- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Drell-Yan production in universal theories beyond dimension-six SMEFT

Tyler Corbett1,*, Jay Desai2,†, O. J. P. Éboli3,‡, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia2,4,5,§, Matheus Martines3,6,∥, and Peter Reimitz3,¶

  • *Contact author: corbett.t.s@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: jay.desai@stonybrook.edu
  • ‡Contact author: eboli@if.usp.br
  • §Contact author: concha.gonzalez-garcia@stonybrook.edu
  • ∥Contact author: matheus.martines.silva@usp.br
  • Contact author: peter@if.usp.br
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 112, 013009 – Published 17 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/cktt-qrmn

Abstract

We study Drell-Yan production in universal theories consistently including effects beyond dimension six in the Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT). Within universal SMEFT and with C and P conservation we find that 11 dimension-eight operators contribute in addition to the six contributing at dimension six. We first work in an operator basis in which operators with higher derivatives of the bosonic fields have been rotated by equations of motion in favor of combinations of operators involving SM fermion currents. We derive the general form of the amplitudes consistently in the expansion to O(Λ−4) and identify eight combinations of the 17 Wilson coefficients which are physically distinguishable by studying the invariant mass distribution of the lepton pairs produced. We then introduce an extension of the parametrization of universal effects in terms of oblique parameters obtained by linearly expanding the self-energies of the electroweak gauge bosons to O(q6). It contains 11 oblique parameters of which only eight are generated within SMEFT at dimension eight: S^, T^, W, Y, U^, X, plus two additional which we label W′ and Y′ and show how they match at linear order with the eight identified combinations of operator coefficients. We then perform a combined analysis of a variety of LHC data on the neutral- and charged-current Drell-Yan processes with the aim of constraining the eight combinations. We compare and combine the LHC bounds with those from electroweak precision W and Z pole observables which can only provide constraints in four directions of the eight-parameter space. We present the results in terms of limits on the eight effective Wilson coefficients as well as on the eight oblique parameters. In each case, we study the dependence of the derived constraints on the order of the expansion considered.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (73)

  1. S. D. Drell and T.-M. Yan, Massive lepton pair production in hadron-hadron collisions at high-energies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 316 (1970); 25, 902(E) (1970).
  2. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Measurement of the double-differential high-mass Drell-Yan cross section in pp collisions at s=8  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 009.
  3. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Measurements of differential and double-differential Drell-Yan cross sections in proton-proton collisions at 8 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 147 (2015).
  4. G. Walia (CMS Collaboration), Single and double differential Drell-Yan cross section measurements using the CMS detector, Springer Proc. Phys. 203, 517 (2018).
  5. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Measurement of the Drell–Yan forward-backward asymmetry and of the effective leptonic weak mixing angle in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 866, 139526 (2025).
  6. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Measurement of double-differential charged-current Drell-Yan cross-sections at high transverse masses in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, arXiv:2502.21088.
  7. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139  fb−1 of pp collision data collected at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 796, 68 (2019).
  8. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for resonant and nonresonant new phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 208.
  9. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for a heavy charged boson in events with a charged lepton and missing transverse momentum from pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 100, 052013 (2019).
  10. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for new physics in the lepton plus missing transverse momentum final state in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 067.
  11. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  12. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for WW/WZ resonance production in ℓνqq final states in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 042.
  13. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  14. E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators II: Yukawa dependence, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 035.
  15. B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia, and H. Murayama, 2,84,30, 993,560, 15456,11962,261485,…: Higher dimension operators in the SM EFT, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 016; 09 (2019) 019(E).
  16. G. Cacciapaglia, C. Csaki, G. Marandella, and A. Strumia, The minimal set of electroweak precision parameters, Phys. Rev. D 74, 033011 (2006).
  17. A. Greljo, S. Iranipour, Z. Kassabov, M. Madigan, J. Moore, J. Rojo, M. Ubiali, and C. Voisey, Parton distributions in the SMEFT from high-energy Drell-Yan tails, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 122.
  18. S. Alioli, M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo, and J. T. Ruderman, Catching a new force by the tail, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 101801 (2018).
  19. H. El Faham, K. Mimasu, D. Pagani, C. Severi, E. Vryonidou, and M. Zaro, Electroweak corrections in the SMEFT: Four-fermion operators at high energies, arXiv:2412.16076.
  20. V. Bresó-Pla, A. Falkowski, and M. González-Alonso, AFB in the SMEFT: Precision Z physics at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 021.
  21. J. de Blas, M. Chala, and J. Santiago, Global constraints on lepton-quark contact interactions, Phys. Rev. D 88, 095011 (2013).
  22. S. Dawson, P. P. Giardino, and A. Ismail, Standard model EFT and the Drell-Yan process at high energy, Phys. Rev. D 99, 035044 (2019).
  23. S. Dawson and P. P. Giardino, New physics through Drell-Yan standard model EFT measurements at NLO, Phys. Rev. D 104, 073004 (2021).
  24. M. Farina, G. Panico, D. Pappadopulo, J. T. Ruderman, R. Torre, and A. Wulzer, Energy helps accuracy: Electroweak precision tests at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 772, 210 (2017).
  25. G. Panico, L. Ricci, and A. Wulzer, High-energy EFT probes with fully differential Drell-Yan measurements, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 086.
  26. R. Torre, L. Ricci, and A. Wulzer, On the W&Y interpretation of high-energy Drell-Yan measurements, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 144.
  27. A. Horne, J. Pittman, M. Snedeker, W. Shepherd, and J. W. Walker, Shift-type SMEFT effects in dileptons at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 118.
  28. T. Kim and A. Martin, Monolepton production in SMEFT to O(1/Λ4) and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 124.
  29. S. Alte, M. König, and W. Shepherd, Consistent searches for SMEFT effects in non-resonant dilepton events, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2019) 144.
  30. S. Alioli, R. Boughezal, E. Mereghetti, and F. Petriello, Novel angular dependence in Drell-Yan lepton production via dimension-8 operators, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135703 (2020).
  31. R. Boughezal, E. Mereghetti, and F. Petriello, Dilepton production in the SMEFT at O(1/Λ4), Phys. Rev. D 104, 095022 (2021).
  32. R. Boughezal, Y. Huang, and F. Petriello, Exploring the SMEFT at dimension eight with Drell-Yan transverse momentum measurements, Phys. Rev. D 106, 036020 (2022).
  33. L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari, and F. Wilsch, HighPT: A tool for high-pT Drell-Yan tails beyond the standard model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 289, 108749 (2023).
  34. L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, F. Jaffredo, O. Sumensari, and F. Wilsch, Drell-Yan tails beyond the standard model, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 064.
  35. S. Grossi and R. Torre, More variables or more bins? Impact on the EFT interpretation of Drell–Yan measurements, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 713 (2024).
  36. T. Corbett, Top-down and bottom-up: Studying the SMEFT beyond leading order in 1/Λ2, SciPost Phys. Core 7, 053 (2024).
  37. L. Allwicher, D. A. Faroughy, M. Martines, O. Sumensari, and F. Wilsch, On the EFT validity for Drell-Yan tails at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 463 (2025).
  38. X. Li, B. Yan, and C. P. Yuan, Lam-Tung relation breaking in Z boson production as a probe of SMEFT effects, Phys. Rev. D 111, 073007 (2025).
  39. S. Dawson, M. Forslund, and M. Schnubel, SMEFT matching to Z’ models at dimension eight, Phys. Rev. D 110, 015002 (2024).
  40. J. D. Wells and Z. Zhang, Effective theories of universal theories, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 123.
  41. T. Corbett, J. Desai, O. J. P. Eboli, and M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Dimension-eight operator basis for universal standard model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 110, 033003 (2024).
  42. H. D. Politzer, Power corrections at short distances, Nucl. Phys. B172, 349 (1980).
  43. H. Georgi, On-shell effective field theory, Nucl. Phys. B361, 339 (1991).
  44. C. Arzt, Reduced effective Lagrangians, Phys. Lett. B 342, 189 (1995).
  45. H. Simma, Equations of motion for effective Lagrangians and penguins in rare B decays, Z. Phys. C 61, 67 (1994).
  46. J. C. Criado and M. Pérez-Victoria, Field redefinitions in effective theories at higher orders, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 038.
  47. C. W. Murphy, Dimension-8 operators in the standard model effective field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 174.
  48. R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, D. Pagani, H. S. Shao, and M. Zaro, The automation of next-to-leading order electroweak calculations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 185.
  49. N. D. Christensen and C. Duhr, feynrules: Feynman rules made easy, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1614 (2009).
  50. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, feynrules 2.0: A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  51. T. Corbett, J. Desai, O. J. P. Éboli, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Martines, and P. Reimitz, Impact of dimension-eight SMEFT operators in the electroweak precision observables and triple gauge couplings analysis in universal SMEFT, Phys. Rev. D 107, 115013 (2023).
  52. M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46, 381 (1992).
  53. R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi, and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys. B703, 127 (2004).
  54. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, A brief introduction to pythia 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008).
  55. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaitre, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3 Collaboration), delphes 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  56. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, fastjet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012).
  57. C. Bierlich et al., Robust independent validation of experiment and theory: rivet version 3, SciPost Phys. 8, 026 (2020).
  58. A. Buckley, D. Kar, and K. Nordström, Fast simulation of detector effects in rivet, SciPost Phys. 8, 025 (2020).
  59. M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, and M. Wiesemann, Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 537 (2018).
  60. S. Schael et al. (SLD Electroweak Group, DELPHI, ALEPH, SLD, SLD Heavy Flavour Group, OPAL, LEP Electroweak Working Group, and L3 Collaboration), Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rep. 427, 257 (2006).
  61. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  62. J. de Blas, M. Pierini, L. Reina, and L. Silvestrini, Impact of the recent measurements of the top-quark and W-Boson masses on electroweak precision fits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 271801 (2022).
  63. M. Chala and X. Li, Positivity restrictions on the mixing of dimension-eight SMEFT operators, Phys. Rev. D 109, 065015 (2024).
  64. M. McCullough, M. Riembau, and L. Ricci, Boundaries of universal theories, Phys. Rev. D 111, 015031 (2025).
  65. M. Chala and J. Santiago, Positivity bounds in the standard model effective field theory beyond tree level, Phys. Rev. D 105, L111901 (2022).
  66. HepData, 10.17182/hepdata.75023.v1/t2.
  67. ATLAS Collaboration, https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/STDM-2018-41/.
  68. HepData, 10.17182/hepdata.94786.v1/t6.
  69. HepData, 10.17182/hepdata.94786.v1/t7.
  70. HepData, 10.17182/hepdata.101186.v2/t3.
  71. HepData, 10.17182/hepdata.101186.v2/t4.
  72. HepData, 10.17182/hepdata.106058.v1/t8.
  73. HepData, 10.17182/hepdata.106058.v1/t9.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 112, 013009– Published 17 July, 2025
  • Received 1 April 2025
  • Accepted 17 June 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation