Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Finite S matrix

Holmfridur Hannesdottir* and Matthew D. Schwartz†

  • Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachuetts 02138, USA

  • *holmfridur_hannesdottir@g.harvard.edu
  • †schwartz@g.harvard.edu

Phys. Rev. D 107, L021701 – Published 27 January, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L021701

Abstract

When massless particles are involved, the traditional scattering matrix (S matrix) does not exist: It has no rigorous nonperturbative definition and has infrared divergences in its perturbative expansion. The problem can be traced to the impossibility of isolating single-particle states at asymptotic times. On the other hand, the troublesome nonseparable interactions are often universal: In gauge theories, they factorize so that the asymptotic evolution is independent of the hard scattering. Exploiting this factorization property, we show how a finite “hard” S matrix, SH, can be defined by replacing the free Hamiltonian with a soft-collinear asymptotic Hamiltonian. The elements of SH are gauge invariant and infrared finite and exist even in conformal field theories. One can interpret elements of SH alternatively 1) as elements of the traditional S matrix between dressed states, 2) as Wilson coefficients, or 3) as remainder functions. These multiple interpretations provide different insights into the rich structure of SH.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (44)

  1. R. Haag, Kong. Dan. Vid. Sel. Mat. Fys. Med. 29N12, 1 (1955) [Philos. Mag. Ser. 5 746, 376 (1955)].
  2. R. Haag, Phys. Rev. 112, 669 (1958).
  3. R. Haag, Nuovo Cimento 14, 131 (1959).
  4. D. Ruelle, Helv. Phys. Acta 35, 147 (1962).
  5. H. Lehmann, K. Symanzik, and W. Zimmermann, Nuovo Cimento 1, 205 (1955).
  6. J. Collins, arXiv:1904.10923.
  7. T. Kinoshita, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 3, 650 (1962).
  8. T. D. Lee and M. Nauenberg, Phys. Rev. 133, B1549 (1964).
  9. C. Frye, H. Hannesdottir, N. Paul, M. D. Schwartz, and K. Yan, Phys. Rev. D 99, 056015 (2019).
  10. J. D. Dollard, Rocky Mt. J. Math. 1, 5 (1971).
  11. V. Chung, Phys. Rev. 140, B1110 (1965).
  12. P. A. Dirac, Can. J. Phys. 33, 650 (1955).
  13. P. P. Kulish and L. D. Faddeev, Teor. Mat. Fiz. 4, 153 (1970) [Theor. Math. Phys. 4, 745 (1970)].
  14. T. W. B. Kibble, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 9, 315 (1968).
  15. D. Zwanziger, Phys. Rev. D 7, 1082 (1973).
  16. E. Bagan, M. Lavelle, and D. McMullan, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 282, 471 (2000).
  17. V. Del Duca, L. Magnea, and G. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B324, 391 (1989).
  18. H. F. Contopanagos and M. B. Einhorn, Phys. Rev. D 45, 1291 (1992).
  19. G. Giavarini and G. Marchesini, Nucl. Phys. B296, 546 (1988).
  20. D. A. Forde and A. Signer, Nucl. Phys. B684, 125 (2004).
  21. J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. F. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B308, 833 (1988).
  22. J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. F. Sterman, Adv. Ser. Dir. High Energy Phys. 5, 1 (1988).
  23. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, and M. E. Luke, Phys. Rev. D 63, 014006 (2000).
  24. M. Beneke, A. Chapovsky, M. Diehl, and T. Feldmann, Nucl. Phys. B643, 431 (2002).
  25. M. Beneke and T. Feldmann, Phys. Lett. B 553, 267 (2003).
  26. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, I. Z. Rothstein, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 66, 014017 (2002).
  27. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 63, 114020 (2001).
  28. I. Feige and M. D. Schwartz, Phys. Rev. D 88, 065021 (2013).
  29. I. Feige and M. D. Schwartz, Phys. Rev. D 90, 105020 (2014).
  30. T. Becher, A. Broggio, and A. Ferroglia, Lect. Notes Phys. 896, 1 (2015).
  31. I. W. Stewart, Lectures on the Soft-Collinear Effective Theory, MIT Open Courseware (2013), https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/8-851-effective-field-theory-spring-2013/e42f16669e30d209bfdd377646b745a3_MIT8_851S13_scetnotes.pdf.
  32. I. Z. Rothstein and I. W. Stewart, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 025.
  33. A. V. Manohar, Phys. Rev. D 68, 114019 (2003).
  34. M. Beneke and V. A. Smirnov, Nucl. Phys. B522, 321 (1998).
  35. A. V. Manohar and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074002 (2007).
  36. G. F. Sterman and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1436 (1977).
  37. Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and V. A. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. D 72, 085001 (2005).
  38. C. Anastasiou, Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and D. A. Kosower, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 251602 (2003).
  39. V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, and V. A. Smirnov, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2010) 084.
  40. A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 151605 (2010).
  41. S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, A. McLeod, and M. von Hippel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 241601 (2016).
  42. L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, and J. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2011) 032.
  43. J. Golden, A. J. McLeod, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 195.
  44. H. Hannesdottir and M. D. Schwartz, Phys. Rev. D 101, 105001 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation