- Editors' Suggestion
- Letter
- Open Access
Bell inequality is violated in decays
Phys. Rev. D 109, L031104 – Published 23 February, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L031104
Abstract
The violation of the Bell inequality is one of the hallmarks of quantum mechanics and can be used to rule out local deterministic alternative descriptions. We utilize the data analysis published by the LHCb Collaboration on the helicity amplitudes for the decay to compute the entanglement among the polarizations of the final vector mesons and the violation of the Bell inequality that it entails. We find that quantum entanglement can be detected with a significance well above (nominally ) and Bell inequality is violated with a significance well above (nominally )—thereby firmly establishing these distinguishing feature of quantum mechanics at high energies in a collider setting and in the presence of strong and weak interactions. Entanglement is also present and the Bell inequality is violated in other decays of the mesons into vector mesons, but with lesser significance.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (28)
- J. S. Bell, Phys. Phys. Fiz. 1, 195 (1964); J. S. BellSpeakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1987–2004).
- A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982).
- G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039 (1998).
- R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 052002 (2013).
- B. Hensen, H. Bernien, A. E. Dreau, A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, M. S. Blok, J. Ruitenberg, R. F. L. Vermeulen, R. N. Schouten, C. Abellan et al., Nature (London) 526, 682 (2015).
- C. P. Jessop et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4533 (1997).
- T. Affolder et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4668 (2000).
- R. Itoh et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 091601 (2005).
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 76, 031102 (2007).
- V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 032001 (2009).
- F. Benatti and R. Floreanini, Phys. Rev. D 57, 1332 (1998); Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14, 1519 (1999); Eur. Phys. J. C 13, 267 (2000).
- A. Go (Belle Collaboration), J. Mod. Opt. 51, 991 (2004).
- R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
- A. S. Dighe, I. Dunietz, H. J. Lipkin, and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Lett. B 369, 144 (1996).
- M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1914 (1999).
- A. Yamamoto and H. Suganuma, Phys. Rev. D 79, 054504 (2009).
- K. F. Chen et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 221804 (2005).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 026.
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 171802 (2023).
- G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 342 (2021).
- M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli, and L. Marzola, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 823 (2023).
- M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli, and L. Marzola, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 195.
- D.Collins, N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404 (2002).
- D. Kaszlikowski, L. C. Kwek, J. L. Chen, M. Zukowski, and C. H. Oh, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032118 (2002).
- A. Acin, T. Durt, N. Gisin, and J. I. Latorre, Phys. Rev. A 65, 052325 (2002).
- M. Giustina et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015); L. K. Shalm et al., 115, 250402 (2015).
- W. Rosenfeld, D. Burchardt, R. Garthoff, K. Redeker, N. Ortegel, M. Rau, and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 010402 (2017).