Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Rarity of rocket-driven Penrose extraction in Kerr spacetime

An T. Le*

  • College of Engineering and Computer Sciences, VinUniversity, Hanoi, Vietnam; Center for Environmental Intelligence, VinUniversity, Hanoi, Vietnam; and Intelligent Autonomous Systems, TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany

Phys. Rev. D 113, 124036 – Published 11 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/f3jn-7wcp

Abstract

We study rocket-driven Penrose extraction in the test-particle limit on a fixed Kerr background for equatorial prograde flybys under explicit steering prescriptions. A spacecraft ejects exhaust inside the ergosphere; when the exhaust attains negative Killing energy, the remaining spacecraft gains energy by 4-momentum conservation. Across 320,000 simulated trajectories spanning black hole spin, exhaust velocity, and orbital parameters, extraction with escape is rare in broad parameter scans (at most ∼1%) and requires high spin (a/M≳0.89), highly relativistic exhaust (ve≳0.91c), and finely tuned initial conditions. Under optimal tuning the success rate reaches ∼70% at a/M=0.95. For representative escape trajectories, a single periapsis impulse is more propellant-efficient than the continuous-thrust controllers studied here. All quoted thresholds are empirical and specific to the orbit family, prior, and steering protocol studied.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (21)

  1. R. Penrose and R. M. Floyd, Extraction of rotational energy from a black hole, Nat. Phys. Sci. 229, 177 (1971).
  2. D. Christodoulou, Reversible and irreversible transformations in black-hole physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 1596 (1970).
  3. J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press, and S. A. Teukolsky, Rotating black holes: Locally nonrotating frames, energy extraction, and scalar synchrotron radiation, Astrophys. J. 178, 347 (1972).
  4. R. M. Wald, Energy limits on the Penrose process, Astrophys. J. 191, 231 (1974).
  5. T. Piran, J. Shaham, and J. Katz, High efficiency of the Penrose mechanism for particle collisions, Astrophys. J. 196, L107 (1975).
  6. M. Bañados, J. Silk, and S. M. West, Kerr black holes as particle accelerators to arbitrarily high energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 111102 (2009).
  7. M. Bejger, T. Piran, M. Abramowicz, and F. Håkanson, Collisional Penrose process near the horizon of extreme Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 121101 (2012).
  8. E. Berti, R. Brito, and V. Cardoso, Ultrahigh-energy debris from the collisional Penrose process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 251103 (2015).
  9. J. D. Schnittman, Revised upper limit to energy extraction from a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 261102 (2014).
  10. E. Leiderschneider and T. Piran, Maximal efficiency of the collisional Penrose process, Phys. Rev. D 93, 043015 (2016).
  11. R. D. Blandford and R. L. Znajek, Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 179, 433 (1977).
  12. A. Tchekhovskoy, R. Narayan, and J. C. McKinney, Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 418, L79 (2011).
  13. L. Comisso and F. A. Asenjo, Magnetic reconnection as a mechanism for energy extraction from rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 103, 023014 (2021).
  14. S. Koide and K. Arai, Energy extraction from a rotating black hole by magnetic reconnection in the ergosphere, Astrophys. J. 682, 1124 (2008).
  15. S. Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1983).
  16. M. Bhat, S. Dhurandhar, and N. Dadhich, Energetics of the Kerr-Newman black hole by the Penrose process, J. Astrophys. Astron. 6, 85 (1985).
  17. A. A. Grib, Y. V. Pavlov, and V. D. Vertogradov, Geodesics with negative energy in the ergosphere of rotating black holes, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 29, 1450110 (2014).
  18. C. J. Clopper and E. S. Pearson, The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial, Biometrika 26, 404 (1934).
  19. B. Efron, Better bootstrap confidence intervals, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82, 171 (1987).
  20. Y. V. Pavlov and O. B. Zaslavskii, Particle decay, Oberth effect and a relativistic rocket in the Schwarzschild background, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 32, 2250143 (2023).
  21. A. Le, Simulation code, GitHub, https://github.com/anindex/penrose_process (2026), Animated trajectory visualizations are provided in the codebase.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation