Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Study on the properties of hidden-charm pentaquarks with double strangeness

Xuejie Liu1,*, Yue Tan2,†, Xiaoyun Chen5,‡, Dianyong Chen3,6,§, Hongxia Huang4,∥, and Jialun Ping4,¶

  • *Contact author: 1830592517@qq.com
  • †Contact author: tanyue@ycit.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: xychen@jit.edu.cn
  • §Contact author: chendy@seu.edu.cn
  • ∥Contact author: hxhuang@njnu.edu.cn
  • Contact author: jlping@njnu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 014036 – Published 22 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/cwz9-12k6

Abstract

Since the LHCb collaboration successively reported the hidden-charm exotic states Pc and Pcs, these exotic states have rightfully attracted significant attention from theoretical perspectives. Motivated by these exotic states, this study systematically investigates the hidden-charm double-strange pentaquark system with the quark configuration nsscc¯ using the resonating group method within the framework of the quark delocalization color screening model. The dynamical estimations, incorporating channel coupling, identify five resonance states in the hidden-charm double-strange systems, denoted as Ξc′D¯s* and Ξc*D¯s* with JP=1/2−, Ξc*D¯s, Ξc*D¯s*, and Ω*D¯* with JP=3/2−, through scattering phase shifts processes of various channels. Ξc′D¯s* and Ξc*D¯s* with JP=1/2−, with mass range and decay widths of (4684 MeV–4688 MeV, 6.4 MeV–24.2 MeV) and (4751 MeV–4756 MeV, 3.2 MeV–18.7 MeV), can be derived from the scattering processes of channels Ξηc, ΞJ/ψ, and ΞcD¯s, it should be noted that resonance state Ξc′D¯s*, in addition to the channels mentioned above, can also be observed in Ξ*J/ψ and ΞcD¯s*. For the quantum number JP=3/2−, Ξc*D¯s* and Ω*D¯* can be identified in channels ΞJ/ψ, Ξ*J/ψ and ΞcD¯s*, and Ξ*J/ψ and Ξc′D¯s*, respectively, the estimated masses and decay widths of these resonance states range from approximately (4749 MeV–4755 MeV, 16.4 MeV) and (4771 MeV-4772 MeV, 18.8 MeV). However, the residual resonance state Ξc*D¯s, for which the estimated mass and decay width are about 4600 MeV and 21.7 MeV, is expected to be found only in channel ΞcD¯s*. Given the current theoretical estimations, experiments are anticipated to further explore hidden-charm double-strange pentaquark states through the possible decay channels, thereby offering a strong theoretical foundation for their experimental investigation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (108)

  1. M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964).
  2. S. K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003).
  3. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 71, 071103 (2005).
  4. D. Acosta et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 072001 (2004).
  5. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 152001 (2009).
  6. V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 162002 (2004).
  7. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1972 (2012).
  8. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2013) 154.
  9. X. Liu, Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 3815 (2014).
  10. A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai, and S. Yasui, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 062C01 (2016).
  11. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 639, 1 (2016).
  12. J.-M. Richard, Few Body Syst. 57, 1185 (2016).
  13. R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143 (2017).
  14. S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, and D. Zieminska, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015003 (2018).
  15. F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018); 94, 029901(E) (2022).
  16. Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237 (2019).
  17. N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, Phys. Rep. 873, 1 (2020).
  18. L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 1019, 1 (2023).
  19. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023).
  20. Z.-G. Wang, arXiv:2502.11351.
  21. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015).
  22. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 082003 (2016); 117, 109902(A) (2016); 118, 119901(A) (2017).
  23. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222001 (2019).
  24. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 062001 (2022).
  25. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 102, 112012 (2020).
  26. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Sci. Bull. 66, 1278 (2021).
  27. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 031901 (2023).
  28. R. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Nucl. Phys. A954, 406 (2016).
  29. H.-X. Chen, E.-L. Cui, W. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele, and S.-L. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 572 (2016).
  30. K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Phys. Rev. D 95, 094016 (2017).
  31. K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Phys. Lett. B 782, 694 (2018).
  32. K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Chin. Phys. C 45, 053103 (2021).
  33. J. He, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 393 (2019).
  34. J.-T. Zhu, L.-Q. Song, and J. He, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074007 (2021).
  35. M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, F.-Z. Peng, M. Sánchez Sánchez, L.-S. Geng, A. Hosaka, and M. Pavon Valderrama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 242001 (2019).
  36. C.-J. Xiao, Y. Huang, Y.-B. Dong, L.-S. Geng, and D.-Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014022 (2019).
  37. Q.-F. Lü and Y.-B. Dong, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074020 (2016).
  38. X. Hu and J. Ping, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 118 (2022).
  39. L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, in 18th International Conference on Hadron Spectroscopy and Structure (2020), pp. 313–317, arXiv:1911.09250.
  40. R. Chen, X. Liu, X.-Q. Li, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 132002 (2015).
  41. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 172001 (2015).
  42. J. He, Phys. Lett. B 753, 547 (2016).
  43. U.-G. Meißner and J. A. Oller, Phys. Lett. B 751, 59 (2015).
  44. L. Roca, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 92, 094003 (2015).
  45. H.-X. Chen, Chin. Phys. C 46, 093105 (2022).
  46. M.-J. Yan, F.-Z. Peng, M. Sánchez Sánchez, and M. Pavon Valderrama, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 574 (2022).
  47. Q. Wu, D.-Y. Chen, and R. Ji, Chin. Phys. Lett. 38, 071301 (2021).
  48. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and X.-H. Liu, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 409 (2021).
  49. K. Phumphan, K. Xu, W. Ruangyoo, C.-C. Chen, A. Limphirat, and Y. Yan, arXiv:2105.03150.
  50. M.-L. Du, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, J. A. Oller, and Q. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 157.
  51. J.-X. Lu, M.-Z. Liu, R.-X. Shi, and L.-S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034022 (2021).
  52. F. Gao and H.-S. Li, Chin. Phys. C 46, 123111 (2022).
  53. N. Yalikun and B.-S. Zou, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094026 (2022).
  54. M. I. Eides, V. Y. Petrov, and M. V. Polyakov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35, 2050151 (2020).
  55. A. Ali and A. Y. Parkhomenko, Phys. Lett. B 793, 365 (2019).
  56. Z.-G. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2050003 (2020).
  57. J.-B. Cheng and Y.-R. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 100, 054002 (2019).
  58. X.-Z. Weng, X.-L. Chen, W.-Z. Deng, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 100, 016014 (2019).
  59. R. Zhu, X. Liu, H. Huang, and C.-F. Qiao, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134869 (2019).
  60. A. Pimikov, H.-J. Lee, and P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014002 (2020).
  61. W. Ruangyoo, K. Phumphan, C.-C. Chen, A. Limphirat, and Y. Yan, J. Phys. G 49, 075001 (2022).
  62. C. Fernández-Ramírez, A. Pilloni, M. Albaladejo, A. Jackura, V. Mathieu, M. Mikhasenko, J. A. Silva-Castro, and A. P. Szczepaniak (JPAC Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 092001 (2019).
  63. S. X. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D 103, L111503 (2021).
  64. T. J. Burns and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054029 (2022).
  65. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1062 (2024).
  66. F.-L. Wang, R. Chen, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 103, 034014 (2021).
  67. J. A. Marsé-Valera, V. K. Magas, and A. Ramos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 091903 (2023).
  68. J. A. Marsé-Valera, V. K. Magas, and A. Ramos, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054020 (2025).
  69. V. Magas, A. Marsé-Valera, and A. Ramos, EPJ Web Conf. 291, 05002 (2024).
  70. L. Roca, J. Song, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094005 (2024).
  71. P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Lett. B 838, 137747 (2023).
  72. P.-P. Shi, F. Huang, and W.-L. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 237 (2021).
  73. U. Özdem, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 624 (2025).
  74. K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 543 (2022).
  75. X.-W. Wang and Z.-G. Wang, Chin. Phys. C 47, 013109 (2023).
  76. J. Ferretti and E. Santopinto, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 119.
  77. J. Ferretti and E. Santopinto, Sci. Bull. 67, 1209 (2022).
  78. E. Oset, L. Roca, and M. Whitehead, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034016 (2024).
  79. J.-J. Wu, R. Molina, E. Oset, and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. C 84, 015202 (2011).
  80. C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 88, 056012 (2013).
  81. A. De Rujula, H. Georgi, and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D 12, 147 (1975).
  82. N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Rev. D 20, 1191 (1979).
  83. N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2653 (1979); 23, 817(E) (1981).
  84. N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Rev. D 18, 4187 (1978).
  85. F. Wang, G.-h. Wu, L.-j. Teng, and J. T. Goldman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2901 (1992).
  86. L. Chen, H. Pang, H. Huang, J. Ping, and F. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 76, 014001 (2007).
  87. M. Chen, H. Huang, J. Ping, and F. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 83, 015202 (2011).
  88. G.-H. Wu, L.-J. Teng, J. L. Ping, F. Wang, and J. T. Goldman, Phys. Rev. C 53, 1161 (1996).
  89. H. Huang, P. Xu, J. Ping, and F. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 84, 064001 (2011).
  90. F. Wang, D. Qing, P. Xu, and J.-L. Ping, Nucl. Phys. A631, 462C (1998).
  91. H. Huang, C. Deng, J. Ping, and F. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 624 (2016).
  92. H. Huang, J. Ping, and F. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 89, 035201 (2014).
  93. X. Liu, D. Chen, H. Huang, J. Ping, X. Chen, and Y. Yang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 66, 221012 (2023).
  94. M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018).
  95. J. Vijande, F. Fernandez, and A. Valcarce, J. Phys. G 31, 481 (2005).
  96. F. Fernandez and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. A455, 720 (1986).
  97. G.-h. Wu, J.-L. Ping, L.-j. Teng, F. Wang, and J. T. Goldman, Nucl. Phys. A673, 279 (2000).
  98. J.-L. Ping, F. Wang, and J. T. Goldman, Nucl. Phys. A657, 95 (1999).
  99. H. R. Pang, J. L. Ping, F. Wang, and J. T. Goldman, Phys. Rev. C 65, 014003 (2002).
  100. F. Huang and W. L. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 98, 074018 (2018).
  101. M. Xu, M. Yu, and L. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 092301 (2008).
  102. Z. Xia, S. Fan, X. Zhu, H. Huang, and J. Ping, Phys. Rev. C 105, 025201 (2022).
  103. H. Huang, J. Ping, X. Zhu, and F. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 805 (2022).
  104. M. Kamimura, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 62, 236 (1977).
  105. J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 52, 1083 (1937).
  106. D. L. Hill and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 89, 1102 (1953).
  107. J. J. Griffin and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 108, 311 (1957).
  108. X. Liu, Y. Tan, X. Chen, D. Chen, H. Huang, and J. Ping, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094008 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation