Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Neff in the Standard Model at NLO is 3.043

Mattia Cielo1,*, Miguel Escudero2,†, Gianpiero Mangano1,‡, and Ofelia Pisanti1,§

  • 1Dipartimento di Fisica E. Pancini, Naples, and INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Monte S. Angelo I-80126 Naples, Italy
  • 2Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland

  • *mattia.cielo@unina.it
  • †miguel.escudero@cern.ch
  • ‡gmangano@na.infn.it
  • §pisanti@na.infn.it

Phys. Rev. D 108, L121301 – Published 13 December, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L121301

Abstract

The effective number of relativistic neutrino species is a fundamental probe of the early Universe, and its measurement represents a key constraint on many scenarios beyond the Standard Model of Particle Physics. In light of this, an accurate prediction of Neff in the Standard Model is of pivotal importance. In this work, we consider the last ingredient needed to accurately calculate NeffSM: standard zero and finite-temperature QED corrections to e+e−↔νν¯ interaction rates during neutrino decoupling at temperatures around T∼MeV. We find that this effect leads to a reduction of −0.0007 in NeffSM. This next-to-leading-order QED correction to the interaction rates, together with finite-temperature QED corrections to the electromagnetic density of the plasma, and the effect of neutrino oscillations, implies that NeffSM=3.043 with a theoretical uncertainty that is much smaller than any projected observational sensitivity.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (63)

  1. R. Allahverdi et al., Open J. Astrophys. 4 (2021).
  2. R. Barbieri and A. Dolgov, Nucl. Phys. B349, 743 (1991).
  3. S. Gariazzo, P. F. de Salas, and S. Pastor, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2019) 014.
  4. Z. Berezhiani, D. Comelli, and F. L. Villante, Phys. Lett. B 503, 362 (2001).
  5. C. Brust, D. E. Kaplan, and M. T. Walters, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2013) 058.
  6. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 241301 (2013).
  7. F. D’Eramo, F. Hajkarim, and S. Yun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 152001 (2022).
  8. A. Notari, F. Rompineve, and G. Villadoro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 011004 (2023).
  9. L. Di Luzio, J. M. Camalich, G. Martinelli, J. A. Oller, and G. Piazza, Phys. Rev. D 108, 035025 (2023).
  10. F. D’Eramo, E. Di Valentino, W. Giarè, F. Hajkarim, A. Melchiorri, O. Mena, F. Renzi, and S. Yun, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2022) 022.
  11. M. Escudero and M. Fairbairn, Phys. Rev. D 100, 103531 (2019).
  12. C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 163001 (2018).
  13. G. F. Giudice, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D 64, 023508 (2001).
  14. P. F. de Salas, M. Lattanzi, G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, and O. Pisanti, Phys. Rev. D 92, 123534 (2015).
  15. T. Hasegawa, N. Hiroshima, K. Kohri, R. S. L. Hansen, T. Tram, and S. Hannestad, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2019) 012.
  16. E. W. Kolb, M. S. Turner, and T. P. Walker, Phys. Rev. D 34, 2197 (1986).
  17. N. Sabti, J. Alvey, M. Escudero, M. Fairbairn, and D. Blas, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2020) 004.
  18. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  19. L. Balkenhol et al. (SPT-3G Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 104, 083509 (2021).
  20. S. Aiola et al. (ACT Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2020) 047.
  21. P. Ade et al. (Simons Observatory Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2019) 056.
  22. K. N. Abazajian et al. (CMB-S4 Collaboration), arXiv:1610.02743.
  23. K. Abazajian et al., arXiv:1907.04473.
  24. N. Sehgal et al., arXiv:2002.12714.
  25. D. A. Dicus, E. W. Kolb, A. M. Gleeson, E. C. G. Sudarshan, V. L. Teplitz, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 26, 2694 (1982).
  26. N. C. Rana and B. M. Seifert, Phys. Rev. D 44, 393 (1991).
  27. S. Dodelson and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 46, 3372 (1992).
  28. A. D. Dolgov and M. Fukugita, Phys. Rev. D 46, 5378 (1992).
  29. S. Hannestad and J. Madsen, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1764 (1995).
  30. A. D. Dolgov, S. H. Hansen, and D. V. Semikoz, Nucl. Phys. B503, 426 (1997).
  31. A. D. Dolgov, S. H. Hansen, and D. V. Semikoz, Nucl. Phys. B543, 269 (1999).
  32. N. Y. Gnedin and O. Y. Gnedin, Astrophys. J. 509, 11 (1998).
  33. S. Esposito, G. Miele, S. Pastor, M. Peloso, and O. Pisanti, Nucl. Phys. B590, 539 (2000).
  34. G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, and M. Peloso, Phys. Lett. B 534, 8 (2002).
  35. G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, T. Pinto, O. Pisanti, and P. D. Serpico, Nucl. Phys. B729, 221 (2005).
  36. J. Birrell, C.-T. Yang, and J. Rafelski, Nucl. Phys. B890, 481 (2014).
  37. E. Grohs, G. M. Fuller, C. T. Kishimoto, M. W. Paris, and A. Vlasenko, Phys. Rev. D 93, 083522 (2016).
  38. P. F. de Salas and S. Pastor, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2016) 051.
  39. J. Froustey and C. Pitrou, Phys. Rev. D 101, 043524 (2020).
  40. J. J. Bennett, G. Buldgen, M. Drewes, and Y. Y. Y. Wong, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2020) 003; 03 (2021) A01.
  41. M. Escudero, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2019) 007.
  42. M. Escudero Abenza, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2020) 048.
  43. K. Akita and M. Yamaguchi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2020) 012.
  44. J. Froustey, C. Pitrou, and M. C. Volpe, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2020) 015.
  45. J. J. Bennett, G. Buldgen, P. F. De Salas, M. Drewes, S. Gariazzo, S. Pastor, and Y. Y. Y. Wong, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2021) 073.
  46. A. D. Dolgov, Phys. Rep. 370, 333 (2002).
  47. K. Akita and M. Yamaguchi, Universe 8, 552 (2022).
  48. J. Lesgourgues, G. Mangano, G. Miele, and S. Pastor, Neutrino Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2013).
  49. E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, Front. Phys. 69, 1 (1990).
  50. V. A. Rubakov and D. S. Gorbunov, Introduction to the Theory of the Early Universe: Hot big bang theory (World Scientific, Singapore, 2017).
  51. A. F. Heckler, Phys. Rev. D 49, 611 (1994).
  52. Y. Fukuda et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2430 (1999).
  53. L. B. Auerbach et al. (LSND Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 63, 112001 (2001).
  54. B. Aharmim et al. (SNO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 111301 (2008).
  55. G. Bellini et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 141302 (2011).
  56. J. N. Bahcall, M. Kamionkowski, and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6146 (1995).
  57. M. Passera, Phys. Rev. D 64, 113002 (2001).
  58. S. Esposito, G. Mangano, G. Miele, I. Picardi, and O. Pisanti, Nucl. Phys. B658, 217 (2003).
  59. S. Esposito, G. Mangano, G. Miele, I. Picardi, and O. Pisanti, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17, 491 (2002).
  60. S. Sarantakos, A. Sirlin, and W. J. Marciano, Nucl. Phys. B217, 84 (1983).
  61. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group, see Electroweak model and constraints on new physics), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  62. A. Sirlin and A. Ferroglia, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 263 (2013).
  63. J. Erler and S. Su, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71, 119 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation