Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Topic modeling in new physics detection

Alexandre Alves1,*, Eduardo da Silva Almeida2,†, and Douglas Roberto de Matos Pimentel1,‡

  • *Contact author: aalves@unifesp.br
  • †Contact author: almeidae@ufba.br
  • ‡Contact author: douglas.pimentel@unifesp.br

Phys. Rev. D 114, 076020 – Published 14 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/f6dm-g4kw

Abstract

In this work, we apply topic modeling to detect new physics in proton-proton collisions at the LHC in an unsupervised way. We investigate three new physics scenarios where fully leptonic tt¯→bb¯ℓ+ℓ−νℓν¯ℓ is the main source of background without relying on jet substructure variables. We demonstrate that the algorithm remains effective even in this low-particle multiplicity framework, complementing jet tagging studies, where it is typically employed. Moreover, we demonstrate that the performance of topic modeling is competitive or even better than well-known semisupervised outlier detectors, such as isolation forest and variational autoencoders, and unsupervised algorithms like Gaussian mixture models and k-means clustering with moderate and high-background pollution in almost all new physics scenarios considered.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (49)

  1. G. Kasieczka, B. Nachman, D. Shih et al., Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 124201 (2021).
  2. J. Bardhan, T. Mandal, S. Mitra, C. Neeraj, and M. Patra, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 233, 2559 (2024).
  3. J. Hajer, Y.-Y. Li, T. Liu, and H. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 101, 076015 (2020).
  4. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 081801 (2024).
  5. R. Churchill and L. Singh, ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 1 (2022).
  6. E. M. Metodiev and J. Thaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 241602 (2018).
  7. G. Blanchard and C. Scott, in AISTATS 2014, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 33, edited by S. Kaski and J. Corander (PMLR, Reykjavik, Iceland, 2014), pp. 1–9.
  8. P. T. Komiske, E. M. Metodiev, and J. Thaler, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 059.
  9. J. Brewer, J. Thaler, and A. P. Turner, Phys. Rev. C 103, L021901 (2021).
  10. G. Aad, B. Abbott, D. C. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. D 100, 052011 (2019).
  11. E. Alvarez, F. Lamagna, and M. Szewc, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 049.
  12. M. LeBlanc, B. Nachman, and C. Sauer, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 150.
  13. B. M. Dillon, D. A. Faroughy, and J. F. Kamenik, Phys. Rev. D 100, 056002 (2019).
  14. B. M. Dillon, D. A. Faroughy, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Szewc, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 206.
  15. B. M. Dillon, D. A. Faroughy, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Szewc, Symmetry 13, 1167 (2021).
  16. D. A. Faroughy, in Proceedings of Science, Vol. 390 (2021).
  17. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (2003).
  18. X. Yan, J. Guo, Y. Lan, and X. Cheng, in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (2013).
  19. A. Srivastava and C. Sutton, in ICLR 2017–Conference Track Proceedings (2017).
  20. H. H. Nguyen, C. N. Nguyen, X. T. Dao, Q. T. Duong, D. P. T. Kim, and M.-T. Pham, arXiv:2408.13561.
  21. F. T. Liu, K. M. Ting, and Z.-H. Zhou, in 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (IEEE, 2008), pp. 413–422.
  22. C. M. Bishop and N. M. Nasrabadi, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Vol. 4 (Springer, New York, 2006).
  23. R. Krestel, P. Fankhauser, and W. Nejdl, in RecSys’09 (2009).
  24. X. Yi and J. Allan, in International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings (2008).
  25. S. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, G. W. Furnas, T. K. Landauer, and R. Harshman, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 41, 391 (1990).
  26. E. S. Hewitt and L. J. Savage, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 80, 470 (1955).
  27. T. L. Griffiths and M. Steyvers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 5228 (2004).
  28. I. Csiszar, Ann. Probab. 3, 146 (1975).
  29. F. A. de Souza, M. Barros, N. F. Castro, M. Crispim Romão, C. Neiva, and R. Pedro, Phys. Rev. D 113, 035003 (2026).
  30. E. Alvarez, M. Szewc, A. Szynkman, S. A. Tanco, and T. Tarutina, SciPost Phys. Core 6, 046 (2023).
  31. X. Ding, L. Zhao, and L. Akoglu, arXiv:2206.07647.
  32. J. Soenen, E. Van Wolputte, L. Perini, V. Vercruyssen, W. Meert, J. Davis, and H. Blockeel, The effect of hyperparameter tuning on the comparative evaluation of unsupervised anomaly detection methods, (2021-08-15).
  33. S. Profumo, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and G. Shaughnessy, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2007) 010.
  34. P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Barausse et al., arXiv:1702.00786.
  35. A. Alves, D. Gonçalves, T. Ghosh, H.-K. Guo, and K. Sinha, Phys. Lett. B 818, 136377 (2021).
  36. S. Banik, G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, and B. Mellado, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 155.
  37. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzyński, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  38. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  39. R. D. Ball, V. Bertone, S. Carrazza, L. Del Debbio, S. Forte, A. Guffanti, N. P. Hartland, and J. Rojo (NNPDF Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. B877, 290 (2013).
  40. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008).
  41. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012).
  42. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3 Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  43. J. H. Kim, K. Kong, K. T. Matchev, and M. Park, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 091801 (2019).
  44. A. Alves, E. d. S. Almeida, and D. S. V. Gonçalves, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 128 (2026).
  45. M. Terpilovskii and C. Kälin, maximtrp/bitermplus: bitermplus: v0.9.1, (2025).
  46. R. Rehurek and P. Sojka, in Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks (ELRA, Valletta, Malta, 2010).
  47. Y. Zhao, Z. Nasrullah, and Z. Li, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 20, 1 (2019), http://jmlr.org/papers/v20/19-011.html.
  48. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825 (2011).
  49. N. Kidonakis and K. Şimşek, Phys. Rev. D 114, 055019 (2026).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation