Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Novel approach for computing gradients of physical observables

Simone Bacchio

  • Computation-based Science and Technology Research Center, The Cyprus Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus

Phys. Rev. D 108, L091508 – Published 30 November, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L091508

Abstract

We show that an infinitesimal step of gradient flow can be used for defining a novel approach for computing gradients of physical observables with respect to action parameters. Compared to the commonly used perturbative expansion, this approach does not require calculating any disconnected contribution or vacuum expectation value and can provide results up to 3 orders of magnitudes more precise. On the other hand, it requires a nontrivial condition to be satisfied by the flow action, the calculation of its force and its Laplacian, and the force of the observable, whose gradient needs to be measured. As a proof of concept, we measure gradients in β of Wilson loops in a four-dimensional SU(3) Yang-Mills theory simulated on a 164 lattice using the Wilson action.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (25)

  1. M. Lüscher, Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm, Commun. Math. Phys. 293, 899 (2010).
  2. R. Horsley, R. Millo, Y. Nakamura, H. Perlt, D. Pleiter, P. Rakow, G. Schierholz, A. Schiller, F. Winter, and J. Zanotti, A lattice study of the glue in the nucleon, Phys. Lett. B 714, 312 (2012).
  3. A. J. Chambers et al. (CSSM, QCDSF/UKQCD Collaborations), Feynman-Hellmann approach to the spin structure of hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 90, 014510 (2014).
  4. A. J. Chambers et al., Disconnected contributions to the spin of the nucleon, Phys. Rev. D 92, 114517 (2015).
  5. C. Bouchard, C. C. Chang, T. Kurth, K. Orginos, and A. Walker-Loud, On the Feynman-Hellmann theorem in quantum field theory and the calculation of matrix elements, Phys. Rev. D 96, 014504 (2017).
  6. C. C. Chang et al., A per-cent-level determination of the nucleon axial coupling from quantum chromodynamics, Nature (London) 558, 91 (2018).
  7. K. U. Can et al., Lattice QCD evaluation of the Compton amplitude employing the Feynman-Hellmann theorem, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114505 (2020).
  8. G. M. de Divitiis et al., Isospin breaking effects due to the up-down mass difference in lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2012) 124.
  9. G. M. de Divitiis, R. Frezzotti, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, R. Petronzio, G. C. Rossi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, and N. Tantalo (RM123 Collaboration), Leading isospin breaking effects on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D 87, 114505 (2013).
  10. S. Borsanyi et al. (BMW Collaboration), Ab initio calculation of the neutron-proton mass difference, Science 347, 1452 (2015).
  11. D. Giusti, V. Lubicz, C. Tarantino, G. Martinelli, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, and N. Tantalo, Leading isospin-breaking corrections to pion, kaon and charmed-meson masses with twisted-mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114504 (2017).
  12. S. Borsanyi et al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature (London) 593, 51 (2021).
  13. D. Giusti, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, C. T. Sachrajda, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, N. Tantalo, and C. Tarantino, First lattice calculation of the QED corrections to leptonic decay rates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 072001 (2018).
  14. M. Di Carlo, D. Giusti, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, C. T. Sachrajda, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, and N. Tantalo, Light-meson leptonic decay rates in lattice QCD+QED, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034514 (2019).
  15. C. Alexandrou et al. (Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration), Lattice calculation of the short and intermediate time-distance hadronic vacuum polarization contributions to the muon magnetic moment using twisted-mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074506 (2023).
  16. J. Dragos, T. Luu, A. Shindler, J. de Vries, and A. Yousif, Confirming the existence of the strong CP problem in lattice QCD with the gradient flow, Phys. Rev. C 103, 015202 (2021).
  17. C. Alexandrou, A. Athenodorou, K. Hadjiyiannakou, and A. Todaro, Neutron electric dipole moment using lattice QCD simulations at the physical point, Phys. Rev. D 103, 054501 (2021).
  18. T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, R. Gupta, E. Mereghetti, and B. Yoon, Contribution of the QCD Θ-term to the nucleon electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. D 103, 114507 (2021).
  19. S. Schaefer, R. Sommer, and F. Virotta (ALPHA Collaboration), Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations, Nucl. Phys. B845, 93 (2011).
  20. S. Bacchio, P. Kessel, S. Schaefer, and L. Vaitl, Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 107, L051504 (2023).
  21. R. Abbott et al., Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, arXiv:2305.02402.
  22. S. Bacchio, J. Finkenrath, and C. Stylianou, Lyncs-API: A python API for lattice QCD applications, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2021 (2022) 542.
  23. S. Yamamoto, S. Bacchio, and J. Finenrath, Running HMC Simulation with python via QUDA, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2022 (2023) 346.
  24. M. A. Clark, R. Babich, K. Barros, R. C. Brower, and C. Rebbi, Solving Lattice QCD systems of equations using mixed precision solvers on GPUs, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1517 (2010).
  25. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation