Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Intrinsic charm quark valence distribution of the proton

Richard D. Ball1, Alessandro Candido2,3, Juan Cruz-Martinez3, Stefano Forte2, Tommaso Giani4,5, Felix Hekhorn2,6,7, Giacomo Magni4,5, Emanuele R. Nocera8, Juan Rojo4,5 et al. (NNPDF Collaboration)

Juan Rojo4,5 and Roy Stegeman1 (NNPDF Collaboration)

  • 1The Higgs Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Edinburgh, JCMB, KB, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, Scotland
  • 2Tif Lab, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano and INFN, Sezione di Milano, Via Celoria 16, I-20133 Milano, Italy
  • 3CERN, Theoretical Physics Department, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • 5Nikhef Theory Group, Science Park 105, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • 6University of Jyväskylä, Department of Physics, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland
  • 7Helsinki Institute of Physics, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • 8Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Torino and INFN, Sezione di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 1, I-10125 Torino, Italy

Phys. Rev. D 109, L091501 – Published 1 May, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L091501

Abstract

We provide a first quantitative indication that the wave function of the proton contains unequal distributions of charm quarks and antiquarks, i.e., a nonvanishing intrinsic valence charm distribution. A significant nonvanishing valence component cannot be perturbatively generated; hence, our results reinforce previous evidence that the proton contains an intrinsic (i.e., not radiatively generated) charm quark component. We establish our result through a determination of the parton distribution functions of charm quarks and antiquarks in the proton. We propose two novel experimental probes of this intrinsic charm valence component: D-meson asymmetries in Z+c-jet production at the LHCb experiment and flavor-tagged structure functions at the Electron-Ion Collider.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (48)

  1. S. J. Brodsky, P. Hoyer, C. Peterson, and N. Sakai, The intrinsic charm of the proton, Phys. Lett. B 93, 451 (1980).
  2. S. J. Brodsky, A. Kusina, F. Lyonnet, I. Schienbein, H. Spiesberger, and R. Vogt, A review of the intrinsic heavy quark content of the nucleon, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015, 231547 (2015).
  3. P. Jimenez-Delgado, T. Hobbs, J. Londergan, and W. Melnitchouk, New limits on intrinsic charm in the nucleon from global analysis of parton distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 082002 (2015).
  4. R. D. Ball, V. Bertone, M. Bonvini, S. Carrazza, S. Forte, A. Guffanti, N. P. Hartland, J. Rojo, and L. Rottoli (NNPDF Collaboration), A determination of the charm content of the proton, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 647 (2016).
  5. M. Guzzi, T. J. Hobbs, K. Xie, J. Huston, P. Nadolsky, and C. P. Yuan, The persistent nonperturbative charm enigma, Phys. Lett. B 843, 137975 (2023).
  6. T.-J. Hou, S. Dulat, J. Gao, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, P. Nadolsky, C. Schmidt, J. Winter, K. Xie, and C. P. Yuan, CT14 intrinsic charm parton distribution functions from CTEQ-TEA global analysis, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 059.
  7. R. D. Ball et al. (NNPDF Collaboration), An open-source machine learning framework for global analyses of parton distributions, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 958 (2021).
  8. R. D. Ball et al. (NNPDF Collaboration), The path to proton structure at 1% accuracy, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 428 (2022).
  9. R. D. Ball, A. Candido, J. Cruz-Martinez, S. Forte, T. Giani, F. Hekhorn, K. Kudashkin, G. Magni, and J. Rojo (NNPDF Collaboration), Evidence for intrinsic charm quarks in the proton, Nature (London) 608, 483 (2022).
  10. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Study of Z bosons produced in association with charm in the forward region, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 082001 (2022).
  11. S. Catani, D. de Florian, G. Rodrigo, and W. Vogelsang, Perturbative generation of a strange-quark asymmetry in the nucleon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 152003 (2004).
  12. T. J. Hobbs, J. T. Londergan, and W. Melnitchouk, Phenomenology of nonperturbative charm in the nucleon, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074008 (2014).
  13. R. S. Sufian, T. Liu, A. Alexandru, S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de Téramond, H. G. Dosch, T. Draper, K.-F. Liu, and Y.-B. Yang, Constraints on charm-anticharm asymmetry in the nucleon from lattice QCD, Phys. Lett. B 808, 135633 (2020).
  14. T. Boettcher, P. Ilten, and M. Williams, Direct probe of the intrinsic charm content of the proton, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074008 (2016).
  15. M. Kelsey, R. Cruz-Torres, X. Dong, Y. Ji, S. Radhakrishnan, and E. Sichtermann, Constraints on gluon distribution functions in the nucleon and nucleus from open charm hadron production at the Electron-Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054002 (2021).
  16. R. Abdul Khalek et al., Science requirements and detector concepts for the electron-ion collider: EIC Yellow Report, Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022).
  17. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L091501 for details on the fit quality, on the dependence of results upon the parametrization basis, the value of mc, the input dataset and the kinematic cuts in W2 and Q2, and on projected uncertainties for the Z+charm asymmetry data at LHCb and for the charm structure-function data at the EIC.
  18. A. Candido, S. Forte, and F. Hekhorn, Can MS¯ parton distributions be negative?, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 129.
  19. J. Collins, T. C. Rogers, and N. Sato, Positivity and renormalization of parton densities, Phys. Rev. D 105, 076010 (2022).
  20. A. Candido, S. Forte, T. Giani, and F. Hekhorn, On the positivity of MSbar parton distributions, arXiv:2308.00025.
  21. M. Buza and W. L. van Neerven, O(αs2) contributions to charm production in charged-current deep-inelastic lepton hadron scattering, Nucl. Phys. B500, 301 (1997).
  22. I. Bierenbaum, J. Blümlein, and S. Klein, The gluonic operator matrix elements at O(αs2) for DIS heavy flavor production, Phys. Lett. B 672, 401 (2009).
  23. I. Bierenbaum, J. Blümlein, and S. Klein, Mellin moments of the O(αs3) heavy flavor contributions to unpolarized deep-inelastic scattering at Q2≫m2 and anomalous dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B820, 417 (2009).
  24. J. Ablinger, J. Blümlein, S. Klein, C. Schneider, and F. Wissbrock, The O(αs3) massive operator matrix elements of O(nf) for the structure function F2(x,Q2) and transversity, Nucl. Phys. B844, 26 (2011).
  25. J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Blümlein, A. De Freitas, A. Hasselhuhn, A. von Manteuffel, M. Round, C. Schneider, and F. Wißbrock, The 3-loop non-singlet heavy flavor contributions and anomalous dimensions for the structure function F2(x,Q2) and transversity, Nucl. Phys. B886, 733 (2014).
  26. J. Ablinger, J. Blümlein, A. De Freitas, A. Hasselhuhn, A. von Manteuffel, M. Round, and C. Schneider, The O(αs3TF2) contributions to the gluonic operator matrix element, Nucl. Phys. B885, 280 (2014).
  27. A. Behring, I. Bierenbaum, J. Blümlein, A. De Freitas, S. Klein, and F. Wißbrock, The logarithmic contributions to the O(αs3) asymptotic massive Wilson coefficients and operator matrix elements in deeply inelastic scattering, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 3033 (2014).
  28. J. Ablinger, J. Blümlein, A. De Freitas, A. Hasselhuhn, A. von Manteuffel, M. Round, C. Schneider, and F. Wißbrock, The transition matrix element agq(n) of the variable flavor number scheme at o(αs3), Nucl. Phys. B882, 263 (2014).
  29. J. Ablinger, A. Behring, J. Blümlein, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel et al., The 3-loop pure singlet heavy flavor contributions to the structure function F2(x,Q2) and the anomalous dimension, Nucl. Phys. B890, 48 (2014).
  30. J. Blümlein, J. Ablinger, A. Behring, A. De Freitas, A. von Manteuffel, C. Schneider, and C. Schneider, Heavy flavor Wilson coefficients in deep-inelastic scattering: Recent results, Proc. Sci. QCDEV2017 (2017) 031.
  31. J. J. Aubert et al. (European Muon Collaboration), Production of charmed particles in 250-GeV μ+-iron interactions, Nucl. Phys. B213, 31 (1983).
  32. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H.-S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  33. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, A brief introduction to pythia8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008).
  34. P. Skands, S. Carrazza, and J. Rojo, Tuning pythia8.1: The Monash 2013 Tune, Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 74, 3024 (2014).
  35. R. Gauld, U. Haisch, B. D. Pecjak, and E. Re, Beauty-quark and charm-quark pair production asymmetries at LHCb, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034007 (2015).
  36. R. Gauld, U. Haisch, and B. D. Pecjak, Asymmetric heavy-quark hadroproduction at LHCb: Predictions and applications, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 166.
  37. S. Forte, E. Laenen, P. Nason, and J. Rojo, Heavy quarks in deep-inelastic scattering, Nucl. Phys. B834, 116 (2010).
  38. R. D. Ball, M. Bonvini, and L. Rottoli, Charm in deep-inelastic scattering, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2015) 122.
  39. H. Abramowicz et al. (H1, ZEUS Collaborations), Combination and QCD analysis of charm and beauty production cross-section measurements in deep inelastic ep scattering at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 473 (2018).
  40. R. A. Khalek, J. J. Ethier, E. R. Nocera, and J. Rojo, Self-consistent determination of proton and nuclear PDFs at the Electron Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. D 103, 096005 (2021).
  41. N. Armesto, T. Cridge, F. Giuli, L. Harland-Lang, P. Newman, B. Schmookler, R. Thorne, and K. Wichmann, Impact of inclusive electron ion collider data on collinear parton distributions, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054019 (2024).
  42. A. Candido, A. Garcia, G. Magni, T. Rabemananjara, J. Rojo, and R. Stegeman, Neutrino structure functions from GeV to EeV energies, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 149.
  43. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Open charm production and asymmetry in pNe collisions at sNN=68.5  GeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 541 (2023).
  44. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), First measurement of charm production in its fixed-target configuration at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 132002 (2019).
  45. H. Abreu et al. (FASER Collaboration), First direct observation of collider neutrinos with FASER at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 031801 (2023).
  46. R. Albanese et al. (SND@LHC Collaboration), Observation of collider muon neutrinos with the SND@LHC experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 031802 (2023).
  47. J. L. Feng et al., The forward physics facility at the high-luminosity LHC, J. Phys. G 50, 030501 (2023).
  48. J. M. Cruz-Martinez, M. Fieg, T. Giani, P. Krack, T. Mäkelä, T. Rabemananjara, and J. Rojo, The LHC as a neutrino-ion collider, arXiv:2309.09581.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation