Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Cosmic string solution to the radio synchrotron background

Bryce Cyr*, Jens Chluba, and Sandeep Kumar Acharya

  • Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, , Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom

  • *bryce.cyr@manchester.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 109, L121301 – Published 4 June, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L121301

Abstract

We investigate the low-frequency spectral emission from a network of superconducting cosmic string loops in hopes of explaining the observed radio synchrotron background. After considering constraints from a variety of astrophysical and cosmological measurements, we identify a best-fit solution with string tension Gμ≃6.5×10−12 and current I≃2.5×106  GeV. This model yields a convincing fit to the data and may be testable in the near future by spectral distortion (TMS, BISOU) and 21 cm experiments (HERA, SKA, REACH). We also find that soft photon heating protects us against current constraints from global 21 cm experiments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (68)

  1. J. M. Cordes and S. Chatterjee, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 57, 417 (2019).
  2. B. Zhang, Nature (London) 587, 45 (2020).
  3. Y.-W. Yu, K.-S. Cheng, G. Shiu, and H. Tye, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2014) 040.
  4. J. Ye, K. Wang, and Y.-F. Cai, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 720 (2017).
  5. B. Imtiaz, R. Shi, and Y.-F. Cai, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 500 (2020).
  6. D. J. Fixsen, Astrophys. J. 707, 916 (2009).
  7. J. Dowell and G. B. Taylor, Astrophys. J. Lett. 858, L9 (2018).
  8. J. Singal et al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 130, 036001 (2018).
  9. J. Singal et al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 135, 036001 (2023).
  10. M. Gervasi, M. Zannoni, A. Tartari, G. Boella, and G. Sironi, Astrophys. J. 688, 24 (2008).
  11. R. Subrahmanyan and R. Cowsik, Astrophys. J. 776, 42 (2013).
  12. G. P. Holder, Astrophys. J. 780, 112 (2014).
  13. A. R. Offringa, J. Singal, S. Heston, S. Horiuchi, and D. M. Lucero, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 509, 114 (2021).
  14. F. J. Cowie, A. R. Offringa, B. K. Gehlot, J. Singal, S. Heston, S. Horiuchi, and D. M. Lucero, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 523, 5034 (2023).
  15. N. Fornengo, R. Lineros, M. Regis, and M. Taoso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 271302 (2011).
  16. A. Ewall-Wice, T. C. Chang, J. Lazio, O. Doré, M. Seiffert, and R. A. Monsalve, Astrophys. J. 868, 63 (2018).
  17. S. Mittal and G. Kulkarni, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510, 4992 (2022).
  18. A. Caputo, H. Liu, S. Mishra-Sharma, M. Pospelov, and J. T. Ruderman, Phys. Rev. D 107, 123033 (2023).
  19. S. K. Acharya and J. Chluba, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 521, 3939 (2023).
  20. S. K. Acharya, J. Dhandha, and J. Chluba, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, 2454 (2022).
  21. A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
  22. T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rep. 67, 183 (1980).
  23. T. W. B. Kibble, J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976).
  24. J. Magueijo and R. H. Brandenberger, in IPM School on Cosmology 1999: Large Scale Structure Formation (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0002030.
  25. A separate set of field theory simulations that attempt to resolve the cosmic string cores have been performed and do not see a long-lived loop distribution [26, 27]. We note that there are significant numerical challenges involved when simulating such a wide range of scales from the string width to the Hubble radius and utilize the loop distributions given from Nambu-Goto simulations in our work.

  26. M. Hindmarsh, S. Stuckey, and N. Bevis, Phys. Rev. D 79, 123504 (2009).
  27. M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, J. Urrestilla, D. Daverio, and M. Kunz, Phys. Rev. D 96, 023525 (2017).
  28. V. Vanchurin, K. D. Olum, and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 74, 063527 (2006).
  29. C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, Phys. Rev. D 73, 043515 (2006).
  30. C. Ringeval, M. Sakellariadou, and F. Bouchet, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2007) 023.
  31. L. Lorenz, C. Ringeval, and M. Sakellariadou, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2010) 003.
  32. J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and B. Shlaer, Phys. Rev. D 89, 023512 (2014).
  33. T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 31, 3052 (1985).
  34. J. Ellis and M. Lewicki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 041304 (2021).
  35. J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and J. M. Wachter, Phys. Rev. D 103, 103512 (2021).
  36. S. F. Bramberger, R. H. Brandenberger, P. Jreidini, and J. Quintin, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2015) 007.
  37. R. Brandenberger, B. Cyr, and H. Jiao, Phys. Rev. D 104, 123501 (2021).
  38. B. Cyr, H. Jiao, and R. Brandenberger, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, 2221 (2022).
  39. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B249, 557 (1985).
  40. J. P. Ostriker, A. C. Thompson, and E. Witten, Phys. Lett. B 180, 231 (1986).
  41. A. Babul, B. Paczynski, and D. Spergel, Astrophys. J. Lett. 316, L49 (1987).
  42. A. Vilenkin and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1041 (1987).
  43. Y.-F. Cai, E. Sabancilar, D. A. Steer, and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 86, 043521 (2012).
  44. H. Tashiro, E. Sabancilar, and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 85, 103522 (2012).
  45. H. Tashiro, E. Sabancilar, and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 85, 123535 (2012).
  46. K. Miyamoto and K. Nakayama, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2013) 012.
  47. R. Brandenberger, B. Cyr, and R. Shi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2019) 009.
  48. B. Cyr, J. Chluba, and S. K. Acharya, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 525, 2632 (2023).
  49. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  50. D. J. Fixsen, E. S. Cheng, J. M. Gales, J. C. Mather, R. A. Shafer, and E. L. Wright, Astrophys. J. 473, 576 (1996).
  51. J. D. Bowman, A. E. E. Rogers, R. A. Monsalve, T. J. Mozdzen, and N. Mahesh, Nature (London) 555, 67 (2018).
  52. A. Kogut et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2011) 025.
  53. A. Kogut, J. Chluba, D. J. Fixsen, S. Meyer, and D. Spergel, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 9904, 99040W (2016).
  54. www.Chluba.de/CosmoTherm.
  55. J. Chluba and R. A. Sunyaev, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 419, 1294 (2012).
  56. J. Chluba, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 4182 (2015).
  57. B. Bolliet, J. Chluba, and R. Battye, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 507, 3148 (2021).
  58. S. K. Acharya, B. Cyr, and J. Chluba, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 523, 1908 (2023).
  59. C. Feng and G. Holder, Astrophys. J. Lett. 858, L17 (2018).
  60. N. Fornengo, R. A. Lineros, M. Regis, and M. Taoso, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2014) 008.
  61. J. A. Rubiño Martín et al., in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 11453 (2020), p. 114530T.
  62. B. Maffei et al., arXiv:2111.00246, 10.1142/9789811269776_0129.
  63. S. Masi et al., arXiv:2110.12254, 10.1142/9789811269776_0131.
  64. J. Chluba et al., Exp. Astron. 51, 1515 (2021).
  65. E. de Lera Acedo et al., Nat. Astron. 6, 984 (2022).
  66. https://www.skao.int/.
  67. Z. Abdurashidova et al. (HERA Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 925, 221 (2022).
  68. Z. Abdurashidova et al. (HERA Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 924, 51 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation