Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Dark sink enhances the direct detection of freeze-in dark matter

Prudhvi N. Bhattiprolu1, Robert McGehee2,1, and Aaron Pierce1

  • 1Leinweber Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
  • 2William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

Phys. Rev. D 110, L031702 – Published 12 August, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L031702

Abstract

We describe a simple dark sector structure which, if present, has implications for the direct detection of dark matter (DM); the dark sink. A dark sink transports energy density from the DM into light dark-sector states that do not appreciably contribute to the DM density. As an example, we consider a light, neutral fermion ψ which interacts solely with DM χ via the exchange of a heavy scalar Φ. We illustrate the impact of a dark sink by adding one to a DM freeze-in model in which χ couples to a light dark photon γ′ which kinetically mixes with the Standard Model (SM) photon. This freeze-in model (absent the sink) is itself a benchmark for ongoing experiments. In some cases, the literature for this benchmark has contained errors; we correct the predictions and provide them as a public code. We then analyze how the dark sink modifies this benchmark, solving coupled Boltzmann equations for the dark-sector energy density and DM yield. We check the contribution of the dark sink ψ’s to dark radiation; consistency with existing data limits the maximum attainable cross section. For DM with a mass between MeV−O(10  GeV), adding the dark sink can increase predictions for the direct detection cross section all the way up to the current limits.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (44)

  1. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018).
  2. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251801 (2019).
  3. P. Adari et al. (SENSEI Collaboration), arXiv:2312.13342.
  4. L. Barak et al. (SENSEI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 171802 (2020).
  5. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 101002 (2023).
  6. S. Li et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 261001 (2023).
  7. I. Arnquist et al. (DAMIC-M Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 171003 (2023).
  8. I. Arnquist et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 101006 (2024).
  9. R. Essig et al., in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2203.08297.
  10. L. J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell, and S. M. West, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 080.
  11. X. Chu, T. Hambye, and M. H. G. Tytgat, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2012) 034.
  12. R. Essig, J. Mardon, and T. Volansky, Phys. Rev. D 85, 076007 (2012).
  13. H. An, M. Pospelov, and J. Pradler, Phys. Lett. B 725, 190 (2013).
  14. E. Hardy and R. Lasenby, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2017) 033.
  15. N. Sabti, J. Alvey, M. Escudero, M. Fairbairn, and D. Blas, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2020) 004.
  16. G. Elor, R. McGehee, and A. Pierce, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 031803 (2023).
  17. P. N. Bhattiprolu, G. Elor, R. McGehee, and A. Pierce, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 128.
  18. N. Fernandez, Y. Kahn, and J. Shelton, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 044.
  19. S. Heeba, T. Lin, and K. Schutz, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095016 (2023).
  20. D. J. Fixsen, E. S. Cheng, J. M. Gales, J. C. Mather, R. A. Shafer, and E. L. Wright, Astrophys. J. 473, 576 (1996).
  21. A. Caputo, H. Liu, S. Mishra-Sharma, and J. T. Ruderman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 221303 (2020).
  22. M. Baryakhtar, R. Lasenby, and M. Teo, Phys. Rev. D 96, 035019 (2017).
  23. N. Siemonsen, C. Mondino, D. Egana-Ugrinovic, J. Huang, M. Baryakhtar, and W. E. East, Phys. Rev. D 107, 075025 (2023).
  24. C. Dvorkin, T. Lin, and K. Schutz, Phys. Rev. D 99, 115009 (2019); 105, 119901(E) (2022).
  25. C. Cheung, G. Elor, L. J. Hall, and P. Kumar, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2011) 042.
  26. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L031702 contains details of the freeze-in calculation, as well as details of the dark matter yield for additional masses.
  27. H. An, H. Nie, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, Phys. Rev. D 104, 103026 (2021).
  28. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  29. K. N. Abazajian et al. (CMB-S4 Collaboration), arXiv:1610.02743.
  30. M. A. Buen-Abad, R. Essig, D. McKeen, and Y.-M. Zhong, Phys. Rep. 961, 1 (2022).
  31. T. Hambye, M. H. G. Tytgat, J. Vandecasteele, and L. Vanderheyden, Phys. Rev. D 98, 075017 (2018).
  32. M. Cielo, M. Escudero, G. Mangano, and O. Pisanti, Phys. Rev. D 108, L121301 (2023).
  33. R. Essig, M. Fernandez-Serra, J. Mardon, A. Soto, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 046.
  34. A. Stebbins and G. Krnjaic, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2019) 003.
  35. R. Lasenby, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2020) 034.
  36. Y. Hochberg, I. Charaev, S.-W. Nam, V. Verma, M. Colangelo, and K. K. Berggren, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 151802 (2019).
  37. R. M. Geilhufe, F. Kahlhoefer, and M. W. Winkler, Phys. Rev. D 101, 055005 (2020).
  38. S. M. Griffin, Y. Hochberg, K. Inzani, N. Kurinsky, T. Lin, and T. Chin, Phys. Rev. D 103, 075002 (2021).
  39. Y. Hochberg, Y. Kahn, N. Kurinsky, B. V. Lehmann, T. C. Yu, and K. K. Berggren, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151802 (2021).
  40. S. Knapen, J. Kozaczuk, and T. Lin, Phys. Rev. D 104, 015031 (2021).
  41. Y. Hochberg, E. D. Kramer, N. Kurinsky, and B. V. Lehmann, Phys. Rev. D 107, 076015 (2023).
  42. R. T. Co, F. D’Eramo, L. J. Hall, and D. Pappadopulo, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2015) 024.
  43. L. Forestell and D. E. Morrissey, arXiv:1811.08905.
  44. https://github.com/prudhvibhattiprolu/FreezeIn.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation