Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Coupled-channel system with anomalous thresholds and unitarity

Csaba L. Korpa1, Matthias F. M. Lutz2, Xiao-Yu Guo3, and Yonggoo Heo4,2

  • 1MTA-PTE High-Field Terahertz Research Group, Ifjúság útja 6, 7624 Pécs, Hungary and Institute of Physics, University of Pécs, Ifjúság útja 6, 7624 Pécs, Hungary
  • 2GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
  • 3Faculty of Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • 4Bogoliubov Laboratory for Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Moscow region, Russia

Phys. Rev. D 107, L031505 – Published 27 February, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L031505

Abstract

A first nonperturbative and unitary treatment of multichannel systems with anomalous thresholds based on realistic potentials is presented. We consider the isospin one-half example system, with Dπ, Dη, DsK¯, D*π, D*η, D*K¯ coupled channels in the JP=1− partial wave, chosen such that various phenomena that come with the opening of an anomalous threshold can be illustrated in a stepwise procedure by a suitable variation of up, down and strange quark masses. We use a set of low-energy constants in the chiral Lagrangian that were adjusted to a large set of lattice QCD results. The six phase shifts and inelasticity parameters are presented for various choices of the pion mass. For a pion mass of 150 MeV there are no anomalous thresholds encountered. The small change from 150 MeV to 145 MeV pion mass causes a dramatic impact of the anomalous threshold on the phase shifts showing that our results are highly relevant for the extrapolation of lattice QCD calculations toward the physical pion mass.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (29)

  1. A. Gasparyan and M. F. M. Lutz, Nucl. Phys. A848, 126 (2010).
  2. A. Gasparyan, M. F. M. Lutz, and B. Pasquini, Nucl. Phys. A866, 79 (2011).
  3. I. Danilkin, A. Gasparyan, and M. F. M. Lutz, Phys. Lett. B 697, 147 (2011).
  4. A. M. Gasparyan, M. F. M. Lutz, and E. Epelbaum, Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 115 (2012).
  5. R. Casalbuoni, A. Deandrea, N. Di Bartolomeo, R. Gatto, F. Feruglio, and G. Nardulli, Phys. Rep. 281, 145 (1997).
  6. E. Kolomeitsev and M. F. M. Lutz, Phys. Lett. B 582, 39 (2004).
  7. J. Hofmann and M. F. M. Lutz, Nucl. Phys. A733, 142 (2004).
  8. M. F. M. Lutz and M. Soyeur, Nucl. Phys. A813, 14 (2008).
  9. F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and U.-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J. A 40, 171 (2009).
  10. M. Albaladejo, P. Fernandez-Soler, F.-K. Guo, and J. Nieves, Phys. Lett. B 767, 465 (2017).
  11. M.-L. Du, M. Albaladejo, P. Fernández-Soler, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, J. Nieves, and D.-L. Yao, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094018 (2018).
  12. X.-Y. Guo, Y. Heo, and M. F. M. Lutz, Phys. Rev. D 98, 014510 (2018).
  13. X.-Y. Guo, Y. Heo, and M. F. M. Lutz, Phys. Lett. B 791, 86 (2019).
  14. M. F. M. Lutz, X.-Y. Guo, Y. Heo, and C. L. Korpa, Phys. Rev. D 106, 114038 (2022).
  15. R. Karplus, C. M. Sommerfield, and E. H. Wichmann, Phys. Rev. 111, 1187 (1958).
  16. S. Mandelstam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 84 (1960).
  17. J. S. Ball, W. R. Frazer, and M. Nauenberg, Phys. Rev. 128, 478 (1962).
  18. J. M. Greben and L. P. Kok, Phys. Rev. C 13, 489 (1976).
  19. M. F. M. Lutz, E. E. Kolomeitsev, and C. L. Korpa, Phys. Rev. D 92, 016003 (2015).
  20. M. F. M. Lutz and C. L. Korpa, Phys. Rev. D 98, 076003 (2018).
  21. Miguel Correia, arXiv:2212.06157.
  22. D. Mohler and R. Woloshyn, Phys. Rev. D 84, 054505 (2011).
  23. L. Liu, K. Orginos, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. D 87, 014508 (2013).
  24. D. Mohler, C. Lang, L. Leskovec, S. Prelovsek, and R. Woloshyn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 222001 (2013).
  25. C. Lang, L. Leskovec, D. Mohler, S. Prelovsek, and R. Woloshyn, Phys. Rev. D 90, 034510 (2014).
  26. G. Moir, M. Peardon, S. M. Ryan, C. E. Thomas, and D. J. Wilson, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2016) 011.
  27. G. K. C. Cheung, C. E. Thomas, D. J. Wilson, G. Moir, M. Peardon, and S. M. Ryan (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 100.
  28. L. Gayer, N. Lang, S. M. Ryan, D. Tims, C. E. Thomas, and D. J. Wilson (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 123.
  29. N. Lang and D. J. Wilson (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 252001 (2022).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation