- Letter
- Open Access
Cosmological signatures of neutrino seesaw mechanism
Phys. Rev. D 112, L081309 – Published 31 October, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/b7hv-3h2p
Abstract
The tiny neutrino masses are most naturally explained by seesaw mechanism through singlet right-handed neutrinos, which can further explain the matter-antimatter asymmetry in the Universe. In this work, we propose a new approach to study cosmological signatures of neutrino seesaw through the interaction between inflaton and right-handed neutrinos, which respects the shift symmetry. In our framework, after inflation the inflaton predominantly decays into right-handed neutrinos and its decay rate is modulated by the fluctuations of the Higgs field, which act as the source of curvature perturbations. This gives a new realization of Higgs modulated reheating, and it produces primordial non-Gaussian signatures that can be measured by the forthcoming large-scale structure surveys. We demonstrate, for the first time, that the measurements of non-Gaussianity by these surveys can probe the neutrino seesaw scale and have the potential to constrain a large portion of the seesaw parameter space, opening up a new window for directly testing the high-scale seesaw mechanism.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
See Also
Cosmological non-Gaussianity from the neutrino seesaw mechanism
Article Text
References (62)
- P. Minkowski, at a rate of one out of muon decays?, Phys. Lett. 67B, 421 (1977).
- M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Complex spinors and unified theories, Conf. Proc. C 790927, 315 (1979), https://inspirehep.net/literature/9686; T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, 7902131, 95 (1979), https://inspirehep.net/literature/143150; S. L. Glashow, The future of elementary particle physics, NATO Sci. Ser. B 61, 687 (1980); R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980); J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrino masses in theories, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2227 (1980).
- M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Baryogenesis without grand unification, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986).
- J. M. Maldacena, Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2003) 013.
- For reviews, X. Chen, Primordial non-Gaussianities from inflation models, Adv. Astron. 2010, 638979 (2010); P. D. Meerburg et al., Primordial non-Gaussianity, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 107 (2019), https://inspirehep.net/literature/1724542.
- Y. Akrami et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 Results IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A9 (2020).
- J. B. Munoz, Y. Ali-Haimoud, and M. Kamionkowski, Primordial non-gaussianity from the bispectrum of 21-cm fluctuations in the dark ages, Phys. Rev. D 92, 083508 (2015).
- P. D. Meerburg, M. Munchmeyer, J. B. Munoz, and X. Chen, Prospects for cosmological collider physics, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2017) 050.
- G. Dvali, A. Gruzinov, and M. Zaldarriaga, A new mechanism for generating density perturbations from inflation, Phys. Rev. D 69, 023505 (2004).
- A. Starobinsky, Dynamics of phase transition in the new inflationary universe scenario and generation of perturbations, Phys. Lett. 117B, 175 (1982).
- A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, Equilibrium state of a self-interacting scalar field in the de Sitter background, Phys. Rev. D 50, 6357 (1994).
- S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Top quark, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
Adding additional light scalar particle(s) to the Higgs sector at weak scale could lift the Higgs self-coupling to the level of at the inflation scale [14]. For the current study we will just adopt the minimal SM Higgs sector.
- H.-J. He and Z.-Z. Xianyu, Extending Higgs inflation with TeV scale new physics, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2014) 019.
- J. You, L. Song, H.-J. He, and C. Han, companion paper, Cosmological non-Gaussianity from the neutrino seesaw mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083555 (2025).
- S. Lu, Y. Wang, and Z. Z. Xianyu, A cosmological Higgs collider, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 011.
An approximate shift symmetry plays a vital role for ensuring flatness of the inflaton potential during inflation, which holds for many inflation models such as the natural inflation [18] and axion monodromy inflation [19, 20], or other models with inflation driven by pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone bosons.
- K. Freese, J. A. Frieman, and A. V. Olinto, Natural inflation with pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3233 (1990).
- E. Silverstein and A. Westphal, Monodromy in the CMB: Gravity waves and string inflation, Phys. Rev. D 78, 106003 (2008).
- L. McAllister, E. Silverstein, and A. Westphal, Gravity waves and linear inflation from axion monodromy, Phys. Rev. D 82, 046003 (2010).
As an illustration, this dimension-5 operator in Eq. (8) may be induced from a UV model having an approximate global symmetry which is spontaneously broken by a new scalar field with a charge and having a vacuum expectation value (VEV), . After spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB), the Yukawa interaction will generate a Majorana mass for the right-handed neutrino , where for a natural Yukawa coupling . The inflaton emerges as a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson from and has its mass generated by soft breaking of the symmetry, and its interactions with fermions are dictated by their U(1) charges. The residual shift symmetry enforces that the inflaton-fermion coupling (such as the coupling) takes the form of a dimension-5 operator. Its cutoff scale is given by the breaking scale , which is about a factor of of the mass scale as shown above since the mass originates from the SSB of .
In Ref. [23], the authors introduced a dimension-4 coupling between inflaton () and right-handed neutrino (), which generates the Majorana mass term for . They made an assumption that the Dirac mass with negligible Majorana mass of the right-handed neutrino. In this way, the inflaton decay is kinematically blocked if the inflaton mass is smaller than twice the Dirac mass. Once the Higgs vacuum expectation value decreases below a certain threshold, the inflaton can decay. This is a different scenario of Higgs modulated reheating and the resultant NG originates from this blocking effect. This scenario assumed negligible Majorana mass of and did not test high scale seesaw. Besides, the dimension-4 coupling between inflaton and has to be generally suppressed to keep the flatness of inflaton potential (which is realized by imposing an approximate shift symmetry in our framework), so our dimension-5 coupling in Eq. (8) plays the major role for inflaton decay. Hence, our present work has proposed a new scenario of Higgs modulated reheating and can test the high scale seesaw mechanism, which would be complementary to the case of Ref. [23].
- A. Karam, T. Markkanen, L. Marzola, S. Nurmi, M. Raidal, and A. Rajantie, Novel mechanism for primordial perturbations in minimal extensions of the standard model, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 153.
- Nima Arkani-Hamed and Juan Maldacena, Cosmological collider physics, arXiv:1503.08043.
- X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, Neutrino signatures in primordial non-Gaussianities, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 022.
- A. Hook, J. Huang, and D. Racco, Searches for other vacua. Part II. A new Higgstory at the cosmological collider, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 105.
- A. A. Starobinsky, Dynamics of phase transition in the new inflationary universe scenario and generation of perturbations, Phys. Lett. 117B, 175 (1982).
- D. S. Salopek and J. R. Bond, nonlinear evolution of long wavelength metric fluctuations in inflationary models, Phys. Rev. D 42, 3936 (1990).
- G. L. Comer, N. Deruelle, D. Langlois, and J. Parry, Growth or decay of cosmological inhomogeneities as a function of their equation of state, Phys. Rev. D 49, 2759 (1994).
- M. Sasaki and E. D. Stewart, A general analytic formula for the spectral index of the density perturbations produced during inflation, Prog. Theor. Phys. 95, 71 (1996).
- M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka, Superhorizon scale dynamics of multiscalar inflation, Prog. Theor. Phys. 99, 763 (1998).
- D. Wands, K. A. Malik, D. H. Lyth, and A. R. Liddle, A New approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales, Phys. Rev. D 62, 043527 (2000).
- D. H. Lyth and D. Wands, Conserved cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 68, 103515 (2003).
- G. I. Rigopoulos and E. P. S. Shellard, The separate universe approach and the evolution of nonlinear superhorizon cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 68, 123518 (2003).
- D. H. Lyth, K. A. Malik, and M. Sasaki, A general proof of the conservation of the curvature perturbation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2005) 004.
Here is the physical time at the end of inflation, is the physical time at which reheating occurs, is a reference energy density and is the reference time where the energy density after the completion of reheating.
- N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A1 (2020).
- N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
- D. Wands, Local non-Gaussianity from inflation, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 124002 (2010).
- K. Ichikawa, T. Suyama, T. Takahashi, and M. Yamaguchi, Primordial curvature fluctuation and its non-Gaussianity in models with modulated reheating, Phys. Rev. D 78, 063545 (2008).
- A. De Simone, H. Perrier, and A. Riotto, Non-Gaussianities from the standard model Higgs, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2013) 037.
- A. Karam, T. Markkanen, L. Marzola, S. Nurmi, M. Raidal, and A. Rajantie, Higgs-like spectator field as the origin of structure, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 620 (2021).
- A. Litsa, K. Freese, E. I. Sfakianakis, P. Stengel, and L. Visinelli, Primordial non-Gaussianity from the effects of the standard model Higgs during reheating after inflation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2023) 033.
- T. Suyama and S. Yokoyama, Statistics of general functions of a Gaussian field-application to non-Gaussianity from preheating, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2013) 018.
- S. Weinberg, Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations, Phys. Rev. D 72, 043514 (2005); Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations II. Can these corrections become large?, 74, 023508 (2006).
- X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z. Z. Xianyu, Schwinger-Keldysh diagrammatics for primordial perturbations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2017) 006.
Here is defined as the 3-point correlation function without momentum delta function: .
These inputs correspond to the light neutrino mass at the low-energy electroweak scale. The value of at the seesaw scale or Hubble scale is connected to its low energy value via renormalization-group (RG) running and is enlarged by about 30% relative to its low energy value [49, 50]. The RG running effects are included in our present analysis.
- S. Antusch, J. Kersten, M. Lindner, and M. Ratz, Running neutrino masses, mixings and phases: Analytical results and phenomenological consequences, Nucl. Phys. B674, 401 (2003).
- H.-J. He and F.-R. Yin, Common origin of and breaking in neutrino seesaw, baryon asymmetry, and hidden flavor symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 84, 033009 (2011); S.-F. Ge, H.-J. He, and F.-R. Yin, Common origin of soft and breaking in neutrino seesaw and the origin of matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2010) 017.
- I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 216.
- S. Alam et al. (eBOSS Collaboration), Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache point observatory, Phys. Rev. D 103, 083533 (2021).
- T. M. C. Abbott et al. (DES Collaboration), Dark Energy Survey year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing, Phys. Rev. D 105, 023520 (2022).
- F. An et al. (JUNO Collaboration), Neutrino physics with JUNO, J. Phys. G 43, 030401 (2016).
- R. Acciarri et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) and Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE): Conceptual design report, Volume 1: The LBNF and DUNE projects, arXiv:1601.05471.
- H.-J. He, J. Ren, and W. Yao, Probing new physics of cubic Higgs interaction via Higgs pair production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 93, 015003 (2016); J. Ren, R.-Q. Xiao, M. Zhou, Y. Fang, H.-J. He, and W. Yao, LHC search of new Higgs boson via resonant di-Higgs production with decays into 4W, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 090; L. C. Lü, C. Du, Y. Fang, H.-J. He, and H. Zhang, Searching heavier Higgs boson via di-Higgs production at LHC Run-2, Phys. Lett. B 755, 509 (2016).
- A. Aghamousa et al. (DESI Collaboration), The DESI experiment part I: Science, targeting, and survey design, arXiv:1611.00036.
- K. Abazajian et al. (CMB-S4 Collaboration), CMB-S4 science case, reference design, and project plan, arXiv:1907.04473.
- L. Amendola et al. (Euclid Collaboration), Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite, Living Rev. Relativity 21, 2 (2018).
- O. Dore et al. (SPHEREx Collaboration), Cosmology with the SPHEREX all-sky spectral survey, arXiv:1412.4872.
- R. Acciarri et al. (LSST Science Collaboration), LSST Science book, Version 2.0, arXiv:0912.0201.
- A. Weltman et al., Fundamental physics with the square kilometre array, Pub. Astron. Soc. Aust. 37, e002 (2020).