Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Constituent-quark-model based coupled-channels calculation of the bbc¯c¯ and bcb¯c¯ tetraquark systems

P. G. Ortega1,2,*, D. R. Entem1,2,†, F. Fernández2,‡, and J. Segovia3,§

  • *Contact author: pgortega@usal.es
  • †Contact author: entem@usal.es
  • ‡Contact author: fdz@usal.es
  • §Contact author: jsegovia@upo.es

Phys. Rev. D 112, 054016 – Published 10 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ddp1-5cqg

Abstract

We perform a coupled-channels study of the bbc¯c¯ and bcb¯c¯ tetraquark systems in a molecular approach using a constituent quark model which has been widely used to satisfactorily describe a broad range of properties of heavy quark hadron systems, either conventional or exotic. Within a molecular framework, the interaction in the heavy quark sector is governed by gluon exchange or confinement forces that are inherently color-dependent. While the BcBc system contains two identical quarks, enabling stronger interactions via exchange diagrams, the forces in the BcB¯c and (cc¯)−(bb¯) systems are expected to be significantly weaker. Consequently, the theoretical and experimental analysis of Bc(*)Bc(*), Bc(*)B¯c(*), and charmonium-bottomonium bound structures could play a crucial role in clarifying the dominant mechanisms responsible for the formation of fully heavy tetraquarks. For the bbc¯c¯ tetraquark sector, we find several resonance states with different spin-parity quantum numbers. These resonances are characterized by their proximity, but not too close, to the Bc(*)Bc(*) thresholds and their large total decay widths, indicating strong decay channels. In contrast, our analysis of the bcb¯c¯ tetraquark sector reveals no bound states, virtual states, or resonances; suggesting that tetraquark states of the (cc¯)−(bb¯) or Bc(*)B¯c(*) molecular type are unlikely to be formed, within our model assumptions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (64)

  1. S. K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003).
  2. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252001 (2013).
  3. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 242001 (2013).
  4. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 102001 (2021).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 082001 (2021).
  6. A. Bondar et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 122001 (2012).
  7. A. Garmash et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 212001 (2016).
  8. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Nat. Phys. 18, 751 (2022).
  9. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Nat. Commun. 13, 3351 (2022).
  10. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 102, 112003 (2020).
  11. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 013.
  12. K. Yi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1850224 (2019).
  13. L. C. Bland et al. (ANDY Collaboration), arXiv:1909.03124.
  14. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 086.
  15. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 808, 135578 (2020).
  16. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Sci. Bull. 65, 1983 (2020).
  17. Y. Iwasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1266 (1976).
  18. K.-T. Chao, Z. Phys. C 7, 317 (1981).
  19. J. P. Ader, J. M. Richard, and P. Taxil, Phys. Rev. D 25, 2370 (1982).
  20. A. M. Badalian, B. L. Ioffe, and A. V. Smilga, Nucl. Phys. B281, 85 (1987).
  21. V. R. Debastiani and F. S. Navarra, Chin. Phys. C 43, 013105 (2019).
  22. W. Chen, H.-X. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Lett. B 773, 247 (2017).
  23. G.-J. Wang, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 100, 096013 (2019).
  24. M. A. Bedolla, J. Ferretti, C. D. Roberts, and E. Santopinto, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1004 (2020).
  25. J. F. Giron and R. F. Lebed, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074003 (2020).
  26. X. Jin, Y. Xue, H. Huang, and J. Ping, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1083 (2020).
  27. C. Deng, H. Chen, and J. Ping, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014001 (2021).
  28. R. N. Faustov, V. O. Galkin, and E. M. Savchenko, Universe 7, 94 (2021).
  29. Z.-G. Wang, Chin. Phys. C 44, 113106 (2020).
  30. H. Mutuk, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 367 (2021).
  31. Q.-F. Lü, D.-Y. Chen, and Y.-B. Dong, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 871 (2020).
  32. M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114039 (2020).
  33. X.-Z. Weng, X.-L. Chen, W.-Z. Deng, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 103, 034001 (2021).
  34. J. Sonnenschein and D. Weissman, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 25 (2021).
  35. M. C. Gordillo, F. De Soto, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114007 (2020).
  36. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014006 (2021).
  37. X.-K. Dong, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and A. Nefediev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 132001 (2021); 127, 119901(E) (2021).
  38. R. M. Albuquerque, S. Narison, A. Rabemananjara, D. Rabetiarivony, and G. Randriamanatrika, Phys. Rev. D 102, 094001 (2020).
  39. Z.-H. Guo and J. A. Oller, Phys. Rev. D 103, 034024 (2021).
  40. S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, B. Barsbay, and H. Sundu, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 935 (2023).
  41. P. Niu, Z. Zhang, Q. Wang, and M.-L. Du, Sci. Bull. 68, 800 (2023).
  42. C. Hughes, E. Eichten, and C. T. H. Davies, Phys. Rev. D 97, 054505 (2018).
  43. X. Chen, Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 106 (2019).
  44. J. Wu, Y.-R. Liu, K. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094015 (2018).
  45. A. V. Berezhnoy, A. V. Luchinsky, and A. A. Novoselov, Phys. Rev. D 86, 034004 (2012).
  46. P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094023 (2023).
  47. P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, F. Fernandez, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054038 (2024).
  48. J. Vijande, F. Fernandez, and A. Valcarce, J. Phys. G 31, 481 (2005).
  49. J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, F. Fernandez, and E. Hernandez, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 22, 1330026 (2013).
  50. E. Hiyama, Y. Kino, and M. Kamimura, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 223 (2003).
  51. J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 52, 1083 (1937).
  52. Y. C. Tang, M. Lemere, and D. R. Thompson, Phys. Rep. 47, 167 (1978).
  53. P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, J. Phys. G 40, 065107 (2013).
  54. D. Diakonov and V. Y. Petrov, Nucl. Phys. B272, 457 (1986).
  55. D. Diakonov, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 173 (2003).
  56. J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Lett. B 662, 33 (2008).
  57. G. S. Bali, Phys. Rep. 343, 1 (2001).
  58. G. S. Bali, H. Neff, T. Duessel, T. Lippert, and K. Schilling (SESAM Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 71, 114513 (2005).
  59. J. Segovia, A. M. Yasser, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. D 78, 114033 (2008).
  60. J. Segovia, P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074027 (2016).
  61. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 223 (2020).
  62. F. Fernández, P. G. Ortega, and D. R. Entem, Front. Phys. 7, 233 (2020).
  63. R. Machleidt, Computational Nuclear Physics 2: Nuclear Reactions, edited by K. Langanke, J. A. Maruhn, and S. E. Koonin (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993), pp. 1–29.
  64. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation