Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Critical superflows and thermodynamic instabilities in superfluids

Blaise Goutéraux* and Filippo Sottovia†

Eric Mefford‡

  • CPHT, CNRS, École polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120 Palaiseau, France

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3P6, Canada

  • *blaise.gouteraux@polytechnique.edu
  • †filippo.sottovia@polytechnique.edu
  • ‡ericmefford@uvic.ca

Phys. Rev. D 108, L081903 – Published 27 October, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L081903

Abstract

In this work, we study the linear stability of superfluid phases of matter irrespective of the nature of microscopic degrees of freedom and the strength of interactions between them. Famously, assuming invariance under Galilean boosts and a phonon-roton single-particle dispersion relation, Landau predicted superfluid helium 4 would become unstable for large enough superfluid velocities. Here, we demonstrate that such instabilities generically follow from a change of sign of one of the eigenvalues of the matrix of second derivatives of the free energy. Our only assumption is the existence of static thermodynamic equilibrium, irrespective of any invariance under boosts or microscopic statistics. Turning on dissipation, we show that a linear dynamical instability also develops, leading to exponential growth in time of perturbations around equilibrium. Specializing to Galilean superfluids and assuming the existence of bosonic quasiparticles, our criterion reproduces Landau’s critical velocity for Bose-Einstein condensates. Our criterion also reduces to the well-known maximal supercurrent in weakly coupled superconductors described either by Landau-Ginzburg or Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory. Further, it correctly reproduces the onset of the instability in relativistic, strongly coupled superfluids without quasiparticles at zero as well as finite temperature, which we construct using gauge/gravity duality. As a less trivial application of our criterion, we show that in dirty superfluids the instability manifests itself first in the thermal diffusion mode instead of the superfluid sound mode. Our work provides a simple, comprehensive, and unified description of the large superflow instability of superfluids and superconductors at any temperature independent of the microscopic details of the system and the strength of interactions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (76)

  1. L. Landau, E. Lifshitz, and L. Pitaevskii, Course of Theoretical Physics: Statistical Physics, Part 2: by E.M. Lifshitz and L.P. Pitaevskii (Pergamon, New York, 1980), Vol. 9.
  2. D. Page and S. Reddy, Dense matter in compact stars: Theoretical developments and observational constraints, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56, 327 (2006).
  3. A. J. Leggett, Bose-Einstein condensation in the alkali gases: Some fundamental concepts, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 307 (2001).
  4. C. J. Pethick and H. Smith, Bose–Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2008), 10.1017/CBO9780511802850.
  5. A. J. Leggett, Quantum Liquids: Bose Condensation and Cooper Pairing in Condensed-Matter Systems (Oxford University Press, New York, 2006).
  6. L. Meyer and F. Reif, Ion motion in superfluid liquid helium under pressure, Phys. Rev. 123, 727 (1961).
  7. P. McClintock, Ions in superfluid helium, Physica (Amsterdam) 127B+C, 300 (1984).
  8. A. I. Ahonen, J. Kokko, O. V. Lounasmaa, M. A. Paalanen, R. C. Richardson, W. Schoepe, and Y. Takano, Mobility of negative ions in superfluid He3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 511 (1976).
  9. C. Raman, M. Köhl, R. Onofrio, D. S. Durfee, C. E. Kuklewicz, Z. Hadzibabic, and W. Ketterle, Evidence for a critical velocity in a Bose-Einstein condensed gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2502 (1999).
  10. R. Onofrio, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, J. R. Abo-Shaeer, A. P. Chikkatur, and W. Ketterle, Observation of superfluid flow in a Bose-Einstein condensed gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2228 (2000).
  11. J. Bardeen, Critical fields and currents in superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34, 667 (1962).
  12. A. J. Clark, On the hydrodynamics of superfluid helium, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1963.
  13. S. J. Putterman, Superfluid Hydrodynamics (North-Holland/American Elsevier, London, 1974), Vol. 3.
  14. I. M. Khalatnikov and I. M. Khalatnikov, An Introduction to the Theory of Superfluidity, Frontiers in Physics (Benjamin, New York, NY, 1965) translated from Russian.
  15. J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, and S. Minwalla, Dissipative superfluid dynamics from gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2011) 125.
  16. J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Minwalla, and A. Yarom, A theory of first order dissipative superfluid dynamics, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2014) 147.
  17. A. Schmitt, Introduction to Superfluidity: Field-Theoretical Approach and Applications (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2015), Vol. 888, 10.1007/978-3-319-07947-9.
  18. L. V. Delacrétaz, D. M. Hofman, and G. Mathys, Superfluids as higher-form anomalies, SciPost Phys. 8, 047 (2020).
  19. B. Carter and D. Langlois, The equation of state for cool relativistic two constituent superfluid dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 51, 5855 (1995).
  20. D. T. Son, Low-energy quantum effective action for relativistic superfluids, arXiv:hep-ph/0204199.
  21. A. Nicolis, Low-energy effective field theory for finite-temperature relativistic superfluids, arXiv:1108.2513.
  22. S. S. Gubser, Breaking an Abelian gauge symmetry near a black hole horizon, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065034 (2008).
  23. S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog, and G. T. Horowitz, Building a holographic superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 031601 (2008).
  24. S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog, and G. T. Horowitz, Holographic superconductors, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2008) 015.
  25. M. G. Alford, S. K. Mallavarapu, A. Schmitt, and S. Stetina, From a complex scalar field to the two-fluid picture of superfluidity, Phys. Rev. D 87, 065001 (2013).
  26. I. Kourkoulou, A. Nicolis, and K. Parmentier, Low-temperature thermal corrections to a superfluid’s equation of state, arXiv:2212.12555.
  27. I. Amado, D. Areán, A. Jiménez-Alba, K. Landsteiner, L. Melgar, and I. Salazar Landea, Holographic superfluids and the Landau criterion, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 063.
  28. S. Lan, H. Liu, Y. Tian, and H. Zhang, Landau instability and soliton formations, arXiv:2010.06232.
  29. S. S. Gubser and I. Mitra, Instability of charged black holes in anti-de Sitter space, Clay Math. Proc. 1, 221 (2002), https://inspirehep.net/literature/533658.
  30. S. S. Gubser and I. Mitra, The evolution of unstable black holes in anti-de Sitter space, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2001) 018.
  31. J. J. Friess, S. S. Gubser, and I. Mitra, Counterexamples to the correlated stability conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 72, 104019 (2005).
  32. A. Buchel, A holographic perspective on Gubser-Mitra conjecture, Nucl. Phys. B731, 109 (2005).
  33. A. Donos, J. P. Gauntlett, and V. Ziogas, Diffusion for holographic lattices, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 056.
  34. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L081903 for critical superflows and thermodynamic instabilities in superfluids, which includes Refs. [11,15–17,20,21,26,35–53].
  35. I. Novak, J. Sonner, and B. Withers, Hydrodynamics without boosts, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 165.
  36. J. Armas and A. Jain, Effective field theory for hydrodynamics without boosts, SciPost Phys. 11, 054 (2021).
  37. J. P. Eisenstein, G. W. Swift, and R. E. Packard, Observations of a critical current in He3−b, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1676 (1979).
  38. I. Amado, M. Kaminski, and K. Landsteiner, Hydrodynamics of holographic superconductors, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2009) 021.
  39. D. Arean, M. Baggioli, S. Grieninger, and K. Landsteiner, A holographic superfluid symphony, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 206.
  40. A. Donos and P. Kailidis, Dissipative effects in finite density holographic superfluids, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 053.
  41. G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, From AdS/CFT correspondence to hydrodynamics, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2002) 043.
  42. D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, Minkowski space correlators in AdS/CFT correspondence: Recipe and applications, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2002) 042.
  43. G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, From AdS/CFT correspondence to hydrodynamics. 2. Sound waves, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2002) 054.
  44. C. P. Herzog, The hydrodynamics of M theory, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2002) 026.
  45. T. Andrade and B. Withers, A simple holographic model of momentum relaxation, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2014) 101.
  46. T. Andrade and S. A. Gentle, Relaxed superconductors, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2015) 140.
  47. B. Goutéraux and E. Mefford, Normal charge densities in quantum critical superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 161604 (2020).
  48. B. Goutéraux and E. Mefford, Non-vanishing zero-temperature normal density in holographic superfluids, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 091.
  49. V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, A stress tensor for anti-de Sitter gravity, Commun. Math. Phys. 208, 413 (1999).
  50. K. Skenderis, Lecture notes on holographic renormalization, Classical Quantum Gravity 19, 5849 (2002).
  51. J. Sonner and B. Withers, A gravity derivation of the Tisza-Landau model in AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. D 82, 026001 (2010).
  52. P. K. Kovtun and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes and holography, Phys. Rev. D 72, 086009 (2005).
  53. O. J. C. Dias, J. E. Santos, and B. Way, Numerical methods for finding stationary gravitational solutions, Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 133001 (2016).
  54. B. Goutéraux, E. Mefford, and F. Sottovia, Holographic superfluids with finite superfluid velocities (to be published).
  55. A. F. Andreev and L. A. Melnikovsky, Thermodynamic inequalities in a superfluid, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 78, 574 (2003).
  56. A. F. Andreev and L. A. Melnikovsky, Thermodynamics of superfluidity, J. Low Temp. Phys. 135, 411 (2004).
  57. A. Haber, A. Schmitt, and S. Stetina, Instabilities in relativistic two-component (super)fluids, Phys. Rev. D 93, 025011 (2016).
  58. N. Andersson and A. Schmitt, Dissipation triggers dynamical two-stream instability, Particles 2, 457 (2019).
  59. L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics, 2nd ed., edited by L. Landau and E. Lifshitz (Pergamon, New York, 1987).
  60. P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky, Principles of Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995), 10.1017/CBO9780511813467.
  61. J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma, and S. Vandoren, Perfect fluids, SciPost Phys. 5, 003 (2018).
  62. J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma, and S. Vandoren, Hydrodynamic modes of homogeneous and isotropic fluids, SciPost Phys. 5, 014 (2018).
  63. J. de Boer, J. Hartong, E. Have, N. A. Obers, and W. Sybesma, Non-boost invariant fluid dynamics, SciPost Phys. 9, 018 (2020).
  64. J. Armas and E. Have, Ideal fracton superfluids, arXiv:2304.09596.
  65. N. Banerjee, S. Dutta, and A. Jain, First order Galilean superfluid dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 96, 065004 (2017).
  66. C. P. Herzog, An analytic holographic superconductor, Phys. Rev. D 81, 126009 (2010).
  67. D. Arean, M. Bertolini, C. Krishnan, and T. Prochazka, Type IIB holographic superfluid flows, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2011) 008.
  68. A. Schmitt, Superfluid two-stream instability in a microscopic model, Phys. Rev. D 89, 065024 (2014).
  69. J. Armas, A. Jain, and R. Lier, Approximate symmetries, pseudo-Goldstones, and the second law of thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 108, 086011 (2023).
  70. A. Donos and J. P. Gauntlett, Holographic Q-lattices, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 040.
  71. Y. Ling, P. Liu, C. Niu, J.-P. Wu, and Z.-Y. Xian, Holographic superconductor on Q-lattice, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 059.
  72. K.-Y. Kim, K. K. Kim, and M. Park, A simple holographic superconductor with momentum relaxation, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 152.
  73. D. I. Bradley, S. N. Fisher, A. M. Guénault, R. P. Haley, C. R. Lawson, G. R. Pickett, R. Schanen, M. Skyba, V. Tsepelin, and D. E. Zmeev, Breaking the superfluid speed limit in a fermionic condensate, Nat. Phys. 12, 1017 (2016).
  74. A. Paris-Mandoki, J. Shearring, F. Mancarella, T. M. Fromhold, A. Trombettoni, and P. Krüger, Superfluid flow above the critical velocity, Sci. Rep. 7, 9070 (2017).
  75. S. Autti, J. T. Mäkinen, J. Rysti, G. E. Volovik, V. V. Zavjalov, and V. B. Eltsov, Exceeding the Landau speed limit with topological Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033013 (2020).
  76. B. Goutéraux, E. Mefford, and F. Sottovia, Linear dynamical stability and positivity of entropy production (to be published).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation