Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

U-spin puzzle in B decays

Bhubanjyoti Bhattacharya1,*, Suman Kumbhakar2,†, David London2,‡, and Nicolas Payot2,§

  • 1Department of Natural Sciences, Lawrence Technological University, Southfield, Michigan 48075, USA
  • 2Physique des Particules, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec H2V 0B3, Canada

  • *bbhattach@ltu.edu
  • †suman.kumbhakar@umontreal.ca
  • ‡london@lps.umontreal.ca
  • §nicolas.payot@umontreal.ca

Phys. Rev. D 107, L011505 – Published 27 January, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L011505

Abstract

We impose U-spin symmetry [SU(2)Uspin] on the Hamiltonian for B decays. As expected, we find the equality of amplitudes related by the exchange d↔s. We also find that the amplitudes for the ΔS=0 processes B0→π+π−, Bs0→π+K−, and B0→K+K− form a U-spin triangle relation. The amplitudes for Bs0→K+K−, B0→π−K+, and Bs0→π+π− form a similar ΔS=1 triangle relation. And these two triangles are related to one another by d↔s. We perform fits to the observables for these six decays. If perfect U spin is assumed, then the fit is very poor. If U-spin-breaking contributions are added, then we find many scenarios that can explain the data. However, in all cases, 100% U-spin breaking is required, considerably larger than the naive expectation of ∼20%. This is the U-spin puzzle; it may be strongly hinting at the presence of new physics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (22)

  1. R. Fleischer, New strategies to extract β and γ from Bd→π+π− and Bs→K+K−, Phys. Lett. B 459, 306 (1999).
  2. M. Gronau and D. London, Isospin Analysis of CP Asymmetries in B Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3381 (1990).
  3. M. Gronau, O. F. Hernández, D. London, and J. L. Rosner, Decays of B mesons to two light pseudoscalars, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4529 (1994).
  4. Y. Amhis et al. (HFLAV Collaboration), Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2021, arXiv:2206.07501.
  5. Y. T. Duh et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurements of branching fractions and direct CP asymmetries for B→Kπ, B→ππ and B→KK decays, Phys. Rev. D 87, 031103 (2013).
  6. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of b-hadron branching fractions for two-body decays into charmless charged hadrons, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2012) 037.
  7. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of CP violation in two-body B(s)0-meson decays to charged pions and kaons, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 075.
  8. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of the Annihilation Decay Mode B0→K+K−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 081801 (2017).
  9. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Observation of New Charmless Decays of Bottom Hadrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 031801 (2009).
  10. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Measurements of Direct CP Violating Asymmetries in Charmless Decays of Strange Bottom Mesons and Bottom Baryons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 181802 (2011).
  11. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration, Improved measurements of the branching fractions for B0→π+π− and B0→K+π−, and a search for B0→K+K−, Phys. Rev. D 75, 012008 (2007).
  12. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  13. F. James and M. Roos, minuit: A system for function minimization and analysis of the parameter errors and correlations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 10, 343 (1975).
  14. F. James and M. Winkler, minuit user’s guide.
  15. F. James, minuit function minimization and error analysis: Reference manual version 94.1, Report No. CERN-D-506, CERN-D506.
  16. M. Gronau, U-spin breaking in CP asymmetries in B decays, Phys. Lett. B 727, 136 (2013).
  17. Y. Grossman, Z. Ligeti, and D. J. Robinson, More flavor SU(3) tests for new physics in CP violating B decays, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 066.
  18. S. Schacht, A U-spin anomaly in charm CP violation, arXiv:2207.08539.
  19. R. Bause, H. Gisbert, G. Hiller, T. Höhne, D. F. Litim, and T. Steudtner, Two is better than one: The U-spin-CP anomaly in charm, arXiv:2210.16330.
  20. Y. Nir, I. Savoray, and Y. Viernik, Lessons from the LHCb measurement of CP violation in Bs→K+K−, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 068.
  21. For a review, see D. London and J. Matias, B flavour anomalies: 2021 theoretical status report, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72, 37 (2022).
  22. N. B. Beaudry, A. Datta, D. London, A. Rashed, and J. S. Roux, The B→πK puzzle revisited, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2018) 074.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation