Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Far-from-equilibrium slow modes and momentum anisotropy in an expanding plasma

Jasmine Brewer1,2,*, Weiyao Ke3,6, Li Yan4, and Yi Yin5,†

  • 1Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland
  • 2Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom
  • 3Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 4Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Handan Road 220, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China
  • 5Quark Matter Research Center, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • 6Key Laboratory of Quark and Lepton Physics (MOE) & Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

  • *Corresponding author: jasmine.brewer@physics.ox.ac.uk
  • †yiyin@impcas.ac.cn

Phys. Rev. D 109, L091504 – Published 28 May, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L091504

Abstract

The momentum distribution of particle production in heavy-ion collisions encodes information about thermalization processes in the early-stage quark-gluon plasma. We use kinetic theory to study the far-from-equilibrium evolution of an expanding plasma with an anisotropic momentum-space distribution. We identify slow and fast degrees of freedom in the far-from-equilibrium plasma from the evolution of moments of this distribution. At late times, the slow modes correspond to hydrodynamic degrees of freedom and are naturally gapped from the fast modes by the inverse of the relaxation time, τR−1. At early times, however, there are an infinite number of slow modes with a gap inversely proportional to time, τ−1. From the evolution of the slow modes we generalize the paradigm of the far-from-equilibrium attractor to vector and tensor components of the energy-momentum tensor, and even to higher moments of the distribution function that are not part of the hydrodynamic evolution. We predict that initial-state momentum anisotropy decays slowly in the far-from-equilibrium phase and may persist until the relaxation time.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (52)

  1. J. Berges, A. Rothkopf, and J. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 041603 (2008).
  2. H. M. Jaeger and A. J. Liu, arXiv:1009.4874.
  3. T. Brauner, S. A. Hartnoll, P. Kovtun, H. Liu, M. Mezei, A. Nicolis, R. Penco, S.-H. Shao, and D. T. Son, in 2022 Snowmass Summer Study (2022); arXiv:2203.10110.
  4. J. Berges, M. P. Heller, A. Mazeliauskas, and R. Venugopalan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035003 (2021).
  5. P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2019), ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat], [Amazon][WorldCat].
  6. M. Spaliński, Acta Phys. Pol. B Proc. Suppl. 16, 1 (2023).
  7. C. Shen and L. Yan, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 122 (2020).
  8. J. Brewer, A. Mazeliauskas, and W. van der Schee, in Opportunities of OO and pO collisions at the LHC (2021); arXiv:2103.01939.
  9. P. M. Chesler and L. G. Yaffe, Phys. Rev. D 82, 026006 (2010).
  10. M. P. Heller, R. A. Janik, and P. Witaszczyk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 201602 (2012).
  11. P. M. Chesler and L. G. Yaffe, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2015) 070.
  12. P. M. Chesler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 241602 (2015).
  13. J. Casalderrey-Solana, M. P. Heller, D. Mateos, and W. van der Schee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 221602 (2014).
  14. J. Casalderrey-Solana, M. P. Heller, D. Mateos, and W. van der Schee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 181601 (2013).
  15. L. Keegan, A. Kurkela, P. Romatschke, W. van der Schee, and Y. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2016) 031.
  16. M. Martinez and M. Strickland, Nucl. Phys. A848, 183 (2010).
  17. W. Florkowski and R. Ryblewski, Phys. Rev. C 83, 034907 (2011).
  18. M. Alqahtani, M. Nopoush, and M. Strickland, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 101, 204 (2018).
  19. M. P. Heller and M. Spalinski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072501 (2015).
  20. M. P. Heller, A. Kurkela, M. Spaliński, and V. Svensson, Phys. Rev. D 97, 091503 (2018).
  21. W. Florkowski, M. P. Heller, and M. Spalinski, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 046001 (2018).
  22. P. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 012301 (2018).
  23. M. Spaliński, Phys. Lett. B 776, 468 (2018).
  24. P. Romatschke, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2017) 079.
  25. A. Behtash, C. N. Cruz-Camacho, and M. Martinez, Phys. Rev. D 97, 044041 (2018).
  26. M. Strickland, J. Noronha, and G. Denicol, Phys. Rev. D 97, 036020 (2018).
  27. A. Behtash, C. N. Cruz-Camacho, S. Kamata, and M. Martinez, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134914 (2019).
  28. M. Strickland, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2018) 128.
  29. M. P. Heller and V. Svensson, Phys. Rev. D 98, 054016 (2018).
  30. J.-P. Blaizot and L. Yan, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 412, 167993 (2020).
  31. A. Kurkela, W. van der Schee, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 102301 (2020).
  32. M. Strickland and U. Tantary, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 069.
  33. M. P. Heller, R. Jefferson, M. Spaliński, and V. Svensson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 132301 (2020).
  34. D. Almaalol, A. Kurkela, and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 122302 (2020).
  35. H. Alalawi and M. Strickland, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2022) 143.
  36. J. Brewer, L. Yan, and Y. Yin, Phys. Lett. B 816, 136189 (2021).
  37. J. Brewer, B. Scheihing-Hitschfeld, and Y. Yin, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 145.
  38. A. Dumitru, F. Gelis, L. McLerran, and R. Venugopalan, Nucl. Phys. A810, 91 (2008).
  39. K. Dusling, W. Li, and B. Schenke, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 25, 1630002 (2016).
  40. S. Schlichting and P. Tribedy, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2016, 8460349 (2016).
  41. B. Schenke, C. Shen, and P. Tribedy, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135322 (2020).
  42. M. Greif, C. Greiner, B. Schenke, S. Schlichting, and Z. Xu, Phys. Rev. D 96, 091504 (2017).
  43. M. Nie, L. Yi, G. Ma, and J. Jia, Phys. Rev. C 100, 064905 (2019).
  44. D. Liyanage, D. Everett, C. Chattopadhyay, and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C 105, 064908 (2022).
  45. A. Kurkela, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 965 (2019).
  46. A. A. Abrikosov and I. M. Khalatnikov, Rep. Prog. Phys. 22, 329 (1959).
  47. G. S. Rocha, G. S. Denicol, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 042301 (2021).
  48. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L091504, which provides the explicit form of the evolution equations entering Eq. (4), in addition to details on the ground state in the free streaming limit, the derivation of Eq. (5), and additional results on the evolution of momentum-space triangularity.
  49. J.-Y. Ollitrault, Eur. J. Phys. 29, 275 (2008).
  50. J. Churchill, L. Yan, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C 103, 024904 (2021).
  51. L. V. Delacretaz, Y.-H. Du, U. Mehta, and D. T. Son, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033131 (2022).
  52. D. T. Son, arXiv:1907.07187.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation