Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

X and Zcs in B+→J/ψϕK+ as s-wave threshold cusps and alternative spin-parity assignments to X(4274) and X(4500)

Xuan Luo1 and Satoshi X. Nakamura2,3,*

  • 1School of Physics and Optoelectronics Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, People’s Republic of China
  • 2University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, People’s Republic of China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics (IHEP-USTC), Hefei 230036, People’s Republic of China

  • *satoshi@ustc.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 107, L011504 – Published 27 January, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L011504

Abstract

Recent LHCb amplitude analysis on B+→J/ψϕK+ suggests the existence of exotic X and Zcs hadrons, based on an assumption that Breit-Wigner resonances describe all the peak structures. However, all the peaks and also dips in the spectra are located at relevant meson-meson thresholds where threshold kinematical cusps might cause such structures. This points to the importance of an independent amplitude analysis with due consideration of the kinematical effects, and this is what we do in this work. Our model fits well J/ψϕ, J/ψK+, and K+ϕ invariant mass distributions simultaneously, demonstrating that all the X, Zcs, and dip structures can be well described with the ordinary s-wave threshold cusps. Spin-parity of the X(4274) and X(4500) structures are respectively 0− and 1− from our model, as opposed to 1+ and 0+ from the LHCb model. With all relevant threshold cusps considered, the number of fitting parameters seems to be significantly reduced. The LHCb data requires Ds(*)D¯* scattering lengths in our model to be consistent with zero, disfavoring Ds(*)D¯* molecule interpretations of Zcs(4000) and Zcs(4220) and, via the SU(3) relation, being consistent with previous lattice QCD results.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (53)

  1. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rep. 639, 1 (2016).
  2. S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, and D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015003 (2018).
  3. N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, The XYZ states: Experimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rep. 873, 1 (2020).
  4. P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), The review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  5. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Evidence for a Narrow Near-Threshold Structure in the J/ψϕ Mass Spectrum in B+→J/ψϕK+ Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 242002 (2009).
  6. J. Brodzicka, Heavy flavour spectroscopy, Conf. Proc. C0908171, 299 (2009).
  7. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Observation of the Y(4140) structure in the J/ψϕ mass spectrum in B±→J/ψϕK± decays, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 32, 1750139 (2017).
  8. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Search for the X(4140) state in B+→J/ψϕK+ decays, Phys. Rev. D 85, 091103(R) (2012).
  9. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of a peaking structure in the J/ψϕ mass spectrum from B±→J/ψϕK± decays, Phys. Lett. B 734, 261 (2014).
  10. V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Search for the X(4140) state in B+→J/ψϕK+ decays with the D0 detector, Phys. Rev. D 89, 012004 (2014).
  11. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration, Study of B±,0→J/ψK+K−K±,0 and search for B0→J/ψϕ at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D 91, 012003 (2015).
  12. V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Inclusive Production of the X(4140) State in pp¯ Collisions at D0, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 232001 (2015).
  13. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of J/ψϕ Structures Consistent with Exotic States from Amplitude Analysis of B+→J/ψϕK+ Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 022003 (2017).
  14. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Amplitude analysis of B+→J/ψϕK+ decays, Phys. Rev. D 95, 012002 (2017).
  15. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of New Resonances Decaying to J/ψK+ and J/ψϕ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 082001 (2021).
  16. F.-K. Guo, X.-H. Liu, and S. Sakai, Threshold cusps and triangle singularities in hadronic reactions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 112, 103757 (2020).
  17. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, Canonical description of the new LHCb resonances, Phys. Rev. D 94, 114018 (2016).
  18. X.-H. Liu, How to understand the underlying structures of X(4140), X(4274), X(4500) and X(4700), Phys. Lett. B 766, 117 (2017).
  19. X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy-antiheavy hadronic molecules, Prog. Phys. 41, 65 (2021).
  20. E. S. Swanson, Cusps and exotic charmonia, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 25, 1642010 (2016).
  21. S. X. Nakamura, X structures in B+→J/ψϕK+ as one-loop and double-triangle threshold cusps, Phys. Lett. B 834, 137486 (2022).
  22. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of a Near-Threshold Structure in the K+ Recoil-Mass Spectra in e+e−→K+(Ds−D*0+Ds*−D0), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 102001 (2021).
  23. P.-P. Shi, F. Huang, and W.-L. Wang, Hidden charm tetraquark states in a diquark model, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094038 (2021).
  24. J. F. Giron, R. F. Lebed, and S. R. Martinez, Spectrum of hidden-charm, open-strange exotics in the dynamical diquark model, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054001 (2021).
  25. Q.-N. Wang, W. Chen, and H.-X. Chen, Exotic D¯s(*)  D(*) molecular states and scq¯c¯ tetraquark states with JP=0+,1+,2+, Chin. Phys. C 45, 093102 (2021).
  26. L. Maiani, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, The new resonances Zcs(3985) and Zcs(4003) (almost) fill two tetraquark nonets of broken SU(3)f, Sci. Bull. 66, 1616 (2021).
  27. J.-B. Wang, G. Li, C.-S. An, C.-R. Deng, and J.-J. Xie, The low-lying hidden- and double-charm tetraquark states in a constituent quark model with instanton-induced interaction, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 721 (2022).
  28. M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Configuration mixing in strange tetraquarks Zcs, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034033 (2021).
  29. S. Han and L.-Y. Xiao, Aspects of Zcs(3985) and Zcs(4000), Phys. Rev. D 105, 054008 (2022).
  30. L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Implications of the Zcs(3985) and Zcs(4000) as two different states, Sci. Bull. 66, 2065 (2021).
  31. Z.-G. Wang, The decay widths of the Zcs(3985/4000) based on rigorous quark-hadron duality, Chin. Phys. C 46, 103106 (2022).
  32. P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, The strange partner of the Zc structures in a coupled-channels model, Phys. Lett. B 818, 136382 (2021).
  33. Z. Yang, X. Cao, F.-K. Guo, J. Nieves, and M. P. Valderrama, Strange molecular partners of the Zc(3900) and Zc(4020), Phys. Rev. D 103, 074029 (2021).
  34. Y.-H. Ge, X.-H. Liu, and H.-W. Ke, Threshold effects as the origin of Zcs(4000), Zcs(4220) and X(4700) observed in B+→J/ψϕK+, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 854 (2021).
  35. M.-L. Du, M. Albaladejo, F.-K. Guo, and J. Nieves, Combined analysis of the Zc(3900) and the Zcs(3985) exotic states, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074018 (2022).
  36. V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, A. A. Filin, C. Hanhart, and A. V. Nefediev, Is Zcs(3982) a molecular partner of Zc(3900) and Zc(4020) states?, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034014 (2022).
  37. S. Prelovsek and L. Leskovec, Search for Zc+(3900) in the 1+− channel on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 727, 172 (2013).
  38. Y. Chen, M. Gong, Y.-H. Lei, N. Li, J. Liang, C. Liu et al., Low-energy scattering of the (DD¯*)± system and the resonance-like structure Zc(3900), Phys. Rev. D 89, 094506 (2014).
  39. S. Prelovsek, C. B. Lang, L. Leskovec, and D. Mohler, Study of the Zc+ channel using lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 91, 014504 (2015).
  40. Y. Ikeda, S. Aoki, T. Doi, S. Gongyo, T. Hatsuda, T. Inoue, T. Iritani, N. Ishii, K. Murano, and K. Sasaki, Fate of the Tetraquark Candidate Zc(3900) from Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 242001 (2016).
  41. G. K. C. Cheung, C. E. Thomas, J. J. Dudek, and R. G. Edwards, Tetraquark operators in lattice QCD and exotic flavour states in the charm sector, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 033.
  42. M. Albaladejo, F.-K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque, and J. Nieves, Zc(3900): What has been really seen?, Phys. Lett. B 755, 337 (2016).
  43. M. Albaladejo, P. Fernandez-Soler, and J. Nieves, Zc(3900): Confronting theory and lattice simulations, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 573 (2016).
  44. Z. Yang, G.-J. Wang, J.-J. Wu, M. Oka, and S.-L. Zhu, Novel Coupled Channel Framework Connecting Quark Model and Lattice QCD: An Investigation on Near-Threshold Ds States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 112001 (2022).
  45. L. Liu, K. Orginos, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and U.-G. Meißner, Interactions of charmed mesons with light pseudoscalar mesons from lattice QCD and implications on the nature of the Ds0*(2317), Phys. Rev. D 87, 014508 (2013).
  46. A. Martínez Torres, E. Oset, S. Prelovsek, and A. Ramos, Reanalysis of lattice QCD spectra leading to the Ds0*(2317) and Ds1*(2460), J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2015) 153.
  47. G. K. C. Cheung, C. E. Thomas, D. J. Wilson, G. Moir, M. Peardon, and S. M. Ryan (Hadron Spectrum Collaboration), DK I=0, DK¯ I=0, 1 scattering and the Ds0*(2317) from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 100.
  48. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L011504 for amplitude formulas, parameter values and fit fractions for the default model, with included Ref. [49].
  49. H. Kamano, S. X. Nakamura, T. S. Lee, and T. Sato, Unitary coupled-channels model for three-mesons decays of heavy mesons, Phys. Rev. D 84, 114019 (2011).
  50. S. X. Nakamura, Triangle singularity appearing as an X(3872)-like peak in B→(J/ψπ+π−)Kπ, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074004 (2020).
  51. X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Explaining the Many Threshold Structures in the Heavy-Quark Hadron Spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 152001 (2021).
  52. F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, Q. Wang, and Q. Zhao, Could the near-threshold XYZ states be simply kinematic effects?, Phys. Rev. D 91, 051504(R) (2015).
  53. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Determination of the Spin and Parity of the Zc(3900), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 072001 (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation