- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Sea-quark loop contributions to the d¯−u¯ asymmetry in the proton

Derek B. Leinweber and Anthony W. Thomas

  • Centre for the Subatomic Structure of Matter (CSSM), Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 109, L031503 – Published 5 February, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L031503

Abstract

QCD interactions for equal-mass fermion flavors are flavor blind. This fact is often used to state that disconnected sea-quark loop contributions are equal for u and d quarks in the mass symmetric case and therefore these disconnected sea-quark loop contributions cannot contribute to the well-known d¯−u¯ asymmetry in the proton. Instead, it is argued that one must look to the connected sector of lattice QCD correlation functions to find this difference. In this presentation, we note that these statements are true provided unphysical contributions in the sea-quark loop sector are included, contributions from baryons that do not appear in the physical spectrum. To respect the Pauli principle, these unphysical contributions from the disconnected sea-quark loop sector must cancel equally unphysical contributions in the connected sector. The remaining disconnected sea-quark loop contributions no longer have a balance between d¯ and u¯. Upon considering only physically observed baryons in the loop contributions, we illustrate an important contribution from the sea-quark loop sector to d¯−u¯ that enhances the leading connected contribution by 12%.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (44)

  1. F. Gross et al., 50 years of quantum chromodynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1125 (2023).
  2. A. W. Thomas, A limit on the pionic component of the nucleon through SU(3) flavor breaking in the sea, Phys. Lett. 126B, 97 (1983).
  3. A. S. Ito et al., Measurement of the continuum of dimuons produced in high-energy proton-nucleus collisions, Phys. Rev. D 23, 604 (1981).
  4. D. Allasia et al. (New Muon (NMC) Collaboration), Measurement of the neutron and the proton F2 structure function ratio, Phys. Lett. B 249, 366 (1990).
  5. K. Gottfried, Sum rule for high-energy electron-proton scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 1174 (1967).
  6. K. Gottfried and V. F. Weisskopf, Concepts of Particle Physics. Vol. 2 (Oxford University Press, 1986).
  7. J. Dove et al. (SeaQuest Collaboration), The asymmetry of antimatter in the proton, Nature (London) 590, 561 (2021); 604, E26 (2022).
  8. R. S. Towell et al. (NuSea Collaboration), Improved measurement of the d¯/u¯ asymmetry in the nucleon sea, Phys. Rev. D 64, 052002 (2001).
  9. M. Arneodo et al. (New Muon Collaboration), Reevaluation of the Gottfried sum, Phys. Rev. D 50, R1 (1994).
  10. A. W. Thomas, W. Melnitchouk, and F. M. Steffens, Dynamical symmetry breaking in the sea of the nucleon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2892 (2000).
  11. F. He, C.-R. Ji, W. Melnitchouk, Y. Salamu, A. W. Thomas, P. Wang, and X. G. Wang, Helicity-dependent distribution of strange quarks in the proton from nonlocal chiral effective theory, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094007 (2022).
  12. S. Kretzer, F. Olness, J. Pumplin, D. Stump, W.-K. Tung, and M. H. Reno, The parton structure of the nucleon and precision determination of the Weinberg angle in neutrino scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 041802 (2004).
  13. Y. Salamu, C.-R. Ji, W. Melnitchouk, A. W. Thomas, P. Wang, and X. G. Wang, Parton distributions from nonlocal chiral SU(3) effective theory: Flavor asymmetries, Phys. Rev. D 100, 094026 (2019).
  14. X. G. Wang, C.-R. Ji, W. Melnitchouk, Y. Salamu, A. W. Thomas, and P. Wang, Strange quark asymmetry in the proton in chiral effective theory, Phys. Rev. D 94, 094035 (2016).
  15. M. Burkardt, K. S. Hendricks, C.-R. Ji, W. Melnitchouk, and A. W. Thomas, Pion momentum distributions in the nucleon in chiral effective theory, Phys. Rev. D 87, 056009 (2013).
  16. M. Alberg and G. A. Miller, Chiral light front perturbation theory and the flavor dependence of the light-quark nucleon sea, Phys. Rev. C 100, 035205 (2019).
  17. D. Diakonov, V. Petrov, P. Pobylitsa, M. V. Polyakov, and C. Weiss, Nucleon parton distributions at low normalization point in the large Nc limit, Nucl. Phys. B480, 341 (1996).
  18. B. Dressler, K. Goeke, M. V. Polyakov, P. Schweitzer, M. Strikman, and C. Weiss, Polarized anti-quark flavor asymmetry in Drell-Yan pair production, Eur. Phys. J. C 18, 719 (2001).
  19. W. Melnitchouk, A. W. Thomas, and A. I. Signal, Gottfried sum rule and the shape of F2p−F2n, Z. Phys. A 340, 85 (1991).
  20. E. M. Henley and G. A. Miller, Excess of d¯ over u¯ in the proton sea quark distribution, Phys. Lett. B 251, 453 (1990).
  21. A. I. Signal and A. W. Thomas, Possible strength of the nonperturbative strange sea of the nucleon, Phys. Lett. B 191, 205 (1987).
  22. R. D. Ball et al. (NNPDF Collaboration), The path to proton structure at 1% accuracy, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 428 (2022).
  23. R. Abdul Khalek et al., Snowmass 2021 white paper: Electron ion collider for high energy physics, arXiv:2203.13199.
  24. A. W. Thomas, X. G. Wang, and A. G. Williams, Constraints on the dark photon from deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Rev. D 105, L031901 (2022).
  25. R. D. Ball et al. (NNPDF Collaboration), Parton distributions from high-precision collider data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 663 (2017).
  26. X. Zheng, J. Erler, Q. Liu, and H. Spiesberger, Accessing weak neutral-current coupling gAAeq using positron and electron beams at Jefferson Lab, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 173 (2021).
  27. W. Bentz, I. C. Cloet, J. T. Londergan, and A. W. Thomas, Reassessment of the NuTeV determination of the weak mixing angle, Phys. Lett. B 693, 462 (2010).
  28. A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne, and G. Watt, Parton distributions for the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 189 (2009).
  29. W. Detmold, M. Illa, D. J. Murphy, P. Oare, K. Orginos, P. E. Shanahan, M. L. Wagman, and F. Winter (NPLQCD Collaboration), Lattice QCD constraints on the parton distribution functions of He3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 202001 (2021).
  30. P. C. Barry et al. (Jefferson Lab Angular Momentum (JAM) and HadStruc Collaborations), Complementarity of experimental and lattice QCD data on pion parton distributions, Phys. Rev. D 105, 114051 (2022).
  31. T.-J. Hou, M. Yan, J. Liang, K.-F. Liu, and C. P. Yuan, Connected and disconnected sea partons from the CT18 parametrization of PDFs, Phys. Rev. D 106, 096008 (2022).
  32. K.-F. Liu, W.-C. Chang, H.-Y. Cheng, and J.-C. Peng, Connected-sea partons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 252002 (2012).
  33. Y.-j. Zhang, B. Zhang, and B.-Q. Ma, Detailed balance and sea quark flavor asymmetry of proton, Phys. Lett. B 523, 260 (2001).
  34. K.-F. Liu and S.-J. Dong, Origin of difference between d¯ and u¯ partons in the nucleon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1790 (1994).
  35. K.-F. Liu, Parton degrees of freedom from the path integral formalism, Phys. Rev. D 62, 074501 (2000).
  36. D. B. Leinweber, QCD equalities for baryon current matrix elements, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5115 (1996).
  37. C.-R. Ji, W. Melnitchouk, and A. W. Thomas, Anatomy of relativistic pion loop corrections to the electromagnetic nucleon coupling, Phys. Rev. D 88, 076005 (2013).
  38. J.-W. Chen and X.-d. Ji, Is the Sullivan process compatible with QCD chiral dynamics?, Phys. Lett. B 523, 107 (2001).
  39. D. Arndt and M. J. Savage, Chiral corrections to matrix elements of twist-2 operators, Nucl. Phys. A697, 429 (2002).
  40. J. N. Labrenz and S. R. Sharpe, Quenched chiral perturbation theory for baryons, Phys. Rev. D 54, 4595 (1996).
  41. M. J. Savage, The magnetic moments of the octet baryons in quenched chiral perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. A700, 359 (2002).
  42. J.-W. Chen and M. J. Savage, Baryons in partially quenched chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 65, 094001 (2002).
  43. D. B. Leinweber, Quark contributions to baryon magnetic moments in full, quenched and partially quenched QCD, Phys. Rev. D 69, 014005 (2004).
  44. J. M. M. Hall and D. B. Leinweber, Flavor-singlet baryons in the graded symmetry approach to partially quenched QCD, Phys. Rev. D 94, 094004 (2016).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 109, L031503– Published 5 February, 2024
  • Received 13 July 2023
  • Accepted 8 January 2024
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation