Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Constraining neutrino-nucleon form factors with charged-current scattering at the Electron-Ion Collider

Guang Yang1 and Praveen Kumar1,2

Phys. Rev. D 113, 116031 – Published 22 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/btj9-n88g

Abstract

Next-generation neutrino oscillation experiments such as the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment require percent-level knowledge of neutrino-nucleon interaction cross sections. The nucleon axial form factor FA(Q2), parametrized by the axial mass MA, is the dominant source of uncertainty in the quasielastic channel, and the parity-violating structure function xF3 is poorly constrained on free nucleons. We propose using charged-current (CC) electron-proton scattering at the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) to address both problems simultaneously. The measurement exploits three key features of the EIC: (1) helicity-selective electron bunches provide in situ electromagnetic background rejection; (2) a longitudinally polarized proton target enables extraction of FA(Q2) through the target-spin asymmetry AUL; and (3) the y-distribution leverage in CC deep inelastic scattering (DIS) separates F2 and xF3 on a free proton, without nuclear corrections. Using a Fisher information analysis at s=141  GeV with 500  fb−1 of integrated luminosity, we project the Cramér-Rao statistical floor of δMA≈0.03  GeV (3%). Incorporating first-order realistic detector effects, such as zero-degree calorimeter acceptance, Q2 smearing (5%), and background noise from helicity subtraction, the projected sensitivity is severely background-limited due to the small signal-to-background ratio (S/B≈3×10−4) in the elastic channel. Achieving competitive sensitivity (δMA≈0.14  GeV) would require ∼10−7 background suppression, 3 orders of magnitude beyond current projections. The CC DIS y distribution provides subpercent extraction of xF3W− over 0.05<x<0.5, representing the most robust electroweak measurement in the near term.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (19)

  1. B. Abi et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Deep underground neutrino experiment (DUNE), Far detector technical design report, volume II: DUNE physics, arXiv:2002.03005.
  2. J. A. Formaggio and G. P. Zeller, From eV to EeV: Neutrino cross sections across energy scales, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1307 (2012),
  3. J. Arrington, C. D. Roberts, and J. M. Zanotti, Nucleon electromagnetic form factors, J. Phys. G 34, S23 (2007).
  4. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  5. V. Bernard, L. Elouadrhiri, and U.-G. Meißner, Axial structure of the nucleon, J. Phys. G 28, R1 (2002).
  6. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), First measurement of the muon neutrino charged current quasielastic double differential cross section, Phys. Rev. D 81, 092005 (2010).
  7. T. Cai et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Measurement of the axial vector form factor from antineutrino–proton scattering, Nature (London) 614, 48 (2023).
  8. M. Martini, M. Ericson, G. Chanfray, and J. Marteau, Unified approach for nucleon knock-out and coherent and incoherent pion production in neutrino interactions with nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 80, 065501 (2009).
  9. J. Nieves, I. Ruiz Simo, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Inclusive charged-current neutrino-nucleus reactions, Phys. Rev. C 83, 045501 (2011).
  10. R. Abdul Khalek et al., Science requirements and detector concepts for the electron-ion collider: EIC yellow report, Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022).
  11. T. Klest, Charged-current elastic neutrino cross section measurement at the electron-ion collider, Phys. Rev. D 113, 033002 (2026).
  12. G. Cowan, Statistical Data Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998).
  13. C. H. Llewellyn Smith, Neutrino reactions at accelerator energies, Phys. Rep. 3, 261 (1972).
  14. M. Tzanov et al. (NuTeV Collaboration), Precise measurement of neutrino and anti-neutrino differential cross sections, Phys. Rev. D 74, 012008 (2006).
  15. G. Onengut et al. (CHORUS Collaboration), Measurement of nucleon structure functions in neutrino scattering, Phys. Lett. B 632, 65 (2006).
  16. B. Bhattacharya, R. J. Hill, and G. Paz, Model-independent determination of the axial mass parameter in quasielastic neutrino-nucleon scattering, Phys. Rev. D 84, 073006 (2011).
  17. R. A. Smith and E. J. Moniz, Neutrino reactions on nuclear targets, Nucl. Phys. B43, 605 (1972); Nucl. Phys.101, 547(E) (1975).
  18. F. Akbar, M. Rafi Alam, M. Sajjad Athar, and S. K. Singh, Quasielastic production of polarized hyperons in antineutrino-nucleon reactions, Phys. Rev. D 96, 093001 (2017).
  19. A. Buckley, J. Ferrando, S. Lloyd, K. Nordström, B. Page, M. Rüfenacht, M. Schönherr, and G. Watt, LHAPDF6: Parton density access in the LHC precision era, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 132 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation