Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Three-body decay ϕ→π+π−π0 with Omnès-type final-state interactions

Seung-il Nam1,* and Jung Keun Ahn2

  • *Contact author: sinam@pknu.ac.kr

Phys. Rev. D 114, 014022 – Published 9 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/b56t-npm7

Abstract

We investigate the decay ϕ→π+π−π0 in an effective-Lagrangian framework that keeps the dominant ρπ mechanism, the direct three-pion term, and a real constant background contribution explicitly separated at the amplitude level. The resonant contribution is described with the Gounaris-Sakurai propagator, the neutral channel includes ρ0−ω mixing, and the leading elastic I=1, P-wave ππ final-state interaction is incorporated through the complex, s-dependent Omnès function Ω1(s+i0). The Omnès factor is applied channel by channel to the three two-pion subsystems, while the direct amplitude is dressed by the averaged factor Ωdir=(Ω0+Ω++Ω−)/3. To avoid double counting the elastic rescattering already contained in the physical ρ→ππ coupling, we introduce gρππbare=gρππphys/|Ω1(mρ2)| in the Omnès-dressed ρ-exchange amplitude. With the final parameter set used in this work, we obtain Γth=0.6915  MeV, slightly above the empirical estimate Γexp≈0.660±0.020  MeV, while the direct integrated weight is reproduced at the KLOE (K LOng Experiment) scale, Idir=8.393×10−3. The corresponding resonant weight is Iρπ=0.9619. The resulting Dalitz distribution retains the expected ρπ-dominated three-band structure and shows the localized neutral-channel deformation induced by ρ0−ω mixing. Remaining discrepancies in the x and especially the y projections indicate the limitations of the present minimal single-channel Omnès implementation and motivate a next-stage analysis based on a full dispersive crossed-channel treatment and a direct fit to the efficiency-corrected KLOE Dalitz-bin data.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (25)

  1. A. Aloisio et al. (KLOE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 561, 55 (2003); 609, 449(E) (2005).
  2. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  3. J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. 37B, 95 (1971).
  4. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B223, 422 (1983).
  5. S. Rudaz, Phys. Lett. 145B, 281 (1984).
  6. O. Kaymakcalan, S. Rajeev, and J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D 30, 594 (1984).
  7. T. Fujiwara, T. Kugo, H. Terao, S. Uehara, and K. Yamawaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 73, 926 (1985).
  8. A. Garcia-Lorenzo et al. (JPAC Collaboration), arXiv:2505.15309.
  9. H. Yan, M. Mai, M. Garofalo, U. G. Meißner, C. Liu, L. Liu, and C. Urbach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 211906 (2024).
  10. M. Mai and M. Döring, Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 240 (2017).
  11. M. K. Volkov, A. A. Pivovarov, and K. Nurlan, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35, 2050200 (2020).
  12. G. J. Gounaris and J. J. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 244 (1968).
  13. P. C. McNamee, M. D. Scadron, and S. A. Coon, Nucl. Phys. A249, 483 (1975).
  14. S. A. Coon and R. C. Barrett, Phys. Rev. C 36, 2189 (1987).
  15. A. Bernicha, G. Lopez Castro, and J. Pestieau, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4454 (1994).
  16. H. B. O’Connell, B. C. Pearce, A. W. Thomas, and A. G. Williams, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 39, 201 (1997).
  17. S. Gardner and H. B. O’Connell, Phys. Rev. D 57, 2716 (1998); 62, 019903(E) (2000).
  18. F. Niecknig, B. Kubis, and S. P. Schneider, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2014 (2012).
  19. I. V. Danilkin, C. Fernández-Ramírez, P. Guo, V. Mathieu, D. Schott, M. Shi, and A. P. Szczepaniak, Phys. Rev. D 91, 094029 (2015).
  20. R. Omnès, Nuovo Cimento 8, 316 (1958).
  21. K. M. Watson, Phys. Rev. 88, 1163 (1952).
  22. G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B603, 125 (2001).
  23. R. Garcia-Martin, R. Kamiński, J. R. Peláez, J. Ruiz de Elvira, and F. J. Ynduráin, Phys. Rev. D 83, 074004 (2011).
  24. I. Caprini, G. Colangelo, and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 132001 (2006).
  25. J. R. Pelaez, Phys. Rep. 658, 1 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation