Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Probing flavored regimes of leptogenesis with gravitational waves from cosmic strings

Marco Chianese1,2,*, Satyabrata Datta3,†, Gennaro Miele1,2,4,‡, Rome Samanta4,2,§, and Ninetta Saviano2,4,∥

  • *Contact author: marco.chianese@unina.it
  • †Contact author: amisatyabrata703@gmail.com
  • ‡Contact author: miele@na.infn.it
  • §Contact author: samanta@na.infn.it
  • ∥Contact author: nsaviano@na.infn.it

Phys. Rev. D 111, L041305 – Published 12 February, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L041305

Abstract

Cosmic strings radiate detectable gravitational waves in models featuring high-scale symmetry breaking, e.g., high-scale leptogenesis. In this Letter, for the first time, we show that different flavored regimes of high-scale leptogenesis can be tested with the spectral features in cosmic string-radiated gravitational waves. This is possible if the scalar field that makes right-handed neutrinos massive is feebly coupled to the Standard Model Higgs. Each flavored regime, sensitive to low-energy neutrino experiments, leaves a marked imprint on the gravitational waves spectrum. A three-flavor and a two-flavor regime could be probed by a characteristic fall-off of the gravitational wave spectrum at the LISA-DECIGO-ET frequency bands with preceding scale-invariant amplitudes bounded from above and below. We present gravitational waves windows for flavored regimes of leptogenesis testable in the upcoming experiments. We also provide the first construction of a leptogenesis framework where a testable distinction of flavor regimes is possible without constraining the flavor structure of the theory.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (63)

  1. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986).
  2. P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016).
  3. V. A. Kuzmin, V. A. Rubakov, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. 155B, 36 (1985).
  4. S. Davidson, E. Nardi, and Y. Nir, Phys. Rep. 466, 105 (2008).
  5. W. Buchmuller, P. Di Bari, and M. Plumacher, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 315, 305 (2005).
  6. A. Abada, S. Davidson, A. Ibarra, F. X. Josse-Michaux, M. Losada, and A. Riotto, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2006) 010.
  7. E. Nardi, Y. Nir, E. Roulet, and J. Racker, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2006) 164.
  8. S. Blanchet and P. Di Bari, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2007) 018.
  9. S. Pascoli, S. T. Petcov, and A. Riotto, Nucl. Phys. B774, 1 (2007).
  10. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 171802 (2018).
  11. M. A. Acero et al. (NOvA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 98, 032012 (2018).
  12. E. K. Akhmedov, M. Frigerio, and A. Y. Smirnov, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2003) 021.
  13. E. Bertuzzo, P. Di Bari, F. Feruglio, and E. Nardi, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2009) 036.
  14. J. A. Dror, T. Hiramatsu, K. Kohri, H. Murayama, and G. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 041804 (2020).
  15. S. Blasi, V. Brdar, and K. Schmitz, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043321 (2020).
  16. R. Samanta and S. Datta, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 211.
  17. S. Datta, A. Ghosal, and R. Samanta, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2021) 021.
  18. A. Davidson, Phys. Rev. D 20, 776 (1979).
  19. R. E. Marshak and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Lett. 91B, 222 (1980).
  20. W. Buchmüller, V. Domcke, K. Kamada, and K. Schmitz, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2013) 003.
  21. W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke, H. Murayama, and K. Schmitz, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135764 (2020).
  22. W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke, and K. Schmitz, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2023) 020.
  23. T. W. B. Kibble, J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976).
  24. M. B. Hindmarsh and T. W. B. Kibble, Rep. Prog. Phys. 58, 477 (1995).
  25. R. Jeannerot, J. Rocher, and M. Sakellariadou, Phys. Rev. D 68, 103514 (2003).
  26. A. Vilenkin, Phys. Lett. 107B, 47 (1981).
  27. T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 31, 3052 (1985).
  28. M. Chianese, S. Datta, R. Samanta, and N. Saviano, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2024) 051.
  29. G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L8 (2023).
  30. J. Antoniadis et al. (EPTA, InPTA Collaborations), Astron. Astrophys. 678, A50 (2023).
  31. D. J. Reardon et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L6 (2023).
  32. H. Xu et al., Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23, 075024 (2023).
  33. J. Antoniadis et al. (EPTA Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 685, A94 (2024).
  34. A. Afzal et al. (NANOGrav Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L11 (2023).
  35. D. Matsunami, L. Pogosian, A. Saurabh, and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 201301 (2019).
  36. P. Auclair, D. A. Steer, and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 101, 083511 (2020).
  37. R. H. Cyburt, B. D. Fields, K. A. Olive, and T.-H. Yeh, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015004 (2016).
  38. T. Hasegawa, N. Hiroshima, K. Kohri, R. S. L. Hansen, T. Tram, and S. Hannestad, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2019) 012.
  39. P. Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA Collaboration), arXiv:1702.00786.
  40. S. Kawamura et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 23, S125 (2006).
  41. B. Sathyaprakash et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 124013 (2012); B Sathyaprakash30, 079501(E) (2013).
  42. A. D. Linde, Rep. Prog. Phys. 42, 389 (1979).
  43. T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rep. 67, 183 (1980).
  44. S. Datta and R. Samanta, Phys. Rev. D 108, L091706 (2023).
  45. E. Masso, F. Rota, and G. Zsembinszki, Phys. Rev. D 72, 084007 (2005).
  46. S. Datta and R. Samanta, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 159.
  47. C. Gross, O. Lebedev, and M. Zatta, Phys. Lett. B 753, 178 (2016).
  48. K. Enqvist, M. Karciauskas, O. Lebedev, S. Rusak, and M. Zatta, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2016) 025.
  49. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L041305 for further details on the scalar field evolution and entropy density, on the string thickness, and on the impact of the gauge coupling on the GWFRL windows.
  50. T. Han and X. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 036.
  51. C. T. Hill, H. M. Hodges, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 37, 263 (1988).
  52. J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and B. Shlaer, Phys. Rev. D 89, 023512 (2014).
  53. J. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, Phys. Rev. D 96, 104046 (2017).
  54. C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, Phys. Rev. D 54, 2535 (1996).
  55. C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, Phys. Rev. D 65, 043514 (2002).
  56. L. Sousa and P. P. Avelino, Phys. Rev. D 88, 023516 (2013).
  57. P. Auclair et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2020) 034.
  58. T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 64, 064008 (2001).
  59. G. S. F. Guedes, P. P. Avelino, and L. Sousa, Phys. Rev. D 98, 123505 (2018).
  60. A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 43, 1060 (1991).
  61. J. Baeza-Ballesteros, E. J. Copeland, D. G. Figueroa, and J. Lizarraga, arXiv:2408.02364.
  62. L. Sousa, P. P. Avelino, and G. S. F. Guedes, Phys. Rev. D 101, 103508 (2020).
  63. Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, D. E. Morrissey, and J. D. Wells, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 081.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation