Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Entanglement of purification in random tensor networks

Chris Akers*

Thomas Faulkner† and Simon Lin‡

Pratik Rath§

  • Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

  • Department of Physics, University of Illinois, 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801-3080, USA

  • Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA

  • *cakers@mit.edu
  • †tomf@illinois.edu
  • ‡shanlin3@illinois.edu
  • §rath@ucsb.edu

Phys. Rev. D 109, L101902 – Published 6 May, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L101902

Abstract

The entanglement of purification EP(A∶B) is a powerful correlation measure, but it is notoriously difficult to compute because it involves an optimization over all possible purifications. In this paper, we prove a new inequality: EP(A∶B)≥12SR(2)(A∶B), where SR(n)(A∶B) is the Renyi reflected entropy. Using this, we compute EP(A∶B) for a large class of random tensor networks at large bond dimension and show that it is equal to the entanglement wedge cross section EW(A∶B), proving a previous conjecture motivated from AdS/CFT.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (29)

  1. B. M. Terhal, M. Horodecki, D. W. Leung, and D. P. DiVincenzo, The entanglement of purification, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 43, 4286 (2002).
  2. Exceptions to this include pure states like Bell pairs and classically correlated states like GHZ states; see Ref. [3] for details.

  3. P. Nguyen, T. Devakul, M. G. Halbasch, M. P. Zaletel, and B. Swingle, Entanglement of purification: From spin chains to holography, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2018) 098.
  4. See Ref. [5] for a review of the quantum information perspective on AdS/CFT.

  5. D. Harlow, TASI lectures on the emergence of bulk physics in AdS/CFT, Proc. Sci. TASI2017 (2018) 002 [arXiv:1802.01040].
  6. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 181602 (2006).
  7. X. Dong, D. Harlow, and A. C. Wall, Reconstruction of bulk operators within the entanglement wedge in gauge-gravity duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 021601 (2016).
  8. T. Takayanagi and K. Umemoto, Entanglement of purification through holographic duality, Nat. Phys. 14, 573 (2018).
  9. X. Dong, X.-L. Qi, and M. Walter, Holographic entanglement negativity and replica symmetry breaking, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 024.
  10. C. Akers and G. Penington, Leading order corrections to the quantum extremal surface prescription, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 062.
  11. C. Akers, T. Faulkner, S. Lin, and P. Rath, Reflected entropy in random tensor networks, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 162.
  12. C. Akers, T. Faulkner, S. Lin, and P. Rath, Reflected entropy in random tensor networks. Part II. A topological index from canonical purification, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 067.
  13. C. Akers, T. Faulkner, S. Lin, and P. Rath, Reflected entropy in random tensor networks III: Triway cuts.
  14. C. Akers and P. Rath, Holographic Renyi entropy from quantum error correction, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 052.
  15. X. Dong, D. Harlow, and D. Marolf, Flat entanglement spectra in fixed-area states of quantum gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 240.
  16. X. Dong and D. Marolf, One-loop universality of holographic codes, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 191.
  17. X. Dong, D. Marolf, P. Rath, A. Tajdini, and Z. Wang, The spacetime geometry of fixed-area states in gravitational systems, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 158.
  18. S. Dutta and T. Faulkner, A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 178.
  19. See Ref. [20] for a review.

  20. E. Witten, APS medal for exceptional achievement in research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045003 (2018).
  21. |ψ⟩ does not need to be cyclic and separating.

  22. P. Hayden, M. Lemm, and J. Sorce, Reflected entropy is not a correlation measure, Phys. Rev. A 107, L050401 (2023).
  23. P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter, and Z. Yang, Holographic duality from random tensor networks, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 009.
  24. logD∼14GN in AdS/CFT in units where lAdS=1.

  25. N. Cheng, C. Lancien, G. Penington, M. Walter, and F. Witteveen, Random tensor networks with nontrivial links, Ann. Henri Poincare 25, 2107 (2024).
  26. G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 205.
  27. C. Akers, T. Faulkner, S. Lin, and P. Rath, The page curve for reflected entropy, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2022) 089.
  28. J. Hauschild, E. Leviatan, J. H. Bardarson, E. Altman, M. P. Zaletel, and F. Pollmann, Finding purifications with minimal entanglement, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235163 (2018).
  29. T. Faulkner, M. Li, and H. Wang, A modular toolkit for bulk reconstruction, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 119.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation