- Open Access
Three-body decay with Omnès-type final-state interactions
Phys. Rev. D 114, 014022 – Published 9 July, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/b56t-npm7
Abstract
We investigate the decay in an effective-Lagrangian framework that keeps the dominant mechanism, the direct three-pion term, and a real constant background contribution explicitly separated at the amplitude level. The resonant contribution is described with the Gounaris-Sakurai propagator, the neutral channel includes mixing, and the leading elastic , -wave final-state interaction is incorporated through the complex, -dependent Omnès function . The Omnès factor is applied channel by channel to the three two-pion subsystems, while the direct amplitude is dressed by the averaged factor . To avoid double counting the elastic rescattering already contained in the physical coupling, we introduce in the Omnès-dressed -exchange amplitude. With the final parameter set used in this work, we obtain , slightly above the empirical estimate , while the direct integrated weight is reproduced at the KLOE (K LOng Experiment) scale, . The corresponding resonant weight is . The resulting Dalitz distribution retains the expected -dominated three-band structure and shows the localized neutral-channel deformation induced by mixing. Remaining discrepancies in the and especially the projections indicate the limitations of the present minimal single-channel Omnès implementation and motivate a next-stage analysis based on a full dispersive crossed-channel treatment and a direct fit to the efficiency-corrected KLOE Dalitz-bin data.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (25)
- A. Aloisio et al. (KLOE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 561, 55 (2003); 609, 449(E) (2005).
- S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
- J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. 37B, 95 (1971).
- E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B223, 422 (1983).
- S. Rudaz, Phys. Lett. 145B, 281 (1984).
- O. Kaymakcalan, S. Rajeev, and J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D 30, 594 (1984).
- T. Fujiwara, T. Kugo, H. Terao, S. Uehara, and K. Yamawaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 73, 926 (1985).
- A. Garcia-Lorenzo et al. (JPAC Collaboration), arXiv:2505.15309.
- H. Yan, M. Mai, M. Garofalo, U. G. Meißner, C. Liu, L. Liu, and C. Urbach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 211906 (2024).
- M. Mai and M. Döring, Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 240 (2017).
- M. K. Volkov, A. A. Pivovarov, and K. Nurlan, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35, 2050200 (2020).
- G. J. Gounaris and J. J. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 244 (1968).
- P. C. McNamee, M. D. Scadron, and S. A. Coon, Nucl. Phys. A249, 483 (1975).
- S. A. Coon and R. C. Barrett, Phys. Rev. C 36, 2189 (1987).
- A. Bernicha, G. Lopez Castro, and J. Pestieau, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4454 (1994).
- H. B. O’Connell, B. C. Pearce, A. W. Thomas, and A. G. Williams, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 39, 201 (1997).
- S. Gardner and H. B. O’Connell, Phys. Rev. D 57, 2716 (1998); 62, 019903(E) (2000).
- F. Niecknig, B. Kubis, and S. P. Schneider, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2014 (2012).
- I. V. Danilkin, C. Fernández-Ramírez, P. Guo, V. Mathieu, D. Schott, M. Shi, and A. P. Szczepaniak, Phys. Rev. D 91, 094029 (2015).
- R. Omnès, Nuovo Cimento 8, 316 (1958).
- K. M. Watson, Phys. Rev. 88, 1163 (1952).
- G. Colangelo, J. Gasser, and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B603, 125 (2001).
- R. Garcia-Martin, R. Kamiński, J. R. Peláez, J. Ruiz de Elvira, and F. J. Ynduráin, Phys. Rev. D 83, 074004 (2011).
- I. Caprini, G. Colangelo, and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 132001 (2006).
- J. R. Pelaez, Phys. Rep. 658, 1 (2016).