Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Solving key challenges in collider physics with foundation models

Vinicius Mikuni1,* and Benjamin Nachman2,3,†

  • *Contact author: vmikuni@lbl.gov
  • †Contact author: bpnachman@lbl.gov

Phys. Rev. D 111, L051504 – Published 17 March, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L051504

Abstract

Foundation models are neural networks that are capable of simultaneously solving many problems. Large language foundation models like ChatGPT have revolutionized many aspects of daily life, but their impact for science is not yet clear. In this paper, we use a new foundation model for hadronic jets to solve three key challenges in collider physics. In particular, we show how experiments can (1) save significant computing power when developing reconstruction algorithms, (2) perform a complete uncertainty quantification for high-dimensional measurements, and (3) search for new physics with model agnostic methods using low-level inputs. In each case, there are significant computational or methodological challenges with current methods that limit the science potential of deep learning algorithms. By solving each problem, we take jet foundation models beyond proof-of-principle studies and into the toolkit of practitioners.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Method to simultaneously facilitate all jet physics tasks

Vinicius Mikuni and Benjamin Nachman
Phys. Rev. D 111, 054015 (2025)

Article Text

References (60)

  1. K. Cranmer, J. Brehmer, and G. Louppe, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 30055 (2020).
  2. M. Arratia et al., J. Instrum. 17, P01024 (2021).
  3. H. Du, C. Krause, V. Mikuni, B. Nachman, I. Pang, and D. Shih, arXiv:2404.18992.
  4. G. Kasieczka et al., Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 124201 (2021).
  5. C. Balázs et al. (DarkMachines High Dimensional Sampling Group), J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 108.
  6. G. Karagiorgi, G. Kasieczka, S. Kravitz, B. Nachman, and D. Shih, arXiv:2112.03769.
  7. ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 131801 (2020).
  8. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 081801 (2024).
  9. ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 108, 052009 (2023).
  10. CMS Collaboration, Model-agnostic search for dijet resonances with anomalous jet substructure in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Technical Report No. CMS-PAS-EXO-22-026, CERN, Geneva, 2024, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2892677.
  11. H1 Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 132002 (2021).
  12. H1 Collaboration, H1prelim-22-031 (2022), https://www-h1.desy.de/h1/www/publications/htmlsplit/H1prelim-22-031.long.html.
  13. H1 Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 844, 138101 (2023).
  14. H1 Collaboration, H1prelim-23-031 (2023), https://www-h1.desy.de/h1/www/publications/htmlsplit/H1prelim-23-031.long.html.
  15. LHCb Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 108, L031103 (2023).
  16. P. T. Komiske, S. Kryhin, and J. Thaler, Phys. Rev. D 106, 094021 (2022).
  17. Y. Song (STAR Collaboration), arXiv:2307.07718.
  18. J. Batson and Y. Kahn, arXiv:2312.02264.
  19. B. M. Dillon, G. Kasieczka, H. Olischlager, T. Plehn, P. Sorrenson, and L. Vogel, SciPost Phys. 12, 188 (2021).
  20. B. M. Dillon, R. Mastandrea, and B. Nachman, Phys. Rev. D 106, 056005 (2022).
  21. B. M. Dillon, L. Favaro, F. Feiden, T. Modak, and T. Plehn, SciPost Phys. Core 7, 056 (2024).
  22. L. Heinrich, T. Golling, M. Kagan, S. Klein, M. Leigh, M. Osadchy, and J. A. Raine, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 5, 035074 (2024).
  23. P. Harris, M. Kagan, J. Krupa, B. Maier, and N. Woodward, arXiv:2403.07066.
  24. B. Hashemi, Deep generative models for ultra-high granularity particle physics detector simulation: A voyage from emulation to extrapolation, Other thesis, 2024, arXiv:2403.13825.
  25. M. P. Kuchera, R. Ramanujan, J. Z. Taylor, R. R. Strauss, D. Bazin, J. Bradt, and R. Chen, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 940, 156 (2019).
  26. A. Chappell and L. H. Whitehead, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1099 (2022).
  27. F. A. Dreyer, R. Grabarczyk, and P. F. Monni, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 564 (2022).
  28. H. Beauchesne, Z.-E. Chen, and C.-W. Chiang, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 138.
  29. Simultaneous PRD Submission.

  30. E. Buhmann, C. Ewen, G. Kasieczka, V. Mikuni, B. Nachman, and D. Shih, Phys. Rev. D 109, 055015 (2024).
  31. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, CoRR abs/1706.03762 (2017).
  32. Y. Wang, Y. Sun, Z. Liu, S. E. Sarma, M. M. Bronstein, and J. M. Solomon, CoRR abs/1801.07829 (2018).
  33. H. Qu, C. Li, and S. Qian, arXiv:2202.03772.
  34. ATLAS Collaboration, Constituent-based top-quark tagging with the ATLAS detector, Technical Report No. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2022-039, CERN, Geneva, 2022, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2825328.
  35. R. D. Ball et al., Nucl. Phys. B867, 244 (2013).
  36. A. Buckley, in Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Multiple Partonic Interactions at the LHC (2014), p. 29.
  37. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 334 (2021).
  38. M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam, Phys. Lett. B 641, 57 (2006).
  39. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012).
  40. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2008) 063.
  41. P. Berta, M. Spousta, D. W. Miller, and R. Leitner, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 092.
  42. P. Berta, L. Masetti, D. W. Miller, and M. Spousta, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 175.
  43. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 59 (2015).
  44. A. J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and J. Thaler, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2014) 146.
  45. A. Andreassen, P. T. Komiske, E. M. Metodiev, B. Nachman, and J. Thaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 182001 (2020).
  46. A. Andreassen, P. T. Komiske, E. M. Metodiev, B. Nachman, A. Suresh, and J. Thaler, arXiv:2105.04448.
  47. M. Bahr et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 58, 639 (2008).
  48. J. Bellm et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 196 (2016).
  49. J. Bellm et al., arXiv:1705.06919.
  50. ATLAS Collaboration (2014), https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419.
  51. G. D’Agostini, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 362, 487 (1995).
  52. F. Topsoe, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 46, 1602 (2000).
  53. P. Gras, S. Höche, D. Kar, A. Larkoski, L. Lönnblad, S. Plätzer, A. Siódmok, P. Skands, G. Soyez, and J. Thaler, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 091.
  54. S. Bright-Thonney and B. Nachman, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 098.
  55. E. M. Metodiev, B. Nachman, and J. Thaler, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 174.
  56. J. H. Collins, K. Howe, and B. Nachman, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014038 (2019).
  57. A. Hallin, J. Isaacson, G. Kasieczka, C. Krause, B. Nachman, T. Quadfasel, M. Schlaffer, D. Shih, and M. Sommerhalder, Phys. Rev. D 106, 055006 (2021).
  58. G. Kasieczka, B. Nachman, and D. Shih, Official Datasets for LHC Olympics 2020 Anomaly Detection Challenge (Version v6) [Data set], 10.5281/zenodo.4536624 (2019).
  59. M. Zaheer, S. Kottur, S. Ravanbakhsh, B. Poczos, R. Salakhutdinov, and A. Smola, arXiv:1703.06114.
  60. V. Mikuni and P. Hebbar, ViniciusMikuni/OmniLearn: Zenodo entry (1.1) (Zenodo, 2025), 10.5281/zenodo.14977181.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation