Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

CP violation induced by neutral meson mixing interference

Yin-Fa Shen, Wen-Jie Song, and Qin Qin*

  • *Contact author: qqin@hust.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 110, L031301 – Published 26 August, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L031301

Abstract

We investigate a long-overlooked CP violation effect—the double-mixing CP asymmetry—in a type of cascade decay that involves at least two mixing neutral mesons in the decay chain. It is induced by the interference between different oscillation paths of the neutral mesons in the decay process. The double-mixing CP asymmetry is of critical importance for phenomenology, providing opportunities for clean determination of Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa phase angles free of uncertainties induced by the strong dynamics. To illustrate this point, we perform a phenomenological analysis on two examples: Bs0→ρ0K→ρ0(π−ℓ+νℓ) and B0→D0K→D0(π+ℓ−ν¯ℓ). Our results demonstrate that the double-mixing CP asymmetry can be numerically significant in the absence of strong phases, as shown by the former example. Additionally, the latter example showcases a direct extraction of weak and strong phases from data, without the need for theoretical inputs.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (33)

  1. N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963).
  2. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
  3. A. D. Sakharov, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5, 32 (1967).
  4. W. Bernreuther, Lect. Notes Phys. 591, 237 (2002).
  5. L. Canetti, M. Drewes, and M. Shaposhnikov, New J. Phys. 14, 095012 (2012).
  6. F. S. Yu, D. Wang, and H. n. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 181802 (2017).
  7. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Nature (London) 606, 64 (2022).
  8. J. P. Wang, Q. Qin, and F. S. Yu, arXiv:2211.07332.
  9. U. Nierste and S. Schacht, Phys. Rev. D 92, 054036 (2015).
  10. U. Nierste and S. Schacht, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251801 (2017).
  11. Y. Grossman and Y. Nir, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2012) 002.
  12. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 44, 040001 (2020).
  13. E. Kou et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019); 2020, 029201(E) (2020).
  14. A. Cerri, V. V. Gligorov, S. Malvezzi, J. Martin Camalich, J. Zupan, S. Akar, J. Alimena, B. C. Allanach, W. Altmannshofer, L. Anderlini et al., CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7, 867 (2019).
  15. M. Achasov, X. C. Ai, R. Aliberti, L. P. An, Q. An, X. Z. Bai, Y. Bai, O. Bakina, A. Barnyakov, V. Blinov et al., Front. Phys. (Beijing) 19, 14701 (2024).
  16. A. E. Bondar, Phys. At. Nucl. 76, 1072 (2013).
  17. J. B. Guimarães da Costa et al. (CEPC Study Group), arXiv:1811.10545.
  18. M. Bicer et al. (TLEP Design Study Working Group), J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 164.
  19. Q. Qin, Q. Li, C. D. Lü, F. S. Yu, and S. H. Zhou, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 835 (2018).
  20. A. Ali, A. Y. Parkhomenko, Q. Qin, and W. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 782, 412 (2018).
  21. S. Cheng and Q. Qin, Phys. Rev. D 99, 016019 (2019).
  22. J. N. Ding, Q. Qin, and F. S. Yu, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 766 (2019).
  23. Q. Qin, Y. F. Shen, and F. S. Yu, Chin. Phys. C 45, 103106 (2021).
  24. Y. F. Shen, J. N. Ding, and Q. Qin, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 398 (2022).
  25. W. J. Song, Y. F. Shen, and Q. Qin, arXiv:2403.01904.
  26. I. I. Y. Bigi and A. I. Sanda, Nucl. Phys. B193, 85 (1981).
  27. M. Beneke and M. Neubert, Nucl. Phys. B675, 333 (2003).
  28. A. Ali, G. Kramer, Y. Li, C. D. Lu, Y. L. Shen, W. Wang, and Y. M. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074018 (2007).
  29. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L031301 for numerical analysis of neglected contributions to CP violation in the two example channels in phenomenology.
  30. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  31. Y. S. Amhis et al. (HFLAV Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 107, 052008 (2023).
  32. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 137.
  33. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 131.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation