Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Selection rules for charged lepton flavor violating processes from residual flavor groups

Lorenzo Calibbi1,*, Claudia Hagedorn2,†, Michael A. Schmidt3,‡, and James Vandeleur3,§

  • *Contact author: calibbi@nankai.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: claudia.hagedorn@ific.uv.es
  • ‡Contact author: m.schmidt@unsw.edu.au
  • §Contact author: james.vandeleur@unsw.edu.au

Phys. Rev. D 112, 075031 – Published 17 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/b6gz-c1c9

Abstract

We systematically investigate the possible phenomenological impact of residual flavor groups in the charged lepton sector. We consider all possible flavor charge assignments for Abelian residual symmetries up to Z8. The allowed flavor structures of operators in Standard Model effective field theory (up to dimension six) lead to distinctive and observable patterns of charged lepton flavor violating processes. We illustrate the relevance of such selection rules displaying the current bounds on and the future sensitivities to the new physics scale. These results demonstrate, in particular, the importance and discriminating power of searches for lepton flavor violating τ lepton decays and muonium to antimuonium conversion.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (93)

  1. S. F. King, Models of neutrino mass, mixing and CP violation, J. Phys. G 42, 123001 (2015).
  2. F. Feruglio and A. Romanino, Lepton flavor symmetries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015007 (2021).
  3. Z.-z. Xing, Flavor structures of charged fermions and massive neutrinos, Phys. Rep. 854, 1 (2020).
  4. T. Kobayashi, H. Ohki, H. Okada, Y. Shimizu, and M. Tanimoto, An Introduction to Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetries for Particle Physicists Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 1 (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2022).
  5. W. Grimus and P. O. Ludl, Finite flavour groups of fermions, J. Phys. A 45, 233001 (2012).
  6. G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio, Tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing, A4 and the modular symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B741, 215 (2006).
  7. X.-G. He, Y.-Y. Keum, and R. R. Volkas, A4 flavor symmetry breaking scheme for understanding quark and neutrino mixing angles, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2006) 039.
  8. C. S. Lam, Determining horizontal symmetry from neutrino mixing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 121602 (2008).
  9. I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. a. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 216.
  10. Y. Lin, A predictive A4 model, Charged lepton hierarchy and tri-bimaximal sum rule, Nucl. Phys. B813, 91 (2009).
  11. Y. Shimizu, M. Tanimoto, and A. Watanabe, Breaking tri-bimaximal mixing and large θ13, Prog. Theor. Phys. 126, 81 (2011).
  12. S. F. King and C. Luhn, A4 models of tri-bimaximal-reactor mixing, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 036.
  13. I. de Medeiros Varzielas and D. Pidt, UV completions of flavour models and large θ13, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2013) 065.
  14. F. Feruglio, C. Hagedorn, Y. Lin, and L. Merlo, Lepton flavour violation in models with A4 flavour symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B809, 218 (2009).
  15. C. Csaki, C. Delaunay, C. Grojean, and Y. Grossman, A model of lepton masses from a warped extra dimension, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2008) 055.
  16. E. Ma, Quark and lepton flavor triality, Phys. Rev. D 82, 037301 (2010).
  17. Q.-H. Cao, A. Damanik, E. Ma, and D. Wegman, Probing lepton flavor triality with Higgs boson decay, Phys. Rev. D 83, 093012 (2011).
  18. C. Hagedorn and M. Serone, Leptons in holographic composite Higgs models with non-Abelian discrete symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2011) 083.
  19. M. Holthausen, M. Lindner, and M. A. Schmidt, Lepton flavor at the electroweak scale: A complete A4 model, Phys. Rev. D 87, 033006 (2013).
  20. S. Pascoli and Y.-L. Zhou, Flavon-induced connections between lepton flavour mixing and charged lepton flavour violation processes, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2016) 145.
  21. Y. Muramatsu, T. Nomura, and Y. Shimizu, Mass limit for light flavon with residual Z3 symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2016) 192.
  22. I. Bigaran, X.-G. He, M. A. Schmidt, G. Valencia, and R. Volkas, Lepton-flavor-violating tau decays from triality, Phys. Rev. D 107, 055001 (2023).
  23. G. Lichtenstein, M. A. Schmidt, G. Valencia, and R. R. Volkas, Complementarity of μTRISTAN and Belle II in searches for charged-lepton flavour violation, Phys. Lett. B 845, 138144 (2023).
  24. G. Lichtenstein, M. A. Schmidt, G. Valencia, and R. R. Volkas, Z and Higgs boson decays with doubly-charged scalars at one-loop: Current constraints, future sensitivities, and application to lepton-triality models, Nucl. Phys. B1013, 116850 (2025).
  25. L. Calibbi and G. Signorelli, Charged lepton flavour violation: An experimental and theoretical introduction, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 41, 71 (2018).
  26. M. Ardu and G. Pezzullo, Introduction to charged lepton flavor violation, Universe 8, 299 (2022).
  27. S. Davidson, B. Echenard, R. H. Bernstein, J. Heeck, and D. G. Hitlin, Charged lepton flavor violation, arXiv:2209.00142.
  28. G. Blankenburg, G. Isidori, and J. Jones-Perez, Neutrino masses and LFV from minimal breaking of U(3)5 and U(2)5 flavor symmetries, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2126 (2012).
  29. J. Jones-Pérez Split-family SUSY, U(2)5 flavour symmetry and neutrino physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2772 (2014); 74, 2886(E) (2014).
  30. J. Heeck, Interpretation of lepton flavor violation, Phys. Rev. D 95, 015022 (2017).
  31. J. Heeck and M. Sokhashvili, Lepton flavor violation by two units, Phys. Lett. B 852, 138621 (2024).
  32. A. Greljo, A. Palavrić, and A. E. Thomsen, Adding flavor to the SMEFT, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 010.
  33. A. Palavrić, Discrete leptonic flavor symmetries: UV mediators and phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 110, 115025 (2024).
  34. J. Heeck, M. Sokhashvili, and A. Thapa, Lepton flavor violation by three units, arXiv:2505.17178.
  35. W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621 (1986).
  36. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  37. B. Henning, X. Lu, and H. Murayama, How to use the standard model effective field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 023.
  38. I. Brivio and M. Trott, The standard model as an effective field theory, Phys. Rep. 793, 1 (2019).
  39. G. Isidori, F. Wilsch, and D. Wyler, The standard model effective field theory at work, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 015006 (2024).
  40. C. Luhn, S. Nasri, and P. Ramond, The flavor group Δ(3n2), J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 48, 073501 (2007).
  41. J. A. Escobar and C. Luhn, The flavor group Δ(6n2), J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 50, 013524 (2009).
  42. S. F. King, T. Neder, and A. J. Stuart, Lepton mixing predictions from Δ(6n2) family symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 726, 312 (2013).
  43. G.-J. Ding and S. F. King, Generalized CP and Δ(3n2) family symmetry for semi-direct predictions of the PMNS matrix, Phys. Rev. D 93, 025013 (2016).
  44. C. Hagedorn, A. Meroni, and E. Molinaro, Lepton mixing from Δ(3n2) and Δ(6n2) and CP, Nucl. Phys. B891, 499 (2015).
  45. G.-J. Ding, S. F. King, and T. Neder, Generalised CP and Δ(6n2) family symmetry in semi-direct models of leptons, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 007.
  46. R. de Adelhart Toorop, F. Feruglio, and C. Hagedorn, Finite modular groups and lepton mixing, Nucl. Phys. B858, 437 (2012).
  47. F. Feruglio and A. Paris, The Golden Ratio prediction for the solar angle from a natural model with A5 flavour symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2011) 101.
  48. A. Di Iura, C. Hagedorn, and D. Meloni, Lepton mixing from the interplay of the alternating group A5 and CP, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2015) 037.
  49. P. Ballett, S. Pascoli, and J. Turner, Mixing angle and phase correlations from A5 with generalized CP and their prospects for discovery, Phys. Rev. D 92, 093008 (2015).
  50. C.-C. Li and G.-J. Ding, Lepton mixing in A5 family symmetry and generalized CP, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2015) 100.
  51. C. Hagedorn, A. Meroni, and L. Vitale, Mixing patterns from the groups Σ(nφ), J. Phys. A 47, 055201 (2014).
  52. S. Weinberg, Baryon and lepton nonconserving processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1566 (1979).
  53. A. Crivellin, S. Najjari, and J. Rosiek, Lepton flavor violation in the standard model with general dimension-six operators, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 167.
  54. K. Afanaciev et al. (MEG II Collaboration), New limit on the μ+→e+γ decay with the MEG II experiment, arXiv:2504.15711.
  55. A. M. Baldini et al. (MEG II Collaboration), The search for μ+→e+γ with 10−14 sensitivity: The upgrade of the MEG experiment, Symmetry 13, 1591 (2021).
  56. U. Bellgardt et al. (SINDRUM Collaboration), Search for the decay μ+→e+e+e−, Nucl. Phys. B299, 1 (1988).
  57. G. Hesketh, S. Hughes, A.-K. Perrevoort, and N. Rompotis (Mu3e Collaboration), The Mu3e experiment, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2204.00001.
  58. W. H. Bertl et al. (SINDRUM II Collaboration), A search for muon to electron conversion in muonic gold, Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 337 (2006).
  59. L. Bartoszek et al. (Mu2e Collaboration), Mu2e technical design report, arXiv:1501.05241.
  60. R. Abramishvili et al. (COMET Collaboration), COMET Phase-I technical design report, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 033C01 (2020).
  61. K. Byrum et al. (Mu2e-II Collaboration), Mu2e-II: Muon to electron conversion with PIP-II, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2203.07569.
  62. L. Willmann et al., New bounds from searching for muonium to anti-muonium conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 49 (1999).
  63. A.-Y. Bai et al., Conceptual design of the muonium-to-antimuonium conversion experiment (MACE), arXiv:2410.18817.
  64. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Search for lepton flavor violating decays τ±→ℓ±π0, ℓ±η, ℓ±η′, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 061803 (2007).
  65. Y. Miyazaki et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for lepton flavor violating τ− decays into ℓ−η, ℓ−η′ and ℓ−π0, Phys. Lett. B 648, 341 (2007).
  66. A. Abdesselam et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for lepton-flavor-violating tau-lepton decays to ℓγ at Belle, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 19.
  67. N. Tsuzuki et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for lepton-flavor-violating τ decays into a lepton and a vector meson using the full Belle data sample, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 118.
  68. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Searches for lepton flavor violation in the decays τ±→e±γ and τ±→μ±γ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 021802 (2010).
  69. Y. Miyazaki et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for lepton flavor violating τ− decays into ℓ−Ks0 and ℓ−Ks0Ks0, Phys. Lett. B 692, 4 (2010).
  70. K. Hayasaka et al., Search for lepton flavor violating tau decays into three leptons with 719 million produced τ+τ− pairs, Phys. Lett. B 687, 139 (2010).
  71. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Search for lepton-flavor-violating τ−→μ−μ+μ− decays at Belle II, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 062.
  72. S. Banerjee et al., Snowmass 2021 white paper: Charged lepton flavor violation in the tau sector, arXiv:2203.14919.
  73. L. Aggarwal et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Snowmass white paper: Belle II physics reach and plans for the next decade and beyond, arXiv:2207.06307.
  74. S. Banerjee, Searches for lepton flavor violation in tau decays at Belle II, Universe 8, 480 (2022).
  75. L. Calibbi, X. Marcano, and J. Roy, Z lepton flavour violation as a probe for new physics at future e+e− colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1054 (2021).
  76. R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators III: Gauge coupling dependence and phenomenology, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 159.
  77. M. Carpentier and S. Davidson, Constraints on two-lepton, two quark operators, Eur. Phys. J. C 70, 1071 (2010).
  78. G. M. Pruna and A. Signer, The μ→eγ decay in a systematic effective field theory approach with dimension 6 operators, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 014.
  79. F. Feruglio, P. Paradisi, and A. Pattori, Lepton flavour violation in composite Higgs models, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 579 (2015).
  80. A. Crivellin, S. Davidson, G. M. Pruna, and A. Signer, Renormalisation-group improved analysis of μ→e processes in a systematic effective-field-theory approach, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 117.
  81. S. Davidson and A. Saporta, Constraints on 2ℓ2q operators from μ−e flavour-changing meson decays, Phys. Rev. D 99, 015032 (2019).
  82. M. Ardu and S. Davidson, What is leading order for LFV in SMEFT?, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 002.
  83. M. Ardu, S. Davidson, and M. Gorbahn, Sensitivity of μ→e processes to τ flavor change, Phys. Rev. D 105, 096040 (2022).
  84. S. Jahedi and A. Sarkar, Exploring optimal sensitivity of lepton flavor violating effective couplings at the e+e− colliders, Phys. Rev. D 110, 095021 (2024).
  85. L. Calibbi, T. Li, X. Marcano, and M. A. Schmidt, Indirect constraints on lepton-flavor-violating quarkonium decays, Phys. Rev. D 106, 115039 (2022).
  86. Y. Hamada, R. Kitano, R. Matsudo, H. Takaura, and M. Yoshida, μTRISTAN, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 053B02 (2022).
  87. W. Altmannshofer, P. Munbodh, and T. Oh, Probing lepton flavor violation at circular electron-positron colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 026.
  88. K. Fridell, R. Kitano, and R. Takai, Lepton flavor physics at μ+μ+ colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 086.
  89. W. Abdallah et al. (CEPC Study Group), CEPC Technical design report: Accelerator, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods 8, 1 (2024); 9, 184(E) (2025).
  90. A. Abada et al. (FCC Collaboration), FCC physics opportunities: Future circular collider conceptual design report volume 1, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 474 (2019).
  91. F. Feruglio, C. Hagedorn, Y. Lin, and L. Merlo, Tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing and quark masses from a discrete flavour symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B775, 120 (2007); B836, 127(E) (2010).
  92. A. Blum, C. Hagedorn, and M. Lindner, Fermion masses and mixings from dihedral flavor symmetries with preserved subgroups, Phys. Rev. D 77, 076004 (2008).
  93. C. Hagedorn and D. Meloni, D14—A common origin of the Cabibbo angle and the lepton mixing angle θ13l, Nucl. Phys. B862, 691 (2012).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation