Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Observation of a low energy nuclear recoil peak in the neutron calibration data of an Al2O3 crystal in CRESST-III

G. Angloher1, F. Casadei1, E. Cipelli1, L. Canonica1, F. Dominsky1, D. Hauff1, A. Langenkämper1, M. Mancuso1, B. Mauri1 et al. (CRESST Collaboration)

B. Mauri1, C. Moore1, F. Petricca1, F. Pröbst1, K. Schäffner1, M. Stahlberg1, L. Stodolsky1, M. Zanirato1, A. Bento1,2, S. Di Lorenzo1,3, D. Fuchs1,4,5,*, P. V. Guillaumon1,6, V. Zema1,4, J. Burkhart4,†, S. Fichtinger4, V. M. Ghete4, H. Kluck4,‡, V. Mokina4, S. Banik4,5,§, L. Einfalt4,5, F. Reindl4,5, J. Schieck4,5, C. Schwertner4,5, D. Valdenaire4,5, A. Bertolini7, L. Burmeister7, E. Fascione7, P. Murali7, B. von Krosigk7,8, R. Breier9, M. Ješkovský9, P. Povinec9, C. Bucci3, P. Gorla3, M. Olmi3, F. Pucci3, C. Pagliarone3,10, L. Pattavina3,11, J. Dohm12, J. Jochum12, C. Strandhagen12, I. Usherov12, F. v. Feilitzsch, M. Kaznacheeva13, T. Ortmann13, W. Potzel13, J. Rothe13, S. Schönert13, R. Strauss13, A. Erb13,14, H. Kraus15, M. Macko16, and V. Palušovà16,17 (CRESST Collaboration)

  • 1Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, 85748 Garching, Germany
  • 2Also at: LIBPhys, Departamento de Fisica, Universidade de Coimbra, P3004 516 Coimbra, Portugal
  • 3INFN, Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67010 Assergi, Italy
  • 4Marietta Blau Institute for Particle Physics, 1010 Vienna, Austria
  • 5Atominstitut, Technische Universität Wien, 1020 Wien, Austria
  • 6Also at: Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil
  • 7Kirchhoff-Institute for Physics, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
  • 8Institute for Astroparticle Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 9Comenius University, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, 84248 Bratislava, Slovakia
  • 10Also at: Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Meccanica, Università degli Studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale, 03043 Cassino, Italy
  • 11Also at: Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano Bicocca, Milano, 20126, Italy
  • 12Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
  • 13Physik-Department, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technische Universität München, D-85747 Garching, Germany
  • 14Also at: Walther-Meißner-Institut für Tieftemperaturforschung, 85748 Garching, Germany
  • 15Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom
  • 16IEAP, Czech Technical University in Prague, CZ-11000 Prague, Czech Republic
  • 17Present address: Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Institut für Physik, 55128 Mainz, Germany

  • *Contact author: dominik.fuchs@oeaw.ac.at
  • †Contact author: jens.burkhart@oeaw.ac.at
  • ‡Contact author: holger.kluck@oeaw.ac.at
  • §Contact author: samir.banik@oeaw.ac.at

Phys. Rev. D 112, 102008 – Published 26 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bb31-pgzg

Abstract

The current generation of cryogenic solid state detectors used in direct dark matter and CEνNS searches typically reach energy thresholds of O(10)  eV for nuclear recoils. For a reliable calibration in this energy regime a method has been proposed, providing monoenergetic nuclear recoils at low energies ∼100  eV–1  keV. In this work we report on the observation of a peak at (1113.6−6.5+6.5) eV in the data of an Al2O3 crystal in CRESST-III, which was irradiated with neutrons from an AmBe calibration source. We attribute this monoenergetic peak to the radiative capture of thermal neutrons on Al27 and the subsequent deexcitation via single γ emission. We compare the measured results with the outcome of Geant4 simulations and investigate the possibility to make use of this effect for the energy calibration of Al2O3 detectors at low energies. We further investigate the possibility of a shift in the expected energy scale of this effect caused by the creation of defects in the target crystal.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (53)

  1. R. Strauss et al., Gram-scale cryogenic calorimeters for rare-event searches, Phys. Rev. D 96, 022009 (2017).
  2. A. H. Abdelhameed et al. (CRESST Collaboration), First results from the CRESST-III low-mass dark matter program, Phys. Rev. D 100, 102002 (2019).
  3. G. Angloher et al. (CRESST Collaboration), Light dark matter search using a diamond cryogenic detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 324 (2024).
  4. E. Armengaud et al. (EDELWEISS Collaboration), Searching for low-mass dark matter particles with a massive Ge bolometer operated above ground, Phys. Rev. D 99, 082003 (2019).
  5. E. Armengaud et al. (EDELWEISS Collaboration), Search for sub-GeV dark matter via the Migdal effect with an EDELWEISS germanium detector with NbSi transition-edge sensors, Phys. Rev. D 106, 062004 (2022).
  6. I. Alkhatib et al. (SuperCDMS Collaboration), Light dark matter search with a high-resolution athermal phonon detector operated above ground, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 061801 (2021).
  7. R. Agnese et al. (SuperCDMS Collaboration), First dark matter constraints from a SuperCDMS single-charge sensitive detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 051301 (2018).
  8. M. F. Albakry et al. (SuperCDMS Collaboration), Investigating the sources of low-energy events in a SuperCDMS-HVeV detector, Phys. Rev. D 105, 112006 (2022).
  9. G. Angloher et al. (CRESST Collaboration), Results on sub-GeV dark matter from a 10 eV threshold CRESST-III silicon detector, Phys. Rev. D 107, 122003 (2023).
  10. G. Angloher et al. (CRESST Collaboration), First observation of single photons in a CRESST detector and new dark matter exclusion limits, Phys. Rev. D 110, 083038 (2024).
  11. F. Kadribasic et al., Crystal defects: A portal to dark matter detection, arXiv:2002.03525.
  12. M. Heikinheimo, S. Sassi, K. Nordlund, K. Tuominen, and N. Mirabolfathi, Identification of the low-energy excess in dark matter searches with crystal defects, Phys. Rev. D 106, 083009 (2022).
  13. S. Sassi, M. Heikinheimo, K. Tuominen, A. Kuronen, J. Byggmästar, K. Nordlund, and N. Mirabolfathi, Energy loss in low energy nuclear recoils in dark matter detector materials, Phys. Rev. D 106, 063012 (2022).
  14. G. Soum-Sidikov, J.-P. Crocombette, M.-C. Marinica, C. Doutre, D. Lhuillier, and L. Thulliez, Calculation of crystal defects induced in CaWO4 cryogenic detector by 100 eV displacement cascades using a data driven force field, Phys. Rev. D 111, 085021 (2025).
  15. K. Nordlund, F. Kong, F. Djurabekova, M. Heikinheimo, K. Tuominen, and N. Mirabolfathi, Spontaneous damage annealing reactions as a possible source of low energy excess in semiconductor detectors, arXiv:2408.07518.
  16. V. Wagner (CRAB Collaboration), Spontaneous damage annealing reactions as a possible source of low energy excess in semiconductor detectors, J. Low Temp. Phys. 209, 1055 (2022).
  17. L. Thulliez et al., Calibration of nuclear recoils at the 100 eV scale using neutron capture, J. Instrum. 16, P07032 (2021).
  18. H. Abele et al. (CRAB Collaboration and NUCLEUS Collaboration), Observation of a nuclear recoil peak at the 100 eV scale induced by neutron capture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 211802 (2023).
  19. G. Angloher et al. (CRESST Collaboration), Observation of a low energy nuclear recoil peak in the neutron calibration data of the CRESST-III experiment, Phys. Rev. D 108, 022005 (2023).
  20. R. Agnese et al. (SuperCDMS Collaboration), Energy loss due to defect formation from Pb206 recoils in SuperCDMS germanium detectors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 092101 (2018).
  21. P. Adari et al., EXCESS workshop: Descriptions of rising low-energy spectra, SciPost Phys. Proc. 9, 001 (2022).
  22. D. Baxter, R. Essig, Y. Hochberg, M. Kaznacheeva, B. von Krosigk, F. Reindl, R. K. Romani, and F. Wagner, Low-energy backgrounds in solid-state phonon and charge detectors, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 75, 301 (2025).
  23. G. Angloher et al., Latest observations on the low energy excess in CRESST-III, SciPost Phys. Proc. 12, 013 (2023).
  24. A. N. Villano, M. Fritts, N. Mast, S. Brown, P. Cushman, K. Harris, and V. Mandic, First observation of isolated nuclear recoils following neutron capture for dark matter calibration, Phys. Rev. D 105, 083014 (2022).
  25. R. Firestone et al., EGAF: Measurement and analysis of gamma-ray cross sections, Nucl. Data Sheets 119, 79 (2014).
  26. D. Brown et al., ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th major release of the nuclear reaction data library with CIELO-project cross sections new standards and thermal scattering data, Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 1 (2018).
  27. M. Shamsuzzoha Basunia, Nuclear data sheets for A = 28, Nucl. Data Sheets 114, 1189 (2013).
  28. S. Di Lorenzo, Multiple detector analysis in the CRESST dark matter experiment, Ph.D. thesis, Gran Sasso Science Institute, 2020.
  29. G. Angloher, M. Bauer, I. Bavykina, A. Bento, A. Brown, C. Bucci, C. Ciemniak, C. Coppi, G. Deuter, and F. von Feilitzsch (CRESST Collaboration), Commissioning run of the CRESST-II dark matter search, Astropart. Phys. 31, 270 (2009).
  30. G. Angloher et al. (CRESST Collaboration), Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II dark matter search, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1971 (2012).
  31. A. H. Abdelhameed et al. (CRESST Collaboration), GEANT4-based electromagnetic background model for the CRESST dark matter experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 881 (2019); 79, 987(E) (2019).
  32. S. Agostinelli et al. (GEANT4), GEANT4—A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
  33. J. Allison et al., GEANT4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006).
  34. J. Allison et al., Recent developments in GEANT4, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 835, 186 (2016).
  35. A. Fuß, Simulation based neutron background studies for the CRESST and COSINUS dark matter search experiments, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Wien, 2022.
  36. L. Thulliez, H. Kluck, and A. Bonhomme, Fifrelin4Geant4 (2023).
  37. G. Soum-Sidikov, L. Thulliez, O. Litaize, A. Chalil, J.-P. Crocombette, and D. Lhuillier (CRAB Collaboration), Fifradina dataset for radiative thermal neutron-capture processes in cryogenic detectors (2023).
  38. G. Soum-Sidikov et al. (CRAB Collaboration), Study of collision and γ-cascade times following neutron-capture processes in cryogenic detectors, Phys. Rev. D 108, 072009 (2023).
  39. O. Litaize, O. Serot, and L. Berge, Fission modelling with FIFRELIN, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 177 (2015).
  40. C. Borschel and C. Ronning, Ion beam irradiation of nanostructures—A 3D Monte Carlo simulation code, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 269, 2133 (2011).
  41. A. P. Thompson et al., LAMMPS—A flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
  42. P. Vashishta, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, and J. P. Rino, Interaction potentials for alumina and molecular dynamics simulations of amorphous and liquid alumina, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 083504 (2008); 105, 059901(E) (2009).
  43. J. Lewis, D. Schwarzenbach, and H. D. Flack, Electric field gradients and charge density in corundum, α−Al2O3, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 38, 733 (1982).
  44. H. Dammak, Y. Chalopin, M. Laroche, M. Hayoun, and J.-J. Greffet, Quantum thermal bath for molecular dynamics simulation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 190601 (2009).
  45. J.-L. Barrat and D. Rodney, Portable implementation of a quantum thermal bath for molecular dynamics simulations, J. Stat. Phys. 144, 679 (2011).
  46. D. R. Fuchs, New analysis methods for enhanced sensitivity to light dark matter at CRESST-III and studies of discovery potential for next generation cryogenic experiments, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, 2023.
  47. N. F. Iachellini, Increasing the sensitivity to low mass dark matter in CRESST-III with a new DAQ and signal processing, Ph.D. thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 2019.
  48. E. Gatti and P. F. Manfredi, Processing the signals from solid-state detectors in elementary-particle physics, Riv. Nuovo Cimento (1978–1999) 9, 1 (1986).
  49. M. Mancuso, A. Bento, N. Ferreiro Iachellini, D. Hauff, F. Petricca, F. Pröbst, J. Rothe, and R. Strauss, A method to define the energy threshold depending on noise level for rare event searches, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 940, 492 (2019).
  50. F. Pröbst, M. Frank, S. Cooper, P. Colling, D. Dummer, P. Ferger, G. Forster, A. Nucciotti, W. Seidel, and L. Stodolsky, Model for cryogenic particle detectors with superconducting phase transition thermometers, J. Low Temp. Phys. 100, 69 (1995).
  51. Update of X Ray and Gamma Ray Decay Data Standards for Detector Calibration and Other Applications, Non-Serial Publications (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2007).
  52. H. Abele et al., Sub-keV electron recoil calibration for macroscopic cryogenic calorimeters using a novel x-ray fluorescence source, J. Low Temp. Phys. 221, 265 (2025).
  53. H. Abele et al., The CRAB facility at the TU Wien TRIGA reactor: Status and related physics program, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1188 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation