- Letter
- Open Access
Coherent states in M-theory: A brane scan using the Taub-NUT geometry
Phys. Rev. D 108, L081902 – Published 17 October, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L081902
Abstract
The Taub-NUT geometry corresponds to the Kaluza-Klein monopole solution of M-theory and on dimension reduction along the Taub-NUT circle direction it becomes the D6 brane of type IIA string theory. We show that the Taub-NUT geometry can be realized as a coherent state, or more appropriately as a Glauber-Sudarshan state in M-theory, once we take the underlying resurgence structure carefully. Using the duality chain it in turn implies that all D-branes as well as NS5-branes can be realized as Glauber-Sudarshan states in string theory. Our analysis also leads to an intriguing possibility of realizing the gravity duals of certain nonconformal minimally supersymmetric gauge theories by deforming a class of Glauber-Sudarshan states.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (27)
- J. Dai, R. G. Leigh, and J. Polchinski, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 04, 2073 (1989).
- J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4724 (1995).
- E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B443, 85 (1995).
- C. M. Hull and P. K. Townsend, Nucl. Phys. B438, 109 (1995).
- A. Sen, arXiv:hep-th/9802051.
- G. Dvali, C. Gomez, L. Gruending, and T. Rug, Nucl. Phys. B901, 338 (2015).
- S. Brahma, K. Dasgupta, and R. Tatar, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 114.
- S. Brahma, K. Dasgupta, and R. Tatar, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 104.
- H. Bernardo, S. Brahma, K. Dasgupta, M.-M. Faruk, and R. Tatar, Fortschr. Phys. 69, 2100131 (2021).
- J. Polchinski, Nucl. Phys. B231, 269 (1984).
- S. Brahma, K. Dasgupta, M.-M. Faruk et al., arXiv:2211.09181.
- P. K. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B 350, 184 (1995).
- S. Brahma, J. Chakravarty, K. Dasgupta, B. Kulinich, and A. Maji (to be published).
- A. Sen, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 1, 115 (1998).
- A. Sen, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (1997) 001.
- R. C. Myers, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (1999) 022.
- T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5112 (1997).
- S. H. Shenker, arXiv:hep-th/9509132.
- Y. Imamura, Phys. Lett. B 414, 242 (1997).
- R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3, 1415 (1999).
- J. M. Maldacena and C. Nunez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 588 (2001).
- C. Vafa, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 42, 2798 (2001).
- F. Cachazo, K. A. Intriligator, and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B603, 3 (2001).
- M. Atiyah, J. M. Maldacena, and C. Vafa, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 42, 3209 (2001).
- M. Becker, K. Dasgupta, A. Knauf, and R. Tatar, Nucl. Phys. B702, 207 (2004).
- S. Alexander, K. Becker, M. Becker, K. Dasgupta, A. Knauf, and R. Tatar, Nucl. Phys. B704, 231 (2005).
- M. Becker, K. Dasgupta, S. H. Katz, A. Knauf, and R. Tatar, Nucl. Phys. B738, 124 (2006).