Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

SU(2)L triplet scalar as the origin of the 95 GeV excess?

Saiyad Ashanujjaman1,2,*, Sumit Banik3,4,†, Guglielmo Coloretti3,4,‡, Andreas Crivellin3,4,§, Bruce Mellado5,6,∥, and Anza-Tshilidzi Mulaudzi5,6,¶

  • 1Department of Physics, SGTB Khalsa College, Delhi 110007, India
  • 2Department of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India
  • 3Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH–8057 Zürich, Switzerland
  • 4Paul Scherrer Institut, CH–5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
  • 5School of Physics and Institute for Collider Particle Physics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Wits 2050, South Africa
  • 6iThemba LABS, National Research Foundation, PO Box 722, Somerset West 7129, South Africa

  • *saiyad.a@iopb.res.in
  • †sumit.banik@psi.ch
  • ‡guglielmo.coloretti@physik.uzh.ch
  • §andreas.crivellin@cern.ch
  • ∥bmellado@mail.cern.ch
  • anza-tshilidzi.mulaudzi@cern.ch

Phys. Rev. D 108, L091704 – Published 20 November, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L091704

Abstract

We explore the possibility that an SU(2)L triplet scalar with hypercharge Y=0 is the origin of the 95 GeV diphoton excess. For a small mixing angle with the Standard Model Higgs, its neutral component has naturally a sizable branching ratio to γγ such that its Drell-Yan production via pp→W*→HH± is sufficient to obtain the desired signal strength, where H± is the charged Higgs component of the triplet. The predictions of this setup are (1) The γγ signal has a pT spectrum different from gluon fusion but similar to associated production. (2) Photons are produced in association with tau leptons and jets, but generally do not fall into the vector-boson fusion category. (3) The existence of a charged Higgs with mH±≈(95±5)  GeV leading to σ(pp→ττνν)≈0.4  pb, which is of the same level as the current limit and can be discovered with Run 3 data. (4) A positive definite shift in the W mass as suggested by the current global electroweak fit.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (164)

  1. S. Schael et al. (ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group Collaboration), Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rep. 427, 257 (2006).
  2. Y. S. Amhis et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, HFLAV Collaboration), Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2021, Phys. Rev. D 107, 052008 (2023).
  3. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  4. P. W. Higgs, Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields, Phys. Lett. 12, 132 (1964).
  5. F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 321 (1964).
  6. P. W. Higgs, Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 508 (1964).
  7. G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble, Global conservation laws and massless particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 585 (1964).
  8. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  9. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  10. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF, D0 Collaborations), Evidence for a particle produced in association with weak bosons and decaying to a bottom-antibottom quark pair in Higgs boson searches at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 071804 (2012).
  11. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Study of the mass and spin-parity of the Higgs boson candidate via its decays to Z boson pairs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 081803 (2013).
  12. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Evidence for the spin-0 nature of the Higgs boson using ATLAS data, Phys. Lett. B 726, 120 (2013).
  13. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS, CMS Collaborations), Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at s=7 and 8 TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 045.
  14. J. M. Langford (ATLAS, CMS Collaborations), Combination of Higgs measurements from ATLAS and CMS: Couplings and κ- framework, Proc. Sci. LHCP2020 (2021) 136.
  15. ATLAS Collaboration, Combined measurements of Higgs boson production and decay using up to 139  fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13  TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2021-053, 2021, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2789544?ln=en.
  16. G. Kole (CMS Collaboration), Search for additional Higgs boson with CMS detector at LHC, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 77, 223 (2022).
  17. C. Palmer (ATLAS, CMS Collaborations), Higgs boson experimental overview for ICHEP 2020, Proc. Sci. ICHEP2020 (2021) 034.
  18. V. Silveira and A. Zee, Scalar Phantoms, Phys. Lett. 161B, 136 (1985).
  19. M. Pietroni, The electroweak phase transition in a nonminimal supersymmetric model, Nucl. Phys. B402, 27 (1993).
  20. J. McDonald, Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3637 (1994).
  21. T. D. Lee, A theory of spontaneous T violation, Phys. Rev. D 8, 1226 (1973).
  22. H. E. Haber and G. L. Kane, The search for supersymmetry: Probing physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Rep. 117, 75 (1985).
  23. J. E. Kim, Light pseudoscalars, particle physics and cosmology, Phys. Rep. 150, 1 (1987).
  24. R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977).
  25. N. Turok and J. Zadrozny, Electroweak baryogenesis in the two doublet model, Nucl. Phys. B358, 471 (1991).
  26. W. Konetschny and W. Kummer, Nonconservation of total lepton number with scalar bosons, Phys. Lett. 70B, 433 (1977).
  27. T. P. Cheng and L.-F. Li, Neutrino masses, mixings and oscillations in SU(2)×U(1) models of electroweak interactions, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2860 (1980).
  28. G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi, and C. Wetterich, Proton lifetime and Fermion masses in an SO(10) model, Nucl. Phys. B181, 287 (1981).
  29. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrino masses in SU(2)×U(1) theories, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2227 (1980).
  30. M. Magg and C. Wetterich, Neutrino mass problem and gauge hierarchy, Phys. Lett. 94B, 61 (1980).
  31. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino masses and mixings in gauge models with spontaneous parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 23, 165 (1981).
  32. O. Fischer et al., Unveiling hidden physics at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 665 (2022).
  33. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for a standard model-like Higgs boson in the mass range between 70 and 110 GeV in the diphoton final state in proton-proton collisions at s=8 and 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 793, 320 (2019).
  34. CMS Collaboration, Search for a standard model-like Higgs boson in the mass range between 70 and 110  GeV in the diphoton final state in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Report No. CMS-PAS-HIG-20-002, 2023, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2852907?ln=en.
  35. CMS Collaboration, Searches for additional Higgs bosons and for vector leptoquarks in ττ final states in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 073.
  36. ATLAS Collaboration, Search for diphoton resonances in the 66 to 110 GeV mass range using 140  fb−1 of 13 TeV pp collisions collected with the ATLAS detector, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2023-035, 2023, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2862024?ln=en.
  37. R. Barate et al. (LEP Working Group for Higgs boson searches, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL Collaborations), Search for the standard model Higgs boson at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 565, 61 (2003).
  38. CMS Collaboration, Measurements of the Higgs boson production cross section and couplings in the W boson pair decay channel in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 667 (2023).
  39. ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of Higgs boson production by gluon-gluon fusion and vector-boson fusion using H→WW*→eνμν decays in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 108, 032005 (2023).
  40. G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, S. Bhattacharya, and B. Mellado, Searching for low-mass resonances decaying into W bosons, Phys. Rev. D 108, 035026 (2023).
  41. S. Bhattacharya, G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, S.-E. Dahbi, Y. Fang, M. Kumar, and B. Mellado, Growing excesses of new scalars at the electroweak scale, arXiv:2306.17209.
  42. J. Cao, X. Guo, Y. He, P. Wu, and Y. Zhang, Diphoton signal of the light Higgs boson in natural NMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 95, 116001 (2017).
  43. A. Crivellin, J. Heeck, and D. Müller, Large h→bs in generic two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rev. D 97, 035008 (2018).
  44. U. Haisch and A. Malinauskas, Let there be light from a second light Higgs doublet, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 135.
  45. P. J. Fox and N. Weiner, Light signals from a lighter Higgs, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 025.
  46. D. Liu, J. Liu, C. E. M. Wagner, and X.-P. Wang, A light Higgs at the LHC and the B-anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 150.
  47. K. Wang, F. Wang, J. Zhu, and Q. Jie, The semi-constrained NMSSM in light of muon g−2, LHC, and dark matter constraints, Chin. Phys. C 42, 103109 (2018).
  48. L. Liu, H. Qiao, K. Wang, and J. Zhu, A light scalar in the minimal dilaton model in light of LHC constraints, Chin. Phys. C 43, 023104 (2019).
  49. T. Biekötter, M. Chakraborti, and S. Heinemeyer, A 96 GeV Higgs boson in the N2HDM, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 2 (2020).
  50. J. M. Cline and T. Toma, Pseudo-Goldstone dark matter confronts cosmic ray and collider anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 100, 035023 (2019).
  51. K. Choi, S. H. Im, K. S. Jeong, and C. B. Park, Light Higgs bosons in the general NMSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 956 (2019).
  52. A. Kundu, S. Maharana, and P. Mondal, A 96 GeV scalar tagged to dark matter models, Nucl. Phys. B955, 115057 (2020).
  53. J. Cao, X. Jia, Y. Yue, H. Zhou, and P. Zhu, 96 GeV diphoton excess in seesaw extensions of the natural NMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 101, 055008 (2020).
  54. T. Biekötter, M. Chakraborti, and S. Heinemeyer, The “96 GeV excess” at the LHC, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, 2142018 (2021).
  55. A. A. Abdelalim, B. Das, S. Khalil, and S. Moretti, Di-photon decay of a light Higgs state in the BLSSM, Nucl. Phys. B985, 116013 (2022).
  56. S. Heinemeyer, C. Li, F. Lika, G. Moortgat-Pick, and S. Paasch, Phenomenology of a 96 GeV Higgs boson in the 2HDM with an additional singlet, Phys. Rev. D 106, 075003 (2022).
  57. T. Biekötter, S. Heinemeyer, and G. Weiglein, Mounting evidence for a 95 GeV Higgs boson, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 201.
  58. S. Iguro, T. Kitahara, and Y. Omura, Scrutinizing the 95–100 GeV di-tau excess in the top associated process, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1053 (2022).
  59. W. Li, J. Zhu, K. Wang, S. Ma, P. Tian, and H. Qiao, A light Higgs boson in the NMSSM confronted with the CMS di-photon and di-tau excesses, arXiv:2212.11739.
  60. S. Iguro, T. Kitahara, Y. Omura, and H. Zhang, Chasing the two-Higgs doublet model in the di-Higgs boson production, Phys. Rev. D 107, 075017 (2023).
  61. T. Biekötter, S. Heinemeyer, and G. Weiglein, The CMS di-photon excess at 95 GeV in view of the LHC Run 2 results, Phys. Lett. B 846, 138217 (2023).
  62. C. Bonilla, A. E. Carcamo Hernandez, S. Kovalenko, H. Lee, R. Pasechnik, and I. Schmidt, Fermion mass hierarchy in an extended left-right symmetric model, arXiv:2305.11967.
  63. D. Azevedo, T. Biekötter, and P. M. Ferreira, 2HDM interpretations of the CMS diphoton excess at 95 GeV, arXiv:2305.19716.
  64. S. Banik, A. Crivellin, S. Iguro, and T. Kitahara, Asymmetric di-Higgs signals of the N2HDM-U(1), Phys. Rev. D 108, 075011 (2023).
  65. T. Biekötter, S. Heinemeyer, and G. Weiglein, The 95.4 GeV di-photon excess at ATLAS and CMS, arXiv:2306.03889.
  66. P. Escribano, V. M. Lozano, and A. Vicente, A Scotogenic explanation for the 95 GeV excesses, arXiv:2306.03735.
  67. A. Belyaev, R. Benbrik, M. Boukidi, M. Chakraborti, S. Moretti, and S. Semlali, Explanation of the hints for a 95 GeV Higgs boson within a 2-Higgs doublet model, arXiv:2306.09029.
  68. V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Search for doubly-charged Higgs boson pair production in pp¯ collisions at s=1.96  TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 021801 (2012).
  69. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Search for new physics in high pT like-sign dilepton events at CDF II, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 181801 (2011).
  70. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for anomalous production of prompt same-sign lepton pairs and pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with s=8  TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2015) 041.
  71. CMS Collaboration, Search for a doubly-charged Higgs boson with s=8  TeV pp collisions at the CMS experiment, Report No. CMS-PAS-HIG-14-039, 2016, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2127498?ln=en.
  72. J. Heeck, W-boson mass in the triplet seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 015004 (2022).
  73. S. Ashanujjaman, K. Ghosh, and R. Sahu, Low-mass doubly charged Higgs bosons at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 107, 015018 (2023).
  74. S. Chakrabarti, D. Choudhury, R. M. Godbole, and B. Mukhopadhyaya, Observing doubly charged Higgs bosons in photon-photon collisions, Phys. Lett. B 434, 347 (1998).
  75. A. G. Akeroyd and M. Aoki, Single and pair production of doubly charged Higgs bosons at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 72, 035011 (2005).
  76. M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, and K. Yagyu, Testing the Higgs triplet model with the mass difference at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85, 055007 (2012).
  77. S. Ashanujjaman and K. Ghosh, Revisiting type-II see-saw: Present limits and future prospects at LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 195.
  78. S. Ashanujjaman, K. Ghosh, and K. Huitu, Type-II see-saw: Searching the LHC elusive low-mass triplet-like Higgses at e−e+ colliders, Phys. Rev. D 106, 075028 (2022).
  79. S. Ashanujjaman and S. P. Maharathy, Probing compressed mass spectra in the type-II seesaw model at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 107, 115026 (2023).
  80. M. Chabab, M. C. Peyranère, and L. Rahili, Probing the Higgs sector of Y=0 Higgs triplet model at LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 873 (2018).
  81. P. Fileviez Perez, H. H. Patel, and A. D. Plascencia, On the W mass and new Higgs bosons, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137371 (2022).
  82. Y. Cheng, X.-G. He, F. Huang, J. Sun, and Z.-P. Xing, Electroweak precision tests for triplet scalars, Nucl. Phys. B989, 116118 (2023).
  83. T.-K. Chen, C.-W. Chiang, and K. Yagyu, Explanation of the W mass shift at CDF II in the extended Georgi-Machacek model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 055035 (2022).
  84. T. G. Rizzo, Kinetic mixing, dark Higgs triplets, and MW, Phys. Rev. D 106, 035024 (2022).
  85. W. Chao, M. Jin, H.-J. Li, and Y.-Q. Peng, Axion-like dark matter from the type-II seesaw mechanism, arXiv:2210.13233.
  86. J.-W. Wang, X.-J. Bi, P.-F. Yin, and Z.-H. Yu, Electroweak dark matter model accounting for the CDF W-mass anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 106, 055001 (2022).
  87. Y. Shimizu and S. Takeshita, W boson mass and grand unification via the type-II seesaw-like mechanism, Nucl. Phys. B994, 116290 (2023).
  88. G. Lazarides, R. Maji, R. Roshan, and Q. Shafi, Heavier W boson, dark matter, and gravitational waves from strings in an SO(10) axion model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 055009 (2022).
  89. G. Senjanović and M. Zantedeschi, SU(5) grand unification and W-boson mass, Phys. Lett. B 837, 137653 (2023).
  90. A. Crivellin, M. Kirk, and A. Thapa, Y=0 scalar triplet beyond the W mass: (g−2)μ, h→μ+μ− and CKM unitarity, Phys. Rev. D 108, L031702 (2023).
  91. T.-K. Chen, C.-W. Chiang, and K. Yagyu, CP violation in a model with Higgs triplets, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 069.
  92. J. de Blas, M. Pierini, L. Reina, and L. Silvestrini, Impact of the recent measurements of the top-quark and W-boson masses on electroweak precision fits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 271801 (2022).
  93. P. Athron, M. Bach, D. H. J. Jacob, W. Kotlarski, D. Stöckinger, and A. Voigt, Precise calculation of the W boson pole mass beyond the standard model with FlexibleSUSY, Phys. Rev. D 106, 095023 (2022).
  94. E. Bagnaschi, J. Ellis, M. Madigan, K. Mimasu, V. Sanz, and T. You, SMEFT analysis of mW, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 308.
  95. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CDF II detector, Science 376, 170 (2022).
  96. D. A. Ross and M. J. G. Veltman, Neutral currents in neutrino experiments, Nucl. Phys. B95, 135 (1975).
  97. J. F. Gunion, R. Vega, and J. Wudka, Higgs triplets in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 42, 1673 (1990).
  98. P. H. Chankowski, S. Pokorski, and J. Wagner, (Non)decoupling of the Higgs triplet effects, Eur. Phys. J. C 50, 919 (2007).
  99. T. Blank and W. Hollik, Precision observables in SU(2)×U(1) models with an additional Higgs triplet, Nucl. Phys. B514, 113 (1998).
  100. J. R. Forshaw, A. Sabio Vera, and B. E. White, Mass bounds in a model with a triplet Higgs, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2003) 059.
  101. M.-C. Chen, S. Dawson, and T. Krupovnickas, Higgs triplets and limits from precision measurements, Phys. Rev. D 74, 035001 (2006).
  102. R. S. Chivukula, N. D. Christensen, and E. H. Simmons, Low-energy effective theory, unitarity, and non-decoupling behavior in a model with heavy Higgs-triplet fields, Phys. Rev. D 77, 035001 (2008).
  103. P. Bandyopadhyay and A. Costantini, Obscure Higgs boson at colliders, Phys. Rev. D 103, 015025 (2021).
  104. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L091704 for containing the model description together with the explicit computations for the mass matrices, the minimization conditions, vacuum stability, and perturbative unitarity, and some loop-functions.
  105. ATLAS Collaboration, Improved W boson mass measurement using 7 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2023-004, 2023, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2853290?ln=en.
  106. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Measurement of the W-boson mass in pp collisions at s=7  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 110 (2018); 78, 898(E) (2018).
  107. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the W boson mass, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 036.
  108. S. Schael et al. (ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, LEP Electroweak Collaborations), Electroweak measurements in electron-positron collisions at W-boson-pair energies at LEP, Phys. Rep. 532, 119 (2013).
  109. A. Sirlin, On the O(α2) corrections to τ (μ), mW, mZ in the SU(2)L×U(1) theory, Phys. Rev. D 29, 89 (1984).
  110. A. Djouadi and C. Verzegnassi, Virtual very heavy top effects in LEP / SLC precision measurements, Phys. Lett. B 195, 265 (1987).
  111. L. Avdeev, J. Fleischer, S. Mikhailov, and O. Tarasov, 0(ααs2) correction to the electroweak ρ parameter, Phys. Lett. B 336, 560 (1994); 349, 597(E) (1995).
  112. K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn, and M. Steinhauser, QCD corrections from top quark to relations between electroweak parameters to order αs2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3394 (1995).
  113. K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn, and M. Steinhauser, Corrections of order O(GFMt2αs2) to the ρ parameter, Phys. Lett. B 351, 331 (1995).
  114. M. Awramik, M. Czakon, A. Freitas, and G. Weiglein, Precise prediction for the W boson mass in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 69, 053006 (2004).
  115. G. Degrassi, P. Gambino, and P. P. Giardino, The mW−mZ interdependence in the standard model: A new scrutiny, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2015) 154.
  116. J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, and S. Dawson, The Higgs Hunter’s Guide (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000), Vol. 80.
  117. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Measurements of Higgs boson production cross sections and couplings in the diphoton decay channel at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 027.
  118. ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the properties of Higgs boson production at s=13  TeV in the H→γγ channel using 139  fb−1 of pp collision data with the ATLAS experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 088.
  119. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature (London) 607, 60 (2022).
  120. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the 4ℓ decay channel at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 957 (2020); 81, 29(E) (2021); 81, 398(E) (2021).
  121. A. H. Ajjath, B. Fuks, H.-S. Shao, and Y. Simon, Precision predictions for exotic lepton production at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. D 107, 075011 (2023).
  122. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, madgraph 5: Going beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 128.
  123. D. de Florian et al. (LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Collaboration), Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs Sector, arXiv:1610.07922.
  124. D. Graudenz, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas, QCD corrections to Higgs boson production at proton proton colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1372 (1993).
  125. M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz, and P. M. Zerwas, Higgs boson production at the LHC, Nucl. Phys. B453, 17 (1995).
  126. C. Anastasiou and K. Melnikov, Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD, Nucl. Phys. B646, 220 (2002).
  127. R. V. Harlander and W. B. Kilgore, Next-to-next-to-leading order Higgs production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 201801 (2002).
  128. R. V. Harlander and W. B. Kilgore, Soft and virtual corrections to proton proton→H+x at NNLO, Phys. Rev. D 64, 013015 (2001).
  129. U. Aglietti, R. Bonciani, G. Degrassi, and A. Vicini, Analytic results for virtual QCD corrections to Higgs production and decay, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2007) 021.
  130. H.-L. Li, P.-C. Lu, Z.-G. Si, and Y. Wang, Associated production of Higgs boson and tt¯ at LHC, Chin. Phys. C 40, 063102 (2016).
  131. C. Anastasiou, S. Beerli, S. Bucherer, A. Daleo, and Z. Kunszt, Two-loop amplitudes and master integrals for the production of a Higgs boson via a massive quark and a scalar-quark loop, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2007) 082.
  132. R. Harlander and P. Kant, Higgs production and decay: Analytic results at next-to-leading order QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2005) 015.
  133. V. Ravindran, J. Smith, and W. L. van Neerven, NNLO corrections to the total cross-section for Higgs boson production in hadron hadron collisions, Nucl. Phys. B665, 325 (2003).
  134. A. Delgado, M. Garcia-Pepin, M. Quiros, J. Santiago, and R. Vega-Morales, Diphoton and diboson probes of fermiophobic Higgs bosons at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 042.
  135. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for direct stau production in events with two hadronic τ-leptons in s=13  TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 101, 032009 (2020).
  136. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for direct pair production of supersymmetric partners to the τ lepton in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 189 (2020).
  137. CMS Collaboration, Search for direct pair production of supersymmetric partners of τ leptons in the final state with two hadronically decaying τ leptons and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Rev. D 108, 012011 (2023).
  138. ATLAS Collaboration, Search for electroweak SUSY production in final states with two τ-leptons in s=13  TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2023-029, 2023, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2861058.
  139. R. Ruiz, QCD corrections to pair production of type III seesaw Leptons at Hadron Colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 165.
  140. E. Braaten and J. P. Leveille, Higgs boson decay and the running mass, Phys. Rev. D 22, 715 (1980).
  141. N. Sakai, Perturbative QCD corrections to the hadronic decay width of the Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2220 (1980).
  142. T. Inami and T. Kubota, Renormalization group estimate of the hadronic decay width of the Higgs boson, Nucl. Phys. B179, 171 (1981).
  143. S. G. Gorishnii, A. L. Kataev, and S. A. Larin, The width of Higgs boson decay into hadrons: Three loop corrections of strong interactions, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 40, 329 (1984), https://lib-extopc.kek.jp/preprints/PDF/1983/8311/8311112.pdf.
  144. S. G. Gorishnii, A. L. Kataev, S. A. Larin, and L. R. Surguladze, The Analytical four loop corrections to the QED Beta function in the MS scheme and to the QED psi function: Total reevaluation, Phys. Lett. B 256, 81 (1991).
  145. S. G. Gorishnii, A. L. Kataev, S. A. Larin, and L. R. Surguladze, Corrected Three loop QCD correction to the correlator of the quark scalar currents and γ (Tot) (H0→hadrons), Mod. Phys. Lett. A 05, 2703 (1990).
  146. S. G. Gorishnii, A. L. Kataev, S. A. Larin, and L. R. Surguladze, Scheme dependence of the next to next-to-leading QCD corrections to Gamma(tot) (H0→hadrons) and the spurious QCD infrared fixed point, Phys. Rev. D 43, 1633 (1991).
  147. A. Djouadi, P. Gambino, and B. A. Kniehl, Two loop electroweak heavy fermion corrections to Higgs boson production and decay, Nucl. Phys. B523, 17 (1998).
  148. G. Degrassi and F. Maltoni, Two-loop electroweak corrections to the Higgs-boson decay H→γγ, Nucl. Phys. B724, 183 (2005).
  149. G. Passarino, C. Sturm, and S. Uccirati, Complete two-loop corrections to H→γγ, Phys. Lett. B 655, 298 (2007).
  150. S. Actis, G. Passarino, C. Sturm, and S. Uccirati, NNLO computational techniques: The cases H→γγ and H→gg, Nucl. Phys. B811, 182 (2009).
  151. A. Djouadi, M. Spira, J. J. van der Bij, and P. M. Zerwas, QCD corrections to gamma gamma decays of Higgs particles in the intermediate mass range, Phys. Lett. B 257, 187 (1991).
  152. K. G. Chetyrkin, Correlator of the quark scalar currents and Gamma(tot) (H→hadrons) at O(αs3) in pQCD, Phys. Lett. B 390, 309 (1997).
  153. P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, and J. H. Kuhn, Scalar correlator at O(alphas4), Higgs decay into b-quarks and bounds on the light quark masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 012003 (2006).
  154. M. Spira, A. Djouadi, and P. M. Zerwas, QCD corrections to the H Z gamma coupling, Phys. Lett. B 276, 350 (1992).
  155. A. Abada et al. (FCC Collaboration), FCC-ee: The lepton collider: Future circular collider conceptual design report Volume 2, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 228, 261 (2019).
  156. A Multi-TeV Linear Collider Based on CLIC Technology: CLIC Conceptual Design Report, Report No. CERN-2012-007; SLAC-R-985; KEK-Report-2012-1; PSI-12-01; JAI-2012-001, 2012, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1500095?ln=en.
  157. H. Abramowicz et al., The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report—Volume 4: Detectors, arXiv:1306.6329.
  158. F. An et al., Precision Higgs physics at the CEPC, Chin. Phys. C 43, 043002 (2019).
  159. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  160. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3 Collaboration), delphes 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  161. C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer, and T. Reiter, UFO—The universal FeynRules o Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1201 (2012).
  162. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, feynrules 2.0—A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  163. C. Degrande, Automatic evaluation of UV and R2 terms for beyond the Standard Model Lagrangians: A proof-of-principle, Comput. Phys. Commun. 197, 239 (2015).
  164. D. Buarque Franzosi, O. Mattelaer, R. Ruiz, and S. Shil, Automated predictions from polarized matrix elements, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 082.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation