. Rev. 6, 239 (1915).
  23. A. Einstein and W. J. de Haas, K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Proc. Ser. B Phys. Sci. 18, 696 (1915).
  24. I. I. Gaspar, L. A. Hernández, and R. Zamora, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094020 (2023).
  25. L. A. Hernández and R. Zamora, Phys. Rev. D 111, 036003 (2025).
  26. Y. B. Ivanov and A. A. Soldatov, Particles 6, 245 (2023).
  27. O. Teryaev and V. Zakharov, EPJ Web Conf. 258, 10008 (2022).
  28. M. I. Baznat, K. K. Gudima, A. S. Sorin, and O. V. Teryaev, Phys. Rev. C 93, 031902 (2016).
  29. Y. Guo, J. Liao, E. Wang, H. Xing, and H. Zhang, EPJ Web Conf. 259, 11009 (2022).
  30. H.-Z. Wu, L.-G. Pang, X.-G. Huang, and Q. Wang, Nucl. Phys. A1005, 121831 (2021).
  31. D.-X. Wei, W.-T. Deng, and X.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. C 99, 014905 (2019).
  32. X.-L. Xia, H. Li, Z.-B. Tang, and Q. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 98, 024905 (2018).
  33. X.-G. Deng, X.-G. Huang, and Y.-G. Ma, Phys. Lett. B 835, 137560 (2022).
  34. X.-G. Deng, X.-G. Huang, Y.-G. Ma, and S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 101, 064908 (2020).
  35. I. Karpenko and F. Becattini, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 213 (2017).
  36. A. Lei, D. Wang, D.-M. Zhou, B.-H. Sa, and L. P. Csernai, Phys. Rev. C 104, 054903 (2021).
  37. W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. C 93, 064907 (2016).
  38. D. Montenegro and G. Torrieri, Phys. Rev. D 100, 056011 (2019).
  39. J. I. Kapusta, E. Rrapaj, and S. Rudaz, Phys. Rev. C 101, 031901 (2020).
  40. J. I. Kapusta, E. Rrapaj, and S. Rudaz, Phys. Rev. C 101, 024907 (2020).
  41. D. Montenegro and G. Torrieri, Phys. Rev. D 102, 036007 (2020).
  42. J. I. Kapusta, E. Rrapaj, and S. Rudaz, Phys. Rev. D 102, 125028 (2020).
  43. J. I. Kapusta, E. Rrapaj, and S. Rudaz, Phys. Rev. C 102, 064911 (2020).
  44. G. Torrieri and D. Montenegro, Phys. Rev. D 107, 076010 (2023).
  45. A. Ayala, I. Domínguez, I. Maldonado, and M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans, Phys. Rev. C 105, 034907 (2022).
  46. A. Ayala, I. Dominguez, I. Maldonado, and M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans, Particles 6, 405 (2023).
  47. A. Ayala, I. Domínguez, I. Maldonado, and M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans, Rev. Mex. Fis. Suppl. 3, 040914 (2022).
  48. A. Ayala, S. Bernal-Langarica, I. Domínguez Jiménez, I. Maldonado, J. J. Medina-Serna, J. Rendón, and M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans, Phys. Rev. D 109, 074018 (2024).
  49. A. Ayala, D. De La Cruz, S. Hernández-Ortíz, L. A. Hernández, and J. Salinas, Phys. Lett. B 801, 135169 (2020).
  50. A. Ayala, D. de la Cruz, L. A. Hernández, and J. Salinas, Phys. Rev. D 102, 056019 (2020).
  51. A. Ayala et al., Phys. Lett. B 810, 135818 (2020).
  52. A. Ayala, J. J. Medina-Serna, I. Domínguez, I. Maldonado, and M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans, Phys. Lett. B 869, 139873 (2025).
  53. A. Ayala, L. A. Hernández, K. Raya, and R. Zamora, Phys. Rev. D 103, 076021 (2021); 104, 039901(E) (2021).
  54. T. A. DeGrand and H. I. Miettinen, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1227 (1981).
  55. A. Li, W. Zuo, A.-J. Mi, and G. F. Burgio, Chin. Phys. 16, 1934 (2007).
  56. M. Dutra, O. Lourenço, S. S. Avancini, B. V. Carlson, A. Delfino, D. P. Menezes, C. Providência, S. Typel, and J. R. Stone, Phys. Rev. C 90, 055203 (2014).
  57. Z. X. Liu, C. J. Xia, W. L. Lu, Y. X. Li, J. N. Hu, and T. T. Sun, Phys. Rev. C 98, 024316 (2018).
  58. M. Oertel, C. Providência, F. Gulminelli, and A. R. Raduta, J. Phys. G 42, 075202 (2015).
  59. T.-T. Sun, C.-J. Xia, S.-S. Zhang, and M. Smith, Chin. Phys. C 42, 025101 (2018).
  60. W. German and D. J. Diener, arXiv:2208.12514.
  61. S. N. Iablokov and A. V. Kuznetsov, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1390, 012078 (2019).
  62. S. N. Iablokov and A. V. Kuznetsov, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1690, 012087 (2020).
  63. S. N. Iablokov and A. V. Kuznetsov, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 193 (2022).
  64. M. L. Bellac, Thermal Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1996).
  65. M. Nardi and H. Satz, Phys. Lett. B 442, 14 (1998).
  66. J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 062301 (2007).
  67. J. Letessier, A. Tounsi, and J. Rafelski, Phys. Lett. B 389, 586 (1996).
  68. K. Werner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 152301 (2007).
  69. A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, Nature (London) 561, 321 (2018).
  70. P. Steinbrecher (HotQCD Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A982, 847 (2019).
  71. R. Rapp and H. van Hees, Phys. Lett. B 753, 586 (2016).
  72. T. Galatyuk, P. M. Hohler, R. Rapp, F. Seck, and J. Stroth, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 131 (2016).
  73. G. Kasza and T. Csörgő, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34, 1950147 (2019).
  74. M. I. Abdulhamid et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 108, 014910 (2023).
  75. P. F. Kolb, U. W. Heinz, P. Huovinen, K. J. Eskola, and K. Tuominen, Nucl. Phys. A696, 197 (2001).
  76. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Nature (London) 548, 62 (2017).
  77. https://github.com/JorgeMedinaPhysics/PolarizationRate.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation