- Letter
- Open Access
Measurement of the production ratio in collisions at the resonance using decays at Belle
Phys. Rev. D 107, L031102 – Published 22 February, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L031102
Abstract
We measure the ratio of branching fractions for the decays to and using and samples, where stands for ( or ), with of data collected at the resonance with the Belle detector. We find the decay rate ratio of over to be , which is the most precise measurement to date. The first and second uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively, and the third uncertainty is due to the assumption of isospin symmetry in .
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (34)
- J. L. Hewett and J. D. Wells, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5549 (1997).
- M. Beneke, T. Feldmann, and D. Seidel, Nucl. Phys. B612, 25 (2001).
- T. Feldmann and J. Matias, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2003) 074.
- D. Atwood and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1736 (1990).
- R. Kaiser, A. V. Manohar, and T. Mehen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 142001 (2003).
- M. B. Voloshin, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 18, 1783 (2003).
- S. B. Athar et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 66, 052003 (2002).
- N. C. Hastings et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 67, 052004 (2003).
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 141801 (2005).
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 65, 032001 (2002).
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 69, 071101 (2004).
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 042001 (2005).
- S. Choudhury et al. (Belle Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 105.
- S. Kurokawa and E. Kikutani, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 499, 1 (2003); T. Abe et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2013, 03A001 (2013), and following articles up to 03A011.
- R. Fleischer and T. Mannel, Phys. Lett. B 506, 311 (2001): R. Fleischer (private communication).
- A. J. Buras and R. Fleischer, Phys. Lett. B 365, 390 (1996).
- M. Gronau, O. F. Hernández, D. London, and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 52, 6374 (1995).
- L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1945 (1983).
- M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1914 (1999).
- M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, Nucl. Phys. B591, 313 (2000).
- The inclusion of the charge-conjugate decay mode is implied unless otherwise stated.
- P. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
- A. Abashian et al. (Belle Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 479, 117 (2002); also, see the detector section in J. Brodzicka et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2012, 04D001 (2012).
- Z. Natkaniec et al. (Belle SVD2 Group), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 560, 1 (2006).
- D. J. Lange, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 462, 152 (2001).
- E. Barberio and Z. Wąs, Comput. Phys. Commun. 79, 291 (1994); P. Golonka and Z. Wąs, Eur. Phys. J. C 45, 97 (2006); 50, 53 (2007).
- R. Brun et al., CERN Report No. DD/EE/84-1, 1984.
- M. Feindt and U. Kerzel, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 559, 190 (2006).
- N. Dash et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 171801 (2017).
- A. Abashian et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 491, 69 (2002).
- K. Hanagaki, H. Kakuno, H. Ikeda, T. Iijima, and T. Tsukamoto, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 485, 490 (2002).
- T. Skwarnicki, Ph.D. thesis, Institute for Nuclear Physics, Krakow; DESY Internal Report No. DESY F31-86-02, 1986.
- H. Albrecht et al. (ARGUS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 241, 278 (1990).
- Y. Amhis et al. (HFLAV Group Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 226 (2021).