Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Energy loss of a fast moving parton in Gribov-Zwanziger plasma

Manas Debnath1,*, Ritesh Ghosh2,†, Mohammad Yousuf Jamal3,‡, Manu Kurian4,§, and Jai Prakash3,∥

  • 1School of Physical Sciences, National Institute of Science Education and Research, An OCC of Homi Bhabha National Institute, Jatni, Khurda 752050, India
  • 2College of Integrative Sciences and Arts, Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona 85212, USA
  • 3School of Physical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Goa, Ponda 403401, Goa, India
  • 4RIKEN BNL Research Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA

  • *manas.debnath@niser.ac.in
  • †riteshghosh1994@gmail.com
  • ‡mohammad@iitgoa.ac.in
  • §mkurian@bnl.gov
  • ∥jai183212001@iitgoa.ac.in

Phys. Rev. D 109, L011503 – Published 25 January, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L011503

Abstract

The Gribov-Zwanziger prescription applied within Yang-Mills theory is demonstrated to be an efficient method for refining the theory’s infrared dynamics. We study the collisional energy loss experienced by a high-energetic test parton as it traverses through the Grivov plasma at finite temperature. To achieve this, we employ a semiclassical approach that considers the parton’s energy loss while accounting for the backreaction induced by the polarization effects due to its motion in the medium. The polarization tensor of the medium is estimated within a nonperturbative resummation considering the Gribov-Zwanziger approach. The modification of the gluon and ghost loops due to the presence of the Gribov parameter plays a vital role in our estimation. We observe that the nonperturbative interactions have a sizable effect on the parton energy loss. Further, we discuss the implications of our findings in the context of relativistic heavy-ion collisions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Impact of the chiral asymmetry and a magnetic field on the passage of an energetic test parton in a QCD medium

Ritesh Ghosh, Mohammad Yousuf Jamal, and Manu Kurian
Phys. Rev. D 108, 054035 (2023)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (55)

  1. P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 172301 (2007).
  2. S. Ryu, J. F. Paquet, C. Shen, G. S. Denicol, B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 132301 (2015).
  3. H. van Hees, V. Greco, and R. Rapp, Phys. Rev. C 73, 034913 (2006).
  4. S. Cao et al. (JETSCAPE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 96, 024909 (2017).
  5. S. K. Das, J.-e. Alam, and P. Mohanty, Phys. Rev. C 80, 054916 (2009).
  6. S. Cao et al., Phys. Rev. C 99, 054907 (2019).
  7. T. Song, P. Moreau, Y. Xu, V. Ozvenchuk, E. Bratkovskaya, J. Aichelin, S. A. Bass, P. B. Gossiaux, and M. Nahrgang, Phys. Rev. C 101, 044903 (2020).
  8. M. Singh, M. Kurian, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C 108, 054901 (2023).
  9. A. Dumitru, Y. Nara, B. Schenke, and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. C 78, 024909 (2008).
  10. M. E. Carrington, K. Deja, and S. Mrowczynski, Phys. Rev. C 92, 044914 (2015).
  11. J. Prakash, M. Kurian, S. K. Das, and V. Chandra, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094009 (2021).
  12. J. Prakash, V. Chandra, and S. K. Das, Phys. Rev. D 108, 096016 (2023).
  13. M. Kurian, S. K. Das, and V. Chandra, Phys. Rev. D 100, 074003 (2019).
  14. S. Hauksson, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C 105, 014914 (2022).
  15. A. Shaikh, M. Kurian, S. K. Das, V. Chandra, S. Dash, and B. K. Nandi, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034017 (2021).
  16. M. Ruggieri, Pooja, J. Prakash, and S. K. Das, Phys. Rev. D 106, 034032 (2022).
  17. M. E. Carrington, A. Czajka, and S. Mrowczynski, Phys. Rev. C 105, 064910 (2022).
  18. R. Ghosh, M. Y. Jamal, and M. Kurian, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054035 (2023).
  19. J. Prakash and M. Y. Jamal, J. Phys. G 51, 025101 (2023).
  20. S. Carignano and C. Manuel, Phys. Rev. D 103, 116002 (2021).
  21. M. E. Carrington, S. Mrówczyński, and B. Schenke, Phys. Rev. C 95, 024906 (2017).
  22. X. Dong, Y.-J. Lee, and R. Rapp, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 417 (2019).
  23. S. Madni, A. Mukherjee, A. Bandyopadhyay, and N. Haque, Phys. Lett. B 838, 137714 (2023).
  24. V. N. Gribov, Nucl. Phys. B139, 1 (1978).
  25. D. Zwanziger, Nucl. Phys. B323, 513 (1989).
  26. N. Vandersickel and D. Zwanziger, Phys. Rep. 520, 175 (2012).
  27. D. Dudal, J. A. Gracey, S. P. Sorella, N. Vandersickel, and H. Verschelde, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065047 (2008).
  28. M. A. L. Capri, D. Dudal, D. Fiorentini, M. S. Guimaraes, I. F. Justo, A. D. Pereira, B. W. Mintz, L. F. Palhares, R. F. Sobreiro, and S. P. Sorella, Phys. Rev. D 94, 025035 (2016).
  29. E. Gotsman, Y. Ivanov, and E. Levin, Phys. Rev. D 103, 096017 (2021).
  30. I. F. Justo, A. D. Pereira, and R. F. Sobreiro, Phys. Rev. D 106, 025015 (2022).
  31. F. Canfora, P. Pais, and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2855 (2014).
  32. K. Fukushima and N. Su, Phys. Rev. D 88, 076008 (2013).
  33. W. Wu, G. Huang, J. Zhao, and P. Zhuang, Phys. Rev. D 107, 114033 (2023).
  34. M. Golterman, J. Greensite, S. Peris, and A. P. Szczepaniak, Phys. Rev. D 85, 085016 (2012).
  35. A. Bandyopadhyay, N. Haque, M. G. Mustafa, and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D 93, 065004 (2016).
  36. N. Su and K. Tywoniuk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 161601 (2015).
  37. Sumit, N. Haque, and B. K. Patra, Phys. Lett. B 845, 138143 (2023).
  38. M. Debnath, R. Ghosh, and N. Haque, arXiv:2305.16250.
  39. A. Bandyopadhyay, arXiv:2307.09656.
  40. S. K. Wong, Nuovo Cimento A 65, 689 (1970).
  41. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L011503 for the description of the tadpole diagram, gluon loop, and ghost loop contributions to gluon self-energy within Gribov-Zwanziger prescription.
  42. F. Scardina, S. K. Das, V. Minissale, S. Plumari, and V. Greco, Phys. Rev. C 96, 044905 (2017).
  43. G. D. Moore and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. C 71, 064904 (2005).
  44. A. Beraudo et al., Nucl. Phys. A979, 21 (2018).
  45. S. K. Das, F. Scardina, S. Plumari, and V. Greco, Phys. Rev. C 90, 044901 (2014).
  46. S. Mazumder, T. Bhattacharyya, and J.-e. Alam, Phys. Rev. D 89, 014002 (2014).
  47. D. B. Walton and J. Rafelski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 31 (2000).
  48. P. Romatschke and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. D 68, 036004 (2003).
  49. M. Y. Jamal, S. Mitra, and V. Chandra, Phys. Rev. D 95, 094022 (2017).
  50. M. Kurian, M. Singh, V. Chandra, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C 102, 044907 (2020).
  51. M. Cacciari, P. Nason, and R. Vogt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 122001 (2005).
  52. M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, N. Houdeau, M. L. Mangano, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2012) 137.
  53. A. Jaiswal and N. Haque, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135936 (2020).
  54. P. Chakraborty, M. G. Mustafa, and M. H. Thoma, Phys. Rev. C 75, 064908 (2007).
  55. M. Y. Jamal, S. K. Das, and M. Ruggieri, Phys. Rev. D 103, 054030 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation