Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Varieties of electrically charged physical states in SU(2)×U(1) lattice gauge Higgs theory

Jeff Greensite

Phys. Rev. D 114, 034514 – Published 18 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/b6vw-gxg5

Abstract

We consider a quenched SU(2)×U(1) gauge Higgs theory on the lattice, coupled to a static vectorlike fermion which, in this case, is in the same gauge group representation as the Higgs field. Physical (i.e., locally gauge invariant) electrically charged and electrically neutral states of matter particles in the electroweak theory were described decades ago, but those constructions do not exhaust all the possibilities, and new types of electrically charged/neutral states, orthogonal to former constructions, are described here. The difference has to do with how the static source, which by itself does not create a physical state, is dressed by dynamical fields. We find that, unsurprisingly, the neutral static fermion is much lighter than any of the charged fermion states. But a lattice study of the propagation of the charged fermion states indicates the existence of (at least) two particle states with different masses in charged particle spectrum.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (39)

  1. Gerard ’t Hooft, Which topological features of a gauge theory can be responsible for permanent confinement? NATO Sci. Ser. B 59, 117 (1980).
  2. Tom Banks and Eliezer Rabinovici, Finite temperature behavior of the lattice Abelian Higgs model, Nucl. Phys. B160, 349 (1979).
  3. J. Frohlich, G. Morchio, and F. Strocchi, Higgs phenomenon without symmetry breaking order parameter, Nucl. Phys. B190, 553 (1981).
  4. Jannis Herr, Carolin Schlosser, and Marc Wagner, Gluelump masses and mass splittings from SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 109, 034516 (2024).
  5. Peng Guo, Adam P. Szczepaniak, Giuseppe Galata, Andrea Vassallo, and Elena Santopinto, Gluelump spectrum from Coulomb gauge QCD, Phys. Rev. D 77, 056005 (2008).
  6. V. Bornyakov, G. Schierholz, and T. Streuer, Glueball and gluelump spectrum in Abelian projected QCD, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 106-107, 676 (2002).
  7. David B. Kaplan and Srimoyee Sen, Regulated chiral gauge theory and the strong CP problem, arXiv:2412.02024.
  8. Ryan Thorngren, John Preskill, and Lukasz Fidkowski, Chiral lattice gauge theories from symmetry disentanglers, arXiv:2601.04304.
  9. S. Elitzur, Impossibility of spontaneously breaking local symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 12, 3978 (1975).
  10. Jeff Greensite and Kazue Matsuyama, Higgs phase as a spin glass and the transition between varieties of confinement, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054508 (2020).
  11. Jeff Greensite and Kazue Matsuyama, Symmetry confinement, and the Higgs phase, Symmetry 14, 177 (2022).
  12. Paul A. M. Dirac, Gauge invariant formulation of quantum electrodynamics, Can. J. Phys. 33, 650 (1955).
  13. Robert E. Shrock, The phase structure of SU(2) X U(1)-y lattice gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B267, 301 (1986).
  14. M. A. Zubkov and A. I. Veselov, Upper bound on the cutoff in lattice electroweak theory, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2008) 109.
  15. Jeroen C. Vink and Uwe-Jens Wiese, Gauge fixing on the lattice without ambiguity, Phys. Lett. B 289, 122 (1992).
  16. L. Ravera, Lecture notes on symmetry reduction via the dressing field method, arXiv:2603.29505.
  17. Jeff Greensite and Hou Y. Yau, Separation-of-charge confinement and the Higgs transition in SU(3) gauge-Higgs theory, Phys. Rev. D 109, 034502 (2024).
  18. Axel Maas, Brout-Englert-Higgs physics: From foundations to phenomenology, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 106, 132 (2019).
  19. Martin Luscher and Ulli Wolff, How to calculate the elastic scattering matrix in two-dimensional quantum field theories by numerical simulation, Nucl. Phys. B339, 222 (1990).
  20. Benoit Blossier, Michele Della Morte, Georg von Hippel, Tereza Mendes, and Rainer Sommer, On the generalized eigenvalue method for energies and matrix elements in lattice field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 094.
  21. Shivam Gangwani, Jeff Greensite, and Anass Oualla, Aspects of the Higgs phase in SU(2)×U(1) lattice gauge Higgs theory, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054504 (2024).
  22. Richard B. Lehoucq, Danny C. Sorensen, and Chao Yang, arpack Users’ Guide: Solution of Large-Scale Eigenvalue Problems with Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Methods (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, USA, 1998).
  23. Jeff Greensite, Excitations of elementary fermions in gauge Higgs theories, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054504 (2020).
  24. Kazue Matsuyama, Excitations of isolated static charges in the charge q=2 abelian Higgs model, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074508 (2021).
  25. Jeff Greensite and Kazue Matsuyama, Quantum excitations of static charges in the Ginzburg-Landau model of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174508 (2022).
  26. Sofie Martins, Patrick Jenny, Axel Maas, and Georg Wieland, Weak and Higgs physics from the lattice, arXiv:2603.12882.
  27. Axel Maas, René Sondenheimer, and Pascal Törek, On the observable spectrum of theories with a Brout–Englert–Higgs effect, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 402, 18 (2019).
  28. J. Greensite, Supporting data and code, https://sfsu.app.box.com/folder/403319562048?s=81bshtprtbwwtb4e9uifmhyi2prz9m0l.
  29. S. F. Edwards and P. W Anderson, Theory of spin glasses, J. Phys. F 5, 965 (1975).
  30. David Ward, Higgs phase as a spin glass phase in D=5 dimensional SU(2) gauge-Higgs theory, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034516 (2022).
  31. B. Allés, O. Borisenko, and A. Papa, Confinement-Higgs and deconfinement-Higgs transitions in four-dimensional SU(2) LGT at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 112, 094509 (2025).
  32. B. Allés, O. Borisenko, and A. Papa, Confinement-Higgs and deconfinement-Higgs transitions in three-dimensional Z(2) LGT, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014509 (2025).
  33. Jeff Greensite and Kazue Matsuyama, Confinement criterion for gauge theories with matter fields, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094510 (2017).
  34. Ruben Verresen, Umberto Borla, Ashvin Vishwanath, Sergej Moroz, and Ryan Thorngren, Higgs condensates are symmetry-protected topological phases: I. Discrete symmetries, arXiv:2211.01376.
  35. Ryan Thorngren, Tibor Rakovszky, Ruben Verresen, and Ashvin Vishwanath, Higgs condensates are symmetry-protected topological phases: II. U(1) Gauge theory and superconductors, arXiv:2303.08136.
  36. Kristian Tyn Kai Chung, Rafael Flores-Calderón, Rafael C. Torres, Pedro Ribeiro, Sergej Moroz, and Paul A. McClarty, Higgs phases and boundary criticality, SciPost Phys. 19, 105 (2025).
  37. K. Osterwalder and E. Seiler, Gauge field theories on the lattice, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 110, 440 (1978).
  38. Eduardo H. Fradkin and Stephen H. Shenker, Phase diagrams of lattice gauge theories with Higgs fields, Phys. Rev. D 19, 3682 (1979).
  39. J Kertesz, Existence of weak singularities when going around the liquid-gas critical point, Physica A (Amsterdam) 161, 58 (1989).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation