Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Entanglement asymmetry study of black hole radiation

Filiberto Ares1, Sara Murciano2, Lorenzo Piroli3, and Pasquale Calabrese1,4

Phys. Rev. D 110, L061901 – Published 13 September, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L061901

Abstract

Hawking’s discovery that black holes can evaporate through radiation emission has posed a number of questions that with time became fundamental hallmarks for a quantum theory of gravity. The most famous one is likely the information paradox, which finds an elegant explanation in the Page argument suggesting that a black hole and its radiation can be effectively represented by a random state of qubits. Leveraging the same assumption, we ponder the extent to which a black hole may display emergent symmetries, employing the entanglement asymmetry as a modern, information-based indicator of symmetry breaking. We find that for a random state devoid of any symmetry, a U(1) symmetry emerges and it is exact in the thermodynamic limit before the Page time. At the Page time, the entanglement asymmetry shows a finite jump to a large value. Our findings imply that the emitted radiation is symmetric up to the Page time and then undergoes a sharp transition. Conversely the black hole is symmetric only after the Page time.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (52)

  1. S. W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975).
  2. S. W. Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D 14, 2460 (1976).
  3. D. N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291 (1993).
  4. D. N. Page, Information in black hole radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3743 (1993).
  5. A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 63.
  6. G. Penington, Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 002.
  7. A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 013.
  8. G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 205.
  9. C. W. Misner and J. A. Wheeler, Classical physics as geometry: Gravitation, electromagnetism, unquantized charge, and mass as properties of curved empty space, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 2, 525 (1957).
  10. T. Banks and L. J. Dixon, Constraints on string vacua with space-time supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B307, 93 (1988).
  11. R. Kallosh, A. Linde, D. Linde, and L. Susskind, Gravity and global symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 52, 912 (1995).
  12. T. Banks and N. Seiberg, Symmetries and strings in field theory and gravity, Phys. Rev. D 83, 084019 (2011).
  13. D. Harlow and H. Ooguri, Constraints on symmetry from holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 191601 (2019).
  14. D. Harlow and H. Ooguri, Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity, Commun. Math. Phys. 383, 1669 (2021).
  15. D. Harlow and E. Shaghoulian, Global symmetry, Euclidean gravity, and the black hole information problem, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 175.
  16. F. Ares, S. Murciano, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry as a probe of symmetry breaking, Nat. Commun. 14, 2036 (2023).
  17. F. Ares, S. Murciano, E. Vernier, and P. Calabrese, Lack of symmetry restoration after a quantum quench: An entanglement asymmetry study, SciPost Phys. 15, 089 (2023).
  18. B. Bertini, K. Klobas, M. Collura, P. Calabrese, and C. Rylands, Dynamics of charge fluctuations from asymmetric initial states, Phys. Rev. B 109, 184312 (2024).
  19. F. Ferro, F. Ares, and P. Calabrese, Non-equilibrium entanglement asymmetry for discrete groups: The example of the XY spin chain, J. Stat. Mech. (2024) L023101.
  20. L. Capizzi and M. Mazzoni, Entanglement asymmetry in the ordered phase of many-body systems: The Ising field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 144.
  21. C. Rylands, K. Klobas, F. Ares, P. Calabrese, S. Murciano, and B. Bertini, Microscopic origin of the quantum Mpemba effect in integrable systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 010401 (2024).
  22. L. Capizzi and V. Vitale, A universal formula for the entanglement asymmetry of matrix product states, arXiv:2310.01962.
  23. S. Murciano, F. Ares, I. Klich, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry and quantum Mpemba effect in the XY spin chain, J. Stat. Mech. (2024) L013103.
  24. M. Chen and H.-H. Chen, Rényi entanglement asymmetry in 1+1-dimensional conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. D 109, 065009 (2024).
  25. P. H. C. Lau, T. Noumi, Y. Takii, and K. Tamaoka, Page curve and symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 015.
  26. E. Bianchi and P. Dona, Typical entanglement entropy in the presence of a center: Page curve and its variance, Phys. Rev. D 100, 105010 (2019).
  27. S. Murciano, P. Calabrese, and L. Piroli, Symmetry-resolved Page curves, Phys. Rev. D 106, 046015 (2022).
  28. P. Li and Y. Ling, Refined symmetry-resolved Page curve and charged black holes, Chin. Phys. C 48, 053109 (2024).
  29. C. Han, Y. Meir, and E. Sela, Realistic protocol to measure entanglement at finite temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 136201 (2023).
  30. J. A. Vaccaro, F. Anselmi, H. M. Wiseman, and K. Jacobs, Tradeoff between extractable mechanical work, accessible entanglement, and ability to act as a reference system, under arbitrary superselection rules, Phys. Rev. A 77, 032114 (2008).
  31. G. Gour, I. Marvian, and R. W. Spekkens, Measuring the quality of a quantum reference frame: The relative entropy of frameness, Phys. Rev. A 80, 012307 (2009).
  32. I. Marvian and R. W Spekkens, Extending Noether’s theorem by quantifying the asymmetry of quantum states, Nat. Commun. 5, 3821 (2014).
  33. R. Takagi, Skew informations from an operational view via resource theory of asymmetry, Sci. Rep. 9, 14562 (2019).
  34. M. P. A. Fisher, V. Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vijay, Random quantum circuits, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 335 (2023).
  35. A. C. Potter and R. Vasseur, Entanglement dynamics in hybrid quantum circuits, in Entanglement in Spin Chains: From Theory to Quantum Technology Applications, edited by A. Bayat, S. Bose, and H. Johannesson (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022), pp. 211–249.
  36. D. Weingarten, Asymptotic behavior of group integrals in the limit of infinite rank, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 19, 999 (1978).
  37. B. Collins and P. Sniady, Integration with respect to the Haar measure on unitary, orthogonal and symplectic group, Commun. Math. Phys. 264, 773 (2006).
  38. C.-M. Jian, Y.-Z. You, R. Vasseur, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Measurement-induced criticality in random quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104302 (2020).
  39. E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, M. Kieburg, M. Rigol, and L. Vidmar, Volume-law entanglement entropy of typical pure quantum states, PRX Quantum 3, 030201 (2022).
  40. P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2007) 120.
  41. Y. Chen and H. W. Lin, Signatures of global symmetry violation in relative entropies and replica wormholes, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 040.
  42. P.-S. Hsin, L. V. Iliesiu, and Z. Yang, A violation of global symmetries from replica wormholes and the fate of black hole remnants, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 194004 (2021).
  43. L. Piroli, C. Sünderhauf, and X.-L. Qi, A random unitary circuit model for black hole evaporation, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 63.
  44. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, and J. E. Santos, Entanglement islands in higher dimensions, SciPost Phys. 9, 001 (2020).
  45. H. Geng and A. Karch, Massive islands, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 121.
  46. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, and Y. Zhao, The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 149.
  47. M. Rozali J. Sully, M. Van Raamsdonk, C. Waddell, and D. Wakeham, Information radiation in BCFT models of black holes, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 004.
  48. H. Z. Chen, Z. Fisher, J. Hernandez, R. C. Myers, and S.-M. Ruan, Information flow in black hole evaporation, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 152.
  49. S. Liberati, G. Tricella, and A. Trombettoni, The information loss problem: An analogue gravity perspective, Entropy 21, 940 (2019).
  50. V. I. Kolobov, K. Golubkov, J. R. Munoz de Nova, and J. Steinhauer, Spontaneous Hawking radiation and beyond: Observing the time evolution of an analogue black hole, Nat. Phys. 17, 362 (2021).
  51. S. Liberati, G. Tricella, and A. Trombettoni, Back-reaction in canonical analogue black holes, Appl. Sci. 10, 8868 (2020).
  52. S. Liu, H.-K. Zhang, S. Yin, and S.-X. Zhang, Symmetry restoration and quantum Mpemba effect in symmetric random circuits, arXiv:2403.08459.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation