- Letter
- Open Access
Entanglement suppression, enhanced symmetry, and a standard-model-like Higgs boson
Phys. Rev. D 109, L051901 – Published 14 March, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L051901
Abstract
We study information-theoretic properties of scalar models containing two Higgs doublets , where , 2 is the flavor quantum number. Considering the 2-to-2 scattering as a two-qubit system in the flavor subspace and the -matrix as a quantum logic gate, we analyze the entanglement power of the -matrix at the tree level, in the limit the gauge coupling is turned off. Demanding the suppression of flavor entanglement during the scattering, the perturbative -matrix in the broken phase can only be in the equivalent class of the Identity gate and the scalar potential exhibits a maximally enhanced symmetry acting on the eight real components of the two doublets. The symmetry leads to the alignment limit naturally, giving rise to a Standard-Model-like Higgs boson as a consequence of entanglement suppression.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
Supplemental Material
References (36)
- J. A. Wheeler, in Proceedings III International Symposium on Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1989), pp. 354–358.
- S. R. Beane, D. B. Kaplan, N. Klco, and M. J. Savage, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 102001 (2019).
- I. Low and T. Mehen, Phys. Rev. D 104, 074014 (2021).
- Q. Liu, I. Low, and T. Mehen, Phys. Rev. C 107, 025204 (2023).
- E. P. Wigner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 38, 449 (1952).
- T. Mehen, I. W. Stewart, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 931 (1999).
- T. Mehen, I. W. Stewart, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B 474, 145 (2000).
- Y. Nishida and D. T. Son, Phys. Rev. D 76, 086004 (2007).
- D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B 424, 390 (1998).
- D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B534, 329 (1998).
- ATLAS Collaboration, Nature (London) 607, 52 (2022); ATLAS Collaboration 612, E24 (2022).
- A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Nature (London) 607, 60 (2022).
- J. F. Gunion and H. E. Haber, Phys. Rev. D 67, 075019 (2003).
- M. Carena, I. Low, N. R. Shah, and C. E. M. Wagner, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 015.
- M. Carena, H. E. Haber, I. Low, N. R. Shah, and C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 91, 035003 (2015).
- M. Carena, H. E. Haber, I. Low, N. R. Shah, and C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 93, 035013 (2016).
- I. Low, N. R. Shah, and X.-P. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 105, 035009 (2022).
- P. S. Bhupal Dev and A. Pilaftsis, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 024; 11 (2015) 147(E).
- P. S. Bhupal Dev and A. Pilaftsis, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 873, 012008 (2017).
- B. Kraus and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 63, 062309 (2001).
- S. A. Hill and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5022 (1997).
- W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
- P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A 63, 040304(R) (2001).
- A. D. Ballard and Y.-S. Wu, in Cross Disciplinary Advances in Quantum Computing (American Mathematical Society, Oxford, 2011), Chap. Cartan Decomposition and Entangling Power of Braiding Quantum Gates.
- N. Khaneja and S. Glaser, arXiv:quant-ph/0010100.
- J. Zhang, J. Vala, S. Sastry, and K. B. Whaley, Phys. Rev. A 67, 042313 (2003).
- H. E. Haber and R. Hempfling, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4280 (1993).
- M. Carena and H. E. Haber, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 50, 63 (2003).
- G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, Phys. Rep. 516, 1 (2012).
- F. J. Botella and J. P. Silva, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3870 (1995).
- A. Cervera-Lierta, J. I. Latorre, J. Rojo, and L. Rottoli, SciPost Phys. 3, 036 (2017).
- G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. C 108, L031002 (2023).
- D. Bai, Phys. Lett. B 845, 138162 (2023).
- R. Aoude, M.-Z. Chung, Y.-t. Huang, C. S. Machado, and M.-K. Tam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 181602 (2020).
- See Supplemental Materials at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L051901 for computational details.
- H. Bahl, M. Carena, N. M. Coyle, A. Ireland, and C. E. M. Wagner, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 165.