Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Measurement of reactor antineutrino oscillation parameters using the full 3800-day dataset of the RENO experiment

S. Jeon1,2,3, H. I. Kim2, J. H. Choi1, H. I. Jang4, J. S. Jang5, K. K. Joo6, D. E. Jung6, J. G. Kim7, J. H. Kim7 et al. (RENO Collaboration)

J. H. Kim7, J. Y. Kim6, S. B. Kim2, S. Y. Kim6, W. Kim8, E. Kwon7, D. H. Lee9, H. G. Lee6, W. J. Lee2, I. T. Lim6, D. H. Moon6, M. Y. Pac1, J. S. Park8, R. G. Park6, H. Seo2, J. W. Seo7, C. D. Shin9, B. S. Yang6, J. Yoo2, S. G. Yoon2, I. S. Yeo1, and I. Yu7 (RENO Collaboration)

Phys. Rev. D 111, 112006 – Published 17 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dc6j-5ky6

Abstract

We report an updated neutrino mixing angle of θ13 obtained from a complete data sample of the RENO experiment. The experiment has measured the amplitude and frequency of reactor electron antineutrino (ν¯e) oscillations at the Hanbit nuclear power plant, Younggwang, Korea, since August 2011. As of March 2023, the data acquisition was completed after a total of 3800 live days of detector operation. The observed candidates via inverse beta decay with the neutron capture on the gadolinium channel are 1,211,995 (144,667) in the near (far) detector. Based on an observed energy-dependent reactor neutrino disappearance, neutrino oscillation parameters of θ13 and |Δmee2| are precisely determined as sin22θ13=0.0920−0.0042+0.0044(stat)−0.0041+0.0041(syst) and |Δmee2|=[2.57−0.11+0.10(stat)−0.05+0.05(syst)]×10−3  eV2. Compared to the previously published RENO results, the precision is improved from 7.5% to 6.4% for sin22θ13 and from 5.2% to 4.5% for |Δmee2|. The statistical error of the measurement has reached our goal and is hardly improved with additional data taking.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (32)

  1. B. Pontecorvo, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 34, 247 (1957).
  2. Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870 (1962).
  3. J. K. Ahn et al. (RENO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 191802 (2012).
  4. F. P. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 171803 (2012).
  5. Y. Abe et al. (Double Chooz Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 131801 (2012).
  6. G. Bak et al. (RENO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 201801 (2018).
  7. F. P. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 161802 (2023).
  8. K. Abe et al. (Hyper-Kamiokande Proto-Collaboration), arXiv:1805.04163.
  9. B. Abi et al. (DUNE Collaboration), J. Instrum. 15, T08008 (2020).
  10. J. H. Choi et al. (RENO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 211801 (2016).
  11. S. Petcov, and M. Piai, Phys. Lett. B 533, 94 (2002).
  12. H. Nunokawa, S. Parke, and R. Z. Funchal, Phys. Rev. D 72, 013009 (2005).
  13. S. Yamada et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 57, 428 (2010).
  14. J. K. Ahn et al. (RENO Collaboration), arXiv:1003.1391.
  15. S. H. Seo et al. (RENO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 98, 012002 (2018).
  16. H. S. Kim, New Phys. (Korean Phys. Soc) 62, 631 (2012).
  17. H. S. Kim et al. (RENO Collaboration), J. Instrum. 18, P07020 (2023).
  18. J. Crespo-Anadón, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 265–266, 99 (2015).
  19. F. P. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 95, 072006 (2017).
  20. P. Vogel, and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 60, 053003 (1999).
  21. J. Park et al. (RENO Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 707, 45 (2013).
  22. F. P. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 93, 072011 (2016).
  23. Y. S. Liu, A. Meliksetian, J. A. Rathkopf, D. C. Little, F. Nakano, M. J. Poploski, S. L. Davidson, and N. A. Silva, ANC: A westinghouse advanced nodal computing code, westinghouse Report No. WCAP-10965-P-A(P), 1986.
  24. Y. V. Klimov, V. I. Kopeikin, L. A. Mikaélyan, K. V. Ozerov, and V. V. Sinev, At. Energ. 76, 123 (1994).
  25. V. I. Kopeikin, L. A. Mikaelyan, and V. V. Sinev, Phys. At. Nucl. 67, 1892 (2004).
  26. Z. Djurcic, J. A. Detwiler, A. Piepke, V. R. Foster, L. Miller, and G. Gratta, J. Phys. G 36, 045002 (2009).
  27. X. B. Ma et al., Mod. Phys. Lett. A 31, 1650120 (2016).
  28. X. Ma, R. M. Qiu, and Y. X. Chen, Nucl. Phys. A958, 211 (2017).
  29. T. A. Mueller et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 054615 (2011).
  30. P. Huber, Phys. Rev. C 84, 024617 (2011).
  31. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  32. Y. Abe et al. (Double Chooz Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 086.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation