Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Strong CP phase and parity in the Hamiltonian formalism

Ravi Kuchimanchi*

  • *Contact author: raviparity@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 112, 075033 – Published 17 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bl6j-dt75

Abstract

We show using the Hamiltonian formalism that if parity is a good symmetry of QCD, then the strong CP phase θ¯ must be 0 or π. We find that for P to be a physical symmetry, it must leave the Hilbert space Hθ associated with the θ-vacuum invariant (P:  Hθ→Hθ), which is possible only for θ=0 or π. We also show that forming linear combinations of states from different θ sectors produces only classical statistical mixtures, consistent with superselection rules, confirming that Hθ is the most general Hilbert space for the quantum theory. Furthermore, we demonstrate that requiring [P,Ω]=0—where Ω is the generator of large gauge transformations—independently enforces θ¯=0 (mod π), and that for complex quark mass matrix M, if a generalized parity operator P is a symmetry, then the value of θ gets determined so that it exactly cancels ArgDetM, again giving θ¯=0 (mod  π). These results establish the equivalence of the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian approaches to the strong CP problem.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Corrections

9 December, 2025

Correction: The first sentence in Sec. V was incomplete and has been fixed.

Article Text

References (30)

  1. A. Belavin, A. Polyakov, A. Schwartz, and Y. Tyupkin, Pseudoparticle solutions of the Yang-Mills equations, Phys. Lett. 59B, 85 (1975).
  2. R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Vacuum periodicity in a Yang-Mills quantum theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 172 (1976).
  3. C. Callan, R. Dashen, and D. Gross, The structure of the gauge theory vacuum, Phys. Lett. 63B, 334 (1976).
  4. R. Jackiw, Introduction to the Yang-Mills quantum theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 661 (1980).
  5. C. Abel et al., Measurement of the permanent electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 081803 (2020).
  6. R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977).
  7. S. Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978).
  8. F. Wilczek, Problem of strong P and T invariance in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978).
  9. A. Nelson, Naturally weak CP violation, Phys. Lett. 136B, 387 (1984).
  10. S. M. Barr, Solving the strong cp problem without the Peccei-Quinn symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 329 (1984).
  11. K. S. Babu and R. N. Mohapatra, Solution to the strong CP problem without an axion, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1286 (1990).
  12. R. Kuchimanchi, P/CP conserving CP/P violation solves strong CP problem, Phys. Rev. D 82, 116008 (2010).
  13. Q. Bonnefoy, L. Hall, C. A. Manzari, and C. Scherb, A colorful mirror solution to the strong cp problem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 221802 (2023).
  14. D. E. Kaplan, T. Melia, and S. Rajendran, What can solve the strong CP problem?, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 050.
  15. R. Kuchimanchi, Parity solves the strong CP problem, arXiv:2506.01911.
  16. M. Shifman, Instantons, in Advanced Topics in Quantum Field Theory: A Lecture Course (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2012), p. 178.
  17. G. Gabadadze and M. Shifman, QCD vacuum and axions: What’s happening?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 17, 3689 (2002).
  18. C. Gómez, Gravity, superselection rules and axions, Fortschr. Phys. 69, 2000095 (2021).
  19. G. C. Wick, A. S. Wightman, and E. P. Wigner, The intrinsic parity of elementary particles, Phys. Rev. 88, 101 (1952).
  20. A. S. Wightman, Superselection rules; old and new, Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971–1996) 110, 751 (1995).
  21. D. Giulini, Superselection rules, in Compendium of Quantum Physics, edited by D. Greenberger, K. Hentschel, and F. Weinert (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009), p. 771779.
  22. D. Tong, Lectures on gauge theory, https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/gaugetheory.html (2000).
  23. J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Lepton number as the fourth “color”, Phys. Rev. D 10, 275 (1974); R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati, Left-right gauge symmetry and an “isoconjugate” model of cp violation, 11, 566 (1975); G. Senjanovic and R. N. Mohapatra, Exact left-right symmetry and spontaneous violation of parity, 12, 1502 (1975).
  24. N. G. Deshpande, J. F. Gunion, B. Kayser, and F. Olness, Left-right-symmetric electroweak models with triplet Higgs field, Phys. Rev. D 44, 837 (1991).
  25. P. Duka, J. Gluza, and M. Zralek, Quantization and renormalization of the manifest left- right symmetric model of electroweak interactions, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 280, 336 (2000).
  26. R. Kuchimanchi, Leptonic CP problem in left-right symmetric model, Phys. Rev. D 91, 071901(R) (2015).
  27. R. Kuchimanchi, P stabilizes dark matter and with CP can predict leptonic phases, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 1 (2014).
  28. R. Kuchimanchi, P and CP solution of the strong CP puzzle, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095023 (2023).
  29. I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, Nufit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 216.
  30. L. Vecchi, When CP requires θ¯=0 not θ¯=π, arXiv:2507.10680.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation