Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Carrollian supersymmetry and SYK-like models

Oguzhan Kasikci1,*, Mehmet Ozkan1,†, Yi Pang2,3,‡, and Utku Zorba1,§

  • *Contact author: kasikcio@itu.edu.tr
  • †Contact author: ozkanmehm@itu.edu.tr
  • ‡Contact author: pangyi1@tju.edu.cn
  • §Contact author: zorba@itu.edu.tr

Phys. Rev. D 110, L021702 – Published 22 July, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L021702

Abstract

This work challenges the conventional notion that in a spacetime dimension higher than one, a supersymmetric Lagrangian invariably consists of purely bosonic terms, purely fermionic terms, as well as boson-fermion mixing terms. By recasting a relativistic Lagrangian in terms of its nonrelativistic and ultrarelativistic sectors, we reveal that an ultrarelativistic (Carrollian) supersymmetric Lagrangian exhibits an exotic feature; that is, it can exist without a purely bosonic contribution. Based on this result, we demonstrate a link between higher-dimensional Carrollian and (0+1)-dimensional quantum mechanical models, yielding higher-order extensions of supersymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) models in which purely bosonic higher-order terms are absent. Given that supersymmetry plays an essential role in improving the quantum behavior and solubility, our findings may lead to interesting applications in non-AdS holography.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (59)

  1. J.-M. Lévy-Leblond, Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincaré, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré III 3, 1 (1965), http://archive.numdam.org/item/AIHPA_1965__3_1_1_0/.
  2. J.-M. Lévy-Leblond, Possible kinematics, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 9, 1605 (1968).
  3. M. Henneaux, Geometry of zero signature space-times, Bull. Soc. Math. Bel. 31, 47 (1979).
  4. C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, and P. A. Horvathy, Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry, Classical Quantum Gravity 31, 092001 (2014).
  5. L. Donnay and C. Marteau, Carrollian physics at the black hole horizon, Classical Quantum Gravity 36, 165002 (2019).
  6. L. Ciambelli, R. G. Leigh, C. Marteau, and P. M. Petropoulos, Carroll structures, null geometry and conformal isometries, Phys. Rev. D 100, 046010 (2019).
  7. D. Grumiller, A. Pérez, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, R. Troncoso, and C. Zwikel, Spacetime structure near generic horizons and soft hair, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 041601 (2020).
  8. R. F. Penna, Near-horizon Carroll symmetry and black hole Love numbers, arXiv:1812.05643.
  9. L. Freidel and P. Jai-akson, Carrollian hydrodynamics from symmetries, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 055009 (2023).
  10. J. Redondo-Yuste and L. Lehner, Non-linear black hole dynamics and Carrollian fluids, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 240.
  11. L. Marsot, P.-M. Zhang, and P. Horvathy, Anyonic spin-Hall effect on the black hole horizon, Phys. Rev. D 106, L121503 (2022).
  12. J. Hartong, Holographic reconstruction of 3D flat space-time, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2016) 104.
  13. A. Bagchi, R. Basu, A. Kakkar, and A. Mehra, Flat holography: Aspects of the dual field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 147.
  14. L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray, and R. Ruzziconi, Carrollian perspective on celestial holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 071602 (2022).
  15. A. Bagchi, S. Banerjee, R. Basu, and S. Dutta, Scattering amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 241601 (2022).
  16. L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray, and R. Ruzziconi, Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography, Phys. Rev. D 107, 126027 (2023).
  17. A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar, and S. Dutta, AdS Witten diagrams to Carrollian correlators, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2023) 135.
  18. A. Saha, Carrollian approach to 1 + 3D flat holography, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 051.
  19. L. Bidussi, J. Hartong, E. Have, J. Musaeus, and S. Prohazka, Fractons, dipole symmetries and curved spacetime, SciPost Phys. 12, 205 (2022).
  20. L. Marsot, P. M. Zhang, M. Chernodub, and P. A. Horvathy, Hall effects in Carroll dynamics, Phys. Rep. 1028, 1 (2023).
  21. A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, R. Basu, M. Islam, and S. Mondal, Magic fermions: Carroll and flat bands, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 227.
  22. X. Huang, A Chern-Simons theory for dipole symmetry, SciPost Phys. 15, 153 (2023).
  23. J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, A. Pérez, and S. Prohazka, Quantum Carroll/fracton particles, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 041.
  24. P. M. Zhang, H.-X. Zeng, and P. A. Horvathy, MultiCarroll dynamics, arXiv:2306.07002.
  25. J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma, and S. Vandoren, Perfect fluids, SciPost Phys. 5, 003 (2018).
  26. L. Ciambelli, C. Marteau, A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos, and K. Siampos, Covariant Galilean versus Carrollian hydrodynamics from relativistic fluids, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 165001 (2018).
  27. L. Ciambelli, C. Marteau, A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos, and K. Siampos, Flat holography and Carrollian fluids, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 165.
  28. J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma, and S. Vandoren, Carroll stories, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 148.
  29. A. Bagchi, K. S. Kolekar, and A. Shukla, Carrollian origins of Bjorken flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 241601 (2023).
  30. J. Armas and E. Have, Carrollian fluids and spontaneous breaking of boost symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 161606 (2024).
  31. A. Bagchi, K. S. Kolekar, T. Mandal, and A. Shukla, Heavy-ion collisions, Gubser flow, and Carroll hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 109, 056004 (2024).
  32. E. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis, B. Rollier, J. Rosseel, and T. ter Veldhuis, Carroll versus Galilei gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2017) 165.
  33. D. Hansen, N. A. Obers, G. Oling, and B. T. Sogaard, Carroll expansion of general relativity, SciPost Phys. 13, 055 (2022).
  34. D. Grumiller, J. Hartong, S. Prohazka, and J. Salzer, Limits of JT gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 134.
  35. F. Ecker, D. Grumiller, J. Hartong, A. Pérez, S. Prohazka, and R. Troncoso, Carroll black holes, SciPost Phys. 15, 245 (2023).
  36. L. Ravera, AdS Carroll Chern-Simons supergravity in 2+1 dimensions and its flat limit, Phys. Lett. B 795, 331 (2019).
  37. F. Ali and L. Ravera, N-extended Chern-Simons Carrollian supergravities in 2+1 spacetime dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 128.
  38. L. Ravera and U. Zorba, Carrollian and non-relativistic Jackiw–Teitelboim supergravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 107 (2023).
  39. A. Bagchi, S. Chakrabortty, and P. Parekh, Tensionless superstrings: View from the worldsheet, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2016) 113.
  40. A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Chakrabortty, and P. Parekh, Inhomogeneous tensionless superstrings, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 065.
  41. A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Chakrabortty, and P. Parekh, Exotic origins of tensionless superstrings, Phys. Lett. B 801, 135139 (2020).
  42. B. Chen, R. Liu, H. Sun, and Y.-f. Zheng, Constructing Carrollian field theories from null reduction, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 170.
  43. K. Banerjee, R. Basu, B. Krishnan, S. Maulik, A. Mehra, and A. Ray, One-loop quantum effects in Carroll scalars, Phys. Rev. D 108, 085022 (2023).
  44. K. Koutrolikos and M. Najafizadeh, Super Carrollian and super-Galilean field theories, Phys. Rev. D 108, 125014 (2023).
  45. S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993).
  46. A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/; http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev2/. Talks at KITP, April 7, 2015 and May 27, 2015.
  47. W. Fu, D. Gaiotto, J. Maldacena, and S. Sachdev, Supersymmetric Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. D 95, 026009 (2017); 95, 069904(A) (2017).
  48. D. Anninos, T. Anous, and F. Denef, Disordered quivers and cold horizons, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 071.
  49. J. Murugan, D. Stanford, and E. Witten, More on supersymmetric and 2d analogs of the SYK model, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 146.
  50. A. Biggs, J. Maldacena, and V. Narovlansky, A supersymmetric SYK model with a curious low energy behavior, arXiv:2309.08818.
  51. This is different from higher dimensional generalization of SYK model [59] where interactions between nearest sides are turned on.

  52. Exceptional cases may arise when the indices of the Levi-Civita tensor are contracted with derivatives, in which case one ends up with a single term in the Lagrangian with an explicit c-factor. Such models are relativistic by themselves, and we exclude those in our analysis.

  53. S. A. Baig, J. Distler, A. Karch, A. Raz, and H.-Y. Sun, Spacetime subsystem symmetries, arXiv:2303.15590.
  54. E. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis, and L. Parra, The symmetries of the Carroll superparticle, J. Phys. A 49, 185402 (2016).
  55. F. Ecker, D. Grumiller, M. Henneaux, and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, Carroll swiftons, arXiv:2403.00544.
  56. O. Kasikci, M. Ozkan, and Y. Pang, Carrollian origin of spacetime subsystem symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 108, 045020 (2023).
  57. D. Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen, Supergravity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2012), 10.1017/CBO9781139026833.
  58. C. Peng, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich, Correlators in the N=2 supersymmetric SYK Model, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 202.
  59. W. Cai, X.-H. Ge, and G.-H. Yang, Diffusion in higher dimensional SYK model with complex fermions, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2018) 076.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation