- Letter
- Open Access
Search for violation in (, ) decays and observation of the Cabibbo-suppressed decay
Phys. Rev. D 108, L111102 – Published 21 December, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L111102
Abstract
We search for violation by measuring a -odd asymmetry in the Cabibbo-suppressed decay, and in the Cabibbo-favored and decays. We use of data collected by the Belle detector running at the KEKB asymmetric-energy collider. The -violating -odd parameter is measured to be , , and , where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. We also report the first observation of the Cabibbo-suppressed decay . The branching fraction is measured relative to that of the analogous Cabibbo-favored decay: .
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (33)
- N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963).
- M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
- A. Alavi-Harati et al. (KTeV Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 22 (1999).
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 131801 (2004).
- Y. Chao et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 191802 (2004).
- A. Poluektov et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 81, 112002 (2010).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 221601 (2013).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 211803 (2019).
- A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan, and A. E. Nelson, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43, 27 (1993).
- J. Brod, A. L. Kagan, and J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. D 86, 014023 (2012).
- A. L. Kagan and L. Silvestrini, Phys. Rev. D 103, 053008 (2021).
- Y. Grossman, A. L. Kagan, and Y. Nir, Phys. Rev. D 75, 036008 (2007).
- S. Müller, U. Nierste, and S. Schacht, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 251802 (2015).
Here and throughout the paper, charge-conjugate modes are implied unless stated otherwise.
- I. I. Bigi, Proceedings of KAON2001: International Conference on CP Violation (Pisa, Italy, 2001), p. 417.
- W. Bensalem, A. Datta, and D. London, Phys. Rev. D 66, 094004 (2002).
- M. Gronau and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 84, 096013 (2011).
- G. Durieux and Y. Grossman, Phys. Rev. D 92, 076013 (2015).
- J. Link et al. (FOCUS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 622, 239 (2005).
- P. del Amo Sanchez et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 81, 111103 (2010).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 005.
- K. Prasanth et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 95, 091101(R) (2017).
- J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 84, 031103(R) (2011).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Nat. Phys. 13, 391 (2017).
- A. Sangal et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 107, 052001 (2023).
- S. Kurokawa and E. Kikutani, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 499, 1 (2003), and other papers included in this volume.
- T. Abe et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2013, 03A001 (2013) and references therein.
- A. Abashian et al. (Belle Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 479, 117 (2002); also see Sec. II in J. Brodzicka et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2012, 04D001 (2012).
- D. J. Lange, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 462, 152 (2001).
- R. Brun et al., CERN Report No. DD/EE/84-1, 1987.
- M. Feindt and U. Kerzel, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 559, 190 (2006).
- R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
- L. K. Li et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 107, 033003 (2023).