Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Emergent M-theory limit

Ralph Blumenhagen1,2, Niccolò Cribiori1, Aleksandar Gligovic1,2, and Antonia Paraskevopoulou1,3

  • 1Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Boltzmannstrasse 8, 85748 Garching, Germany
  • 2Exzellenzcluster ORIGINS, Boltzmannstrasse 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany
  • 3Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Fakultät für Physik, Theresienstrasse 37, 80333 München, Germany

Phys. Rev. D 109, L021901 – Published 18 January, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L021901

Abstract

It has been recently proposed that at each infinite distance limit in the moduli space of quantum gravity a perturbative description emerges with fundamental degrees of freedom given by those infinite towers of states whose typical mass scale is parametrically not larger than the ultraviolet cutoff, identified with the species scale. This proposal is applied to the familiar ten-dimensional type IIA and IIB superstring theories, when considering the limit of infinite string coupling. For type IIB, the light towers of states are given by excitations of the D1-brane, as expected from self-duality. Instead, for type IIA at strong coupling, which is dual to M-theory on S1, we make the observation that the emergent degrees of freedom are bound states of transversal M2- and M5-branes with Kaluza-Klein momentum along the circle. We speculate on the interpretation of the necessity of including all these states for a putative quantum formulation of M-theory.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (17)

  1. C. Vafa, arXiv:hep-th/0509212.
  2. E. Palti, Fortschr. Phys. 67, 1900037 (2019).
  3. M. van Beest, J. Calderón-Infante, D. Mirfendereski, and I. Valenzuela, Phys. Rep. 989, 1 (2022).
  4. N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang, and C. Vafa, arXiv:2212.06187.
  5. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B443, 85 (1995).
  6. B. de Wit, J. Hoppe, and H. Nicolai, Nucl. Phys. B305, 545 (1988).
  7. W. Taylor, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 419 (2001).
  8. H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B766, 21 (2007).
  9. S. J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 190.
  10. R. Blumenhagen, N. Cribiori, A. Gligovic, and A. Paraskevopoulou, arXiv:2309.11551.
  11. T. W. Grimm, E. Palti, and I. Valenzuela, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 143.
  12. G. Dvali, Fortschr. Phys. 58, 528 (2010).
  13. R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, arXiv:hep-th/9809187.
  14. R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, arXiv:hep-th/9812127.
  15. T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5112 (1997).
  16. I. Mitra and S. Roy, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2001) 026.
  17. L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, and Y. Tachikawa, Lett. Math. Phys. 91, 167 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation